Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting

  • Sara Wallace Goodman (a1) and Thomas B. Pepinsky (a2)

Abstract

Gender representation is a pervasive problem in political science. We draw on evidence from the 2017 and 2018 American Political Science Association (APSA) Annual Meeting programs to discuss diversity and representation in large political science disciplinary conferences. APSA program divisions differ substantially in their gender representation: although some are representative of their organized-section membership, others are not, and some sections are particularly likely to feature “manels.” We present representation data by organized section, with discussions of what representation looks like and identifying different types of representation goals. We conclude by offering guidelines for increasing gender representation, for both future submitters and program chairs.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Atchison, Amy L. 2018. “Towards the Good Profession: Improving the Status of Women in Political Science.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 1 (1–2): 279–98.
Beaulieu, Emily, Boydstun, Amber E., Brown, Nadia E., Dionne, Kim Yi, Gillespie, Andra, Klar, Samara, Krupnikov, Yanna, Michelson, Melissa R., Searles, Kathleen, and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2017. “Women Also Know Stuff: Meta-Level Mentoring to Battle Gender Bias in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (3): 779–83.
Breuning, Marijke. 2007. “Women’s Participation in Annual Meetings: Comparative Perspective from ISA.” PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (2): 353–56.
Breuning, Marijke, and Lu, Kelan. 2010. “Participation by Women in ISA Annual Meetings, 2005–2009.” International Studies Perspectives 11 (3): 242–54.
Colgan, Jeff D. 2016. “Where Is International Relations Going? Evidence from Graduate Training.” International Studies Quarterly 60 (3): 486–98.
Dion, Michelle L., Lawrence Sumner, Jane, and Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin. 2018. “Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields.” Political Analysis 26 (3): 312–27.
Gersick, Connie J. G., Dutton, Jane E., and Bartunek, Jean M.. 2000. “Learning from Academia: The Importance of Relationships in Professional Life.” Academy of Management Journal 43 (6): 1026–44.
Gruberg, Marytin. 1993. “Participation by Women in the 1992 APSA Annual Meeeting.” PS: Political Science & Politics 26 (1): 107–107.
Gruberg, Marytin. 2006. “Participation by Women in the 2005 APSA Annual Meeting.” PS: Political Science & Politics 39 (1): 111–12.
Gruberg, Marytin. 2009. “Participation by Women in the 2008 APSA Annual Meeting.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (1): 173–74.
Jensenius, Francesca R., Htun, Mala, Samuels, David J., Singer, David A., Lawrence, Adria, and Chwe, Michael. 2018. “The Benefits and Pitfalls of Google Scholar.”PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (4): 15.
Lake, David A. 2016. “White Man’s IR: An Intellectual Confession.” Perspectives on Politics 14 (4): 1112–22.
Maliniak, Daniel, Powers, Ryan, and Walter, Barbara F.. 2013. “The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations.” International Organization 67 (4): 889922.
Mitchell, Kristina M. W., and Martin, Jonathan. 2018. “Gender Bias in Student Evaluations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 15.
Monroe, Kristen, Ozyurt, Saba, Wrigley, Ted, and Alexander, Amy. 2008. “Gender Equality in Academia: Bad News from the Trenches, and Some Possible Solutions.” Perspectives on Politics 6 (2): 215–33.
Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation, Vol. 75. Oakland: University of California Press.
Teele, Dawn Langan, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2017. “Gender in the Journals: Publication Patterns in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (2): 433–47.
Tolley, Erin. 2017. “Into the Mainstream or Still at the Margins? 50 Years of Gender Research in the Canadian Political Science Association.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique 50 (1): 143–61.
Wängnerud, Lena. 2009. “Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 5169.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed