Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:11:11.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In the Supreme Court Justices' Shoes: Critical Thinking Through the Use of Hypothetical Case Law Analyses and Interactive Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2005

Richard J. (Rick) Hardy ,
Chapman Rackaway  and
Laurie E. Sonnier
Richard J. (Rick) Hardy
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Columbia
Chapman Rackaway
Affiliation:
Fort Hays State University
Laurie E. Sonnier
Affiliation:
St. Martin High School—Jackson County (MS) Schools
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Judicial decisions are an integral part of American politics and, despite the presence of written and explicated opinions of federal judges, the internal deliberations and decision making processes of judges themselves remains a mystery to many. A burgeoning body of literature focuses on the use of simulations to engage students and bridge theory to practical application. Few simulations target the judicial component of politics, despite its natural disposition for group participation in a simulation project.Richard J. (Rick) Hardy is the director of the Institute for Leadership in Civic Education, director of the National Institute for Advanced Civic Studies (sponsored by the Center for Civic Education), and assistant director of the Honors College at the University of Missouri-Columbia. He regularly teaches courses in American politics, constitutional law, and the Supreme Court. His publications include: Government in America (Houghton Mifflin), Missouri Government and Politics (Missouri Press), Civic Education (Pearson), and Politics: The Art of Drawing Dividing Lines (Thomson). Hardy also serves as a political commentator for numerous national outlets and is a presidential elector in the Electoral College. Chapman Rackaway teaches courses in American government, political campaign management, political parties, and voting behavior at Fort Hays State University. He is the director and advisor for the Political Campaigns and Management tract at FHSU. He has published in the Journal of Politics and has consulted on numerous state and national political races. Laurie E. Sonnier currently teaches social studies courses at St. Martin high school in Ocean Springs, Mississippi. She earned her B.A. in political science at the University of Southern Mississippi and her M.Ed. in Education from Bowie State University. Laurie has won numerous teaching awards and has been actively involved with the National Council for the Social Studies and the Center for Civic Education. She is the co-editor of Voices of Advocacy in American Democracy (Pearson).

Type
THE TEACHER
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , July 2005 , pp. 411 - 414
Copyright
© 2005 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, Nancy V. 1994. “Oyez, Oyez, Oyez: The Trials of Teaching the Supreme Court.” PS: Political Science and Politics 27 (June): 253–255.Google Scholar
Berger, Raoul. 1997. Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Second Edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Endersby, James W., and David J. Webber. 1995. “Iron Triangle Simulation: A Role-Playing Game for Undergraduates in Congress, Interest Groups, and Public Policy Classes.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28 (September): 520–523.Google Scholar
Hall, Kermit et al., eds. 1999a. American Legal History: Cases and Materials. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hall, Kermit. 1999b. The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hardy, Richard J., James D. King, and James W. Riddlesperger Jr. 1982. “The Presidential Selection Process: Role Playing in a Large American Government Class.” Simulation and Games 13 (December): 451–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensley, Thomas R. 1993. “Come to the Edge: Role Playing Activities in a Constitutional Law Class.” PS: Political Science and Politics 26 (March): 64–68.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Kurt W. 1999. “The Bosnian War Crimes Trial Simulation: Teaching Students about the Fuzziness of World Politics and International Law.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32(September): 589–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Ken. 1980. Simulations: A Handbook for Teachers. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Lyn, Kathlene, and Judd Choate. 1999. “Running for Elected Office: A Ten-Week Political Campaign Simulation for Upper-Division Courses.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32 (March): 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacelle, Richard L. 1989. “Simulating Supreme Court Decision Making.” Political Science Teacher 2: 9–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Elizabeth T., and Mark A. Boyer. 1996. “Designing In-Class Simulations.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29 (December): 690–694.Google Scholar
Twelker, Paul. 1973. “A Basic Reference Shelf on Simulation and Gaming.” In The Guide to Simulations/Games for Education and Training, eds. David Zuckerman and Robert Horn. Lexington, MA: Information Services.Google Scholar
Vile, John R., and Thomas R. Van Dervort. 1994. “Revitalizing Undergraduate Programs through Intercollegiate Mock Trial Competition.” PS: Political Science and Politics 27 (December): 711–717.Google Scholar
Whitaker, Steve. 1973. “A Role-Playing Simulation of the United States Supreme Court.” Teaching Political Science 1: 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodworth, James R., and W. Robert Gump. 1994. Camelot: A Role Playing Simulation for Political Decision Making. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar