Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:24:50.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Media Coverage of the Congressional Underdog

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2022

John Orman*
Affiliation:
Fairfield University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clarke, P., and Evans, S. 1983. Covering Campaigns: Journalism in Congressional Elections. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cover, A. 1977. One Good Term Deserves Another: The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections. American Journal of Political Science, 21: 523541.10.2307/2110580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, R. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Jacobson, G. 1978. The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections. American Political Science Review, 72: 469491.10.2307/1954105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, G. 1980. Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, G. 1983. The Politics of Congressional Elections. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Jones, C. 1982. The United States Congress. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Keefe, W., and Ogul, M. 1981. The American Legislative Process, 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Pierce, J., Beatty, K., and Hagner, P. 1982. The Dynamics of American Public Opinion. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar