Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:17:39.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Smith (and Jones) Go to Washington: Democracy and Vice-Presidential Selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2012

Joseph Uscinski
Joseph Uscinski
Affiliation:
University of Miami
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The American vice president's most notable constitutional function is that of succession: if the president unexpectedly leaves office, the vice president becomes president. The process of selecting vice-presidential running mates has fallen into fewer hands over time, moving from the electorate, to party bosses and delegates, to a single person: the presidential candidate. The selection process presents challenges for democratic governance: electoral considerations may provide presidential candidates with incentive to choose vice-presidential running mates who differ from themselves politically. In cases of succession, this can lead to undemocratic outcomes and unstable policy.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 58 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Philip. 2005. “Accidental Presidents: Death, Assassination, Resignation, and Democratic Succession.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 35 (4): 627–45.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 2008. “Abolish the Vice-presidency.” Los Angeles Times.Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed, and Amar, Vikram David. 1995. “Is the Presidential Succession Law Constitutional?” Stanford Law Review 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Jody. 2006a. The American Vice-Presidency Reconsidered. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Jody. 2006b. “The Second Best Choice? Vice Presidential Candidate Qualifications in the Traditional and Modern Eras.” White House Studies 6: 179–95.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Jody. 2008a. “Scoundrel of Uber-Lieutenant? The Vice Presidency of Dick Cheney.” American Review of Politics 29: 235–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Jody. 2008b. “The Veepstakes: Forecasting Vice Presidential Selection in 2008.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41 (4): 765–72Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Jody, and Case, Rhonda Evans. 2009. “Constitutional Design of the Executive: Vice Presidencies in Comparative Perspective.” Congress & the Presidency 36: 148–63.Google Scholar
Berger, Raoul. 1973. Impeachment: The Constitutional Problems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard, and Agel, Jerome. 2003. Amending America. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Bresnahan, John. 2008. “Wexler Calls for Cheney's Impeachment.” In Politico. http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0108/wexler_renews_call_for_Cheneys_impeachment.html.Google Scholar
Brox, Brian J., and Cassels, Madison L.. 2009. “The Contemporary Effects of Vice-Presidential Nominees: Sarah Palin and the 2008 Presidential Campaign.” Journal of Political Marketing 8: 349–63.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Elisabeth. 2008. “McCain Asked about Kerry's V.P. Offer.” The New York Times, March 7.Google Scholar
Bush, George W. 2002. “Remarks by the President Upon Departure for Camp David,” ed. The White House.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Steven. 1995. “The Political Question of Presidential Succession.” Stanford Law Review 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter Unabridged Edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, James W. 1982. American Assassins: The Darker Side of Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, James W. 1990. On Being Mad or Merely Angry: John W. Hinckley, Jr., and Other Dangerous People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, James W. 2001. The Lineaments of Wrath: Race, Violent Crime, and American Culture. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Clarke, James W. 2006. Defining Danger: American Assassins and the New Domestic Terrorists. New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey E. 2001. “Popular Views of the Vice President and Vice Presidential Favorability.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 31 (2): 349–57.Google Scholar
Crockett, David A. 2004. “The Contemporary Presidency: Unity in the Executive and the Presidential Succession Act.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 34 (2): 394–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 2002. How Democratic is the American Constitution? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Devine, Christopher J., and Kopko, Kyle C.. 2011. “The Vice Presidential Home State Advantage Reconsidered: Analyzing the Interactive Effect of Home State Population and Political Experience, 1884–2008.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 41 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Dorff, Cassy, and Pedahzur, Ami. 2009. “What Motivates Political Assassins? A New Assessment.” In Midwest Political Science Conference. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Dudley, Robert L., and Rapoport, Ronald B.. 1989. “Vice-Presidential Candidates and the Home State Advantage: Playing Second Banana at Home and on the Road.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (2): 537–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, George C., and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. 2008. “The New Vice Presidency: Institutions and Politics.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 38 (3): 369–73.Google Scholar
Farrar-Myers, Victoria A. 2007. Legacies Rejected and Furthered: The Benefits and Struggles of Inheriting a Presidential Agenda. Paper read at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, at Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Feerick, John D. 1976. The Twenty-Fifth Amendment: Its Complete History and Earliest Applications. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Frankovic, Kathleen A. 1985. “The 1984 Election: The Irrelevance of the Campaign.” PS: Political Science and Politics 18 (1): 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstein, Josh. 2006. “Clinton Eligible, Once Again, To Practice Law.” The Sun, January 17.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joel K. 2008. “The Rising Power of the Modern Vice Presidency.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 38 (3): 374–89.Google Scholar
Halbfinger, David M. 2004. “McCain Is Said to Tell Kerry He Won't Join.” New York Times, June 12.Google Scholar
Hansen, Richard H. 1962. The Year We Had No President. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh, Reuss, Henry F., and Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr. 1988. “Report of the Task Force.” In A Heartbeat Away. New York: Priority Press.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1994. “The Behavioral Consequences of Vice-Presidential Debates: Does the Undercard Have Any Punch?” American Politics Research 22 (4): 469–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, Jay A. 1980. “Vice Presidential Eligibility and Selection Patterns.” Polity 12 (3): 509–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles O. 2008. “Vice Presidents and Other Heirs Apparent: The Historical Experience of Experience.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 38 (3): 422–32.Google Scholar
Kassop, Nancy. 2005. “When Law and Politics Collide: Presidents and the Use of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 35 (1): 147–65.Google Scholar
Kengor, Paul. 1997. “The Foreign Policy Role of Vice President Al Gore.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 27 (1): 14–38.Google Scholar
Kengor, Paul. 2000a. “The Vice President, Secretary of State, and Foreign Policy.” Political Science Quarterly 115 (2): 175–99.Google Scholar
Kengor, Paul. 2000b. Wreath Layer or Policy Player?: The Vice President's Role in Foreign Policy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Kenski, Kate. 2010. “The Palin Effect and Vote Preference in the 2008 Presidential Election.” American Behavioral Scientist 54 (3): 222–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kincade, Vance R. 2000. Heirs Apparent: Solving the Vice Presidential Dillemma. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
King, James D., and Riddlesperger, James W.. 1995. “Unscheduled Presidential Transitions: Lessons from the Truman, Johnson, and Ford Administrations.” Congress & the Presidency 22 (1): 17.Google Scholar
Kiser, George C. 1992. “Presidential Primaries: Stepping Stones to the Vice Presidential Nomination?” Presidential Studies Quarterly 22 (3): 493.Google Scholar
Knuckey, Jonathan. 2011. “The ‘Palin Effect’ in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election.” Political Research Quarterly. http://prq.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/04/08/1065912911401415.abstract.Google Scholar
Kucinich, Dennis J. 2008. “A Resolution.” ed. House of Representatives. http://kucinich.us/impeachment/articles.pdf.Google Scholar
Kuhn, David Paul. 2008. “Opposites Attract: VP Hagel, Lieberman?” CBSNews.com, July 17.Google Scholar
Kyvig, David. 2008. The Age of Impeachment: American Constitutional Culture since 1960. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Langston, Thomas S. 2002. “George Herbert Walker Bush and the Dilemmas of the Successor President.” In American Political Science Association. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Light, Paul. 1984a. “Vice-Presidential Influence under Rockefeller and Mondale.” Political Science Quarterly 98 (4): 617–40.Google Scholar
Light, Paul. 1984b. Vice-Presidential Power: Advice and Influence in the White House. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linder, Douglas O. 2010. The Impeachment Trial of Andrew Johnson. University of Missouri–Kansas City 1999 [cited July 4th 2010]. Available from http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/impeach/impeachmt.htm.Google Scholar
Mattei, Franco, and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 1994. “Presidential Succession Effects in Voting.” British Journal of Political Science 24 (4): 495–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“McGovern's First Crisis: The Eagleton Affair.” 1972. Time Magazine, August 7. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,879139,00.html.Google Scholar
McQueeney, Kevin. 2007. “Incapacitation in the Oval Office: Presidential Disability.” In Midwest Political Science Conference. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Moe, Richard. 2008. “The Making of the Modern Vice Presidency: A Personal Reflection.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 38 (3): 390–400.Google Scholar
Murphy, John M., and Stuckey, Mary E.. 2002. “Never Cared to Say Goodbye: Presidential Legacies and Vice Presidential Campaigns.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 32 (1): 46–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diana, and Dilliplane, Susanna. 2011. “Running to the Right: Effects of Campaign Strategy on Mass Opinion and Behavior.” In Facing the Challenge of Democracy: Explorations in the Analysis of Public Opinion and Political Participation, ed. Sniderman, P. M. and Highton, B.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Michael. 1988a. “Background Paper.” A Heartbeat Away 21–101.Google Scholar
Nelson, Michael. 1988b. “Choosing the Vice President.” PS: Political Science and Politics 21 (4): 858–68.Google Scholar
Norrander, Barbara. 1986. “Correlates of Vote Choice in the 1980 Presidential Primaries.” Journal of Politics 48 (1): 156–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pika, Joseph A. 2010. “The Vice Presidency: Dick Cheney, Joe Biden, and the New Vice Presidency.” In The Presidency and the Political System, ed. Nelson, M.. Washington DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson, and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1971. Presidential Elections: Strategies of American Electoral Politics. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Quaid, Libby. 2008. “McCain Discounts Ticket-balancing.” Yahoo.com.Google Scholar
Quinn, Sally. 2010. “Hillary Clinton Should be Obama's Vice President.” The Washington Post, June 18.Google Scholar
Rauchway, Eric. 2004. Murdering McKinley: The Making of Theodore Roosevelt's America. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Relyea, Harold C. 2010. “The Executive Office of the Vice President: Constitutional and Legal Considerations.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 40 (2): 327–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, David W. 2001. “Requiem for a Lightwieght: Vice Presidential Candidate Evaluations and the Presidential Vote.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 31 (3): 454–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossitier, Clinton. 1948. “The Reform of the Vice-Presidency.” Political Science Quarterly 63 (3): 383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur M. 1974. “On the Presidential Succession.” Political Science Quarterly 89 (3): 475–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Dhavan, Watts, Mark, Domke, David, and Fan, David. 2002. “News Framing and Cueing of Issue Regimes: Explaining Clinton's Public Approval in Spite of Scandal.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 66 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 1997. “The ‘Veepstakes’: Strategic Choice in Presidential Running Mate Selection.” The American Political Science Review 91 (4): 855–64.Google Scholar
Silva, Ruth C. 1968. Presidential Succession. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Simonton, Dean Keith. 1981. “Presidential Greatness and Performance: Can We Predict Leadership in the White House?” Journal of Personality 49: 306–23.Google Scholar
Simonton, Dean Keith. 1985. “The Vice-Presidential Succession Effect: Individual or Situational Basis?” Political Behavior 7 (1): 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sindler, Allan P. 1976. Unchosen Presidents: The Vice-President and Other Frustrations of Presidential Succession. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sirgiovanni, George S. 1994. “Dumping the Vice President: An Historical Overview and Analysis.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 24 (4): 765–78.Google Scholar
Stevens, Donald G. 1996. “Organizing for Exonomic Defense: Hanry Wallace and the Board of Economic Warfare's Foreign Policy Initiatives, 1942.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 26 (4): 1126–39.Google Scholar
Tassel, Emily Field Van, and Finkelman, Paul. 1999. Impeachable Offenses: A Documentary History from 1787 to the Present. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Tilove, Jonathan. 2008. “Obama's Appalachian Problem.” The Seattle Times, May 15.Google Scholar
Tubbesing, Carl D. 1973. “Vice Presidential Candidates and the Home State Advantage: Or, ‘Tom Who?’ Was Tom Eagleton in Missouri.” The Western Political Quarterly 26 (4): 702–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulbig, Stacy G. 2010. “The Appeal of Second Bananas: The Impact of Vice Presidential Candidates on Presidential Vote Choice, Yesterday and Today.” American Politics Research 38 (2): 330–55.Google Scholar
Walch, Timothy, ed. 1995. At the President's Side: The Vice Presidency in the Twentieth Century. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Warshaw, Shirley Anne. 2009. The Co-Presidency of Bush and Cheney. Stanford, CA: Stanford Politics and Policy.Google Scholar
Watson, Robert P., and Yon, Richard M.. 2006. “Vice Presidential Selection in the Modern Era: A Model.” White House Studies 6 (2): 163–78.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1995. “The Role of the Vice Presidential Candidate Ratings in Presidential Voting Research.” American Politics Research 23 (4): 504–14.Google Scholar
Waugh, Edgar Wiggins. 1956. Second Consul: The Vice-Presidency: Our Greatest Political Problem. New York: Bobbs-MerrillGoogle Scholar
Wilmerding, Lucius. 1953. “The Vice Presidency.” Political Science Quarterly 68 (1): 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witcover, Jules. 1992. Crapshoot: Rolling the Dice on the Vice-Presidency. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Wright, Benjamin F., ed. 1996. The Federalist: The Famous Papers on the Principles of American Government. New York: Barnes and Noble Books.Google Scholar