Skip to main content Accessibility help

Response to “American Democracy in an Age of Inequality”

  • Frances Fox Piven (a1)


The APSA Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy's Report (2004), American Democracy in an Age of Inequality, concludes that progress toward realizing our ideals of democracy “may have stalled, and in some arenas reversed” as a result of growing inequality. Political participation, whether through voting, or campaign contributions, or organizational activities, reflects the distribution of economic resources, and as resources come to be more unequal, so is participation increasingly skewed toward the better-off. As a result, the Report goes on to argue, the issues and positions of the affluent are heard by politicians, and louder voices give the affluent greater influence. I agree with this conclusion, so far as it goes. Disparities in voting, money, and organization matter in the political process, and economic inequalities inevitably affect these disparities. None of this is new, of course. While inequalities have increased during the past three decades, they have increased during earlier periods in American history. This is normal politics in the United States, sometimes worse, sometimes better.



Hide All


APSA Task Force on Inequality, and American Democracy. 2004. “American Democracy in an Age of Rising Inequality: Report of the American Political Science Association Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy.Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association. Available at
Confessore, Nicholas. 2003. “Welcome to the Machine: How the GOP Disciplined K Street and Made Bush Supreme.” Washington Monthly Online, July/August.
Don't Follow the Money.” 2005. New York Times, June 12.
Drew, Elizabeth. 2005. “Selling Washington.” New York Review, June 23, 2427.
Engelhart, Tom. 2005. “Tomgram: Mark Danner on Smoking Signposts to Nowhere.” June 14.
Estey, Ken. 2005. “Review of Labor's Time: Shorter Hours, the UAW, and the Struggle for American Unionism by Jonathan Cutler.” WorkingUSA: The Journal of Labor and Society 8(March): 370374.
Gitlin, Todd. 2005. “MIA: News of Prison Toll.” The Nation, July 4.
Green, Mark. 1986. “Stamping Out Corruption.” New York Times, October 28: A35.
Greenberg, Stanley B. 2005. “How We Found—and Lost—a Majority.” American Prospect, June.
Greenberg, Stanley B. 1991. “From Crisis to Working Majority.”
Hacker, Jacob S., and Paul Pierson. 2005. “Abandoning the Middle: The Bush Tax Cuts and the Limits of Democratic Control.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (March): 3353.
Hicks, Alex. 2003. “Back to the Future? A Review Essay on Income Concentration and Conservatism.” Socio-Economic Review 1: 271288.
Johnston, David Cay. 2005. “Tax Laws Help to Widen Gap at Very Top.” New York Times, June 5: 1.
Laphan, Lewis. 2004. “Tentacles of Rage: The Republican Propaganda Mill.” Harpers, September.
Ollman, Bertell, and Jonathan Birnbaum, eds. 1990. The United States Constitution. New York: New York University Press.
Phillips, Kevin. 2002. Wealth and Democracy: A Political History of the American Rich. New York: Broadway Books.
Rosenbaum, David E. 2003. “Bush May Have Exaggerated, but Did He Lie?New York Times, Week in Review Section, June 22: 1.
Schell, Jonathan. 1999. “Master of All He Surveys.” The Nation, June 21.
Schurin, Ronald. 1996. “A Party Form of Government.” Ph.D. diss., Graduate School of the City University of New York.
Singer, Aaron. 1976. Campaign Speeches of American Presidential Candidates. New York: Unger.
“Squelching Public Broadcasting.” 2005. Editorial, New York Times, June 15.
State of Working America 2002/2003: 16.
Toner, Robin, and Marjorie Connelly. 2005. “Bush's Support on Major Issues Tumbles in Poll.” New York Times, June 17.
Zinn, Howard, and Anthony Arnove. 2004. Voices of a People's History of the United States. New York: Seven Story Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Response to “American Democracy in an Age of Inequality”

  • Frances Fox Piven (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.