Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Presidential Primary Turnout 1972–2016

  • Lonna Rae Atkeson (a1) and Cherie D. Maestas (a2)

Abstract

We explore the implications of sequential presidential primary elections for turnout in selecting the presidential party nominees. Drawing from a micro-level theory of participation in sequential elections, we develop a set of aggregate-level hypotheses that tease out different ways that candidate mobilization efforts as well as the legal and institutional structures within a sequential contest influence turnout in presidential nomination contests. Using data from all state primary elections from 1972–2016, we find that electorates facing winnowed candidate pools, and those with contests after the effective endings to presidential contests have substantially reduced turnout that effectively disenfranchises voters in many states. Sequenced primary elections lead to lower overall turnout and less meaningful participation for many voters during presidential nominations contests.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Presidential Primary Turnout 1972–2016
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Presidential Primary Turnout 1972–2016
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Presidential Primary Turnout 1972–2016
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Aldrich, John H. 1980. Before the Convention: Strategies and Choices in Presidential Nomination Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 1993. “Moving Toward Unity: Attitudes in the Nomination and General Election Stages of the Presidential Campaign.” American Politics Quarterly 21 (3): 272–89.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae and Maestas, Cherie D.. 2009. “Meaningful Participation and the Evolution of the Reformed Presidential Nominating System.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (1): 5964.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 1998. “Divisive Primaries and General Election Outcomes: Another Look at Presidential Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 256–71.
Battaglini, Marco. 2005. “Sequential Voting with Abstention.” Games and Economic Behavior 51 (2): 445–63.
Bartels, Larry M. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bump, Philip. 2016. “Why the Associated Press Called the Race for Hillary Clinton when Nobody was Looking,” Washington Post June 7, available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/06/07/why-the-associated-press-called-the-race-for-hillary-clinton-when-nobody-was-looking/, accessed June 29, 2016.
Geer, John. 1989. Nominating Presidents. New York: Greenwood.
Gurian, Paul-Henri. 1990. “The Influence of Nomination Rules on the Financial Allocations of Presidential Candidates.” Western Political Quarterly 43 (3): 661–91.
Holbrook, Thomas M. and La Raja, Raymond J.. 2008. “Parties and Elections.” In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, 9th edition, ed., Gray, Virginia and Hanson, Russell L.. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 6197.
Jackson, John S. and Crotty, William. 1996. The Politics of Presidential Selection. New York: Harper Collins.
Kenney, Patrick J. and Rice, Tom W.. 1985. “Voter Turnout in Presidential Primaries: A Cross-Sectional Examination.” Political Behavior 7 (1): 101–12.
Kenney, Patrick J. and Rice, Tom W.. 1994. “The Psychology of Political Momentum.” Political Research Quarterly 47 (4): 923–38.
Lucey, Catherine and Swanson, Emily. 2016. “AP-NORC poll: Americans want nomination system changed,” available at: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/f5821f2774c14c39ad00c1777f9ec6ea/ap-norc-poll-americans-support-changing-primary-process.
Commission on Party Structure and Delegate Selection. George S. McGovern, Chair. Mandate for Reform. Washington D.C.: Democratic National Committee, 1970.
Moran, Jack and Fenster, Mark. 1982. “Voter Turnout in Presidential Primaries: A Diachronic Analysis.” American Politics Quarterly 10 (4): 453–76.
Mutz, Diana C. 1995. “Effects of Horse-Race Coverage on Campaign Coffers: Strategic Contributing in Presidential Primaries.” Journal of Politics 57 (4): 1015–42.
Mutz, Diana C. 1997. “Mechanisms of Momentum: Does Thinking Make It So?” Journal of Politics 59 (1): 104–25.
Norrander, Barbara and Smith, Gregg W.. 1985. “Type of Contest, Candidate Strategy and Turnout in Presidential Primaries.” American Politics Quarterly 13 (1): 2850.
Norrander, Barbara. 2000. “The End Game in Post-Reform Presidential Nominations.” Journal of Politics 62 (4): 9991013
Norrander, Barbara. 1986a. “Correlates of Vote Choice in the 1980 Presidential Primaries.” Journal of Politics 48 (1): 156–67.
Norrander, Barbara. 1986b. “Measuring Primary Turnout in Aggregate Analysis.” Political Behavior 8 (4): 356–73.
Norrander, Barbara 1986c. “Selective Participation: Presidential Primary Voters as a subset of General Election Voters.” American Politics Quarterly 14 (1–2): 3553.
Norrander, Barbara. 1992. Super Tuesday: Regional Politics and Presidential Priamries. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ranney, Austin. 1977. Participation in American Presidential Nominations, 1976. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
Steger, Wayne P., Hickman, John, and Yohn, Ken. 2002. “Candidate Competition and Attrition in Presidential Primaries, 1912-2000.” American Politics Research 30 (5):528–54.
Stone, Walter J., Atkeson, Lonna Rae and Rapoport, Ronald. 1992. “Turning On or Turning Off: Mobilization and Demobilization Effects of Participation in Presidential Nomination Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 665–91.
Wolfinger, R and Rosenstone, Steven. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Presidential Primary Turnout 1972–2016

  • Lonna Rae Atkeson (a1) and Cherie D. Maestas (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.