Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T06:38:38.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Drivers Wanted: Motor Voter and the Election of 1996

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Stephen Knack*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland

Extract

The cartoon below, which I first saw printed on the cover of PS in March 1994, has unfortunately proved prophetic. Voter turnout has steadily declined from its 1960 peak of 63%, and the presidential election of 1996 was the first in the lifetime of most Americans in which a minority of the voting-age population cast ballots. Turnout dropped in every state between 1992 and 1996.

That only 49% of eligible voters went to the polls in 1996 was especially disappointing for advocates of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA). The most dramatic liberalization of voter registration procedures in American history coincided with not only the lowest level of turnout since 1924, but with the largest single four-year decline since 1920. The theory that registration barriers are the chief cause of the gap between turnout rates of the U.S. and other developed democracies suffered a devastating blow, as turnout in North Dakota—where voters aren't even required to register—was a mere 56% of the voting-age population in 1996.

Moreover, the turnout decline was heavily concentrated among “electorally disadvantaged” groups, particularly the young and residentially mobile, the very groups that reform activists expected would be the primary beneficiaries of easier registration. In fact, registration of licensed drivers—the key “motor voter” provision of NVRA—was originally conceived in 1975 by Michigan's then-secretary of state, Richard Austin, as a means of facilitating registration for the young and recent movers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Valuable comments were provided by Michael Martinez, Jan Leighley, and other participants at the 1998 APSA meetings. Jim White provided assistance with Current Population Survey data. Jo-Anne Chasnow of Human SERVE was a key source of information on pre-NVRA motor voter implementation in the states. Any remaining errors are the sole responsibility of the author.

References

Casper, Lynne, and Bass, Loretta. 1998. Voting and Registration in the Election of November 1996. Current Population Reports, P20–504. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
Federal Election Commission. 1997. “The Impact of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 on the Administration of Federal Elections.” Washington, DC: Federal Election Commission.Google Scholar
Fenster, Mark J. 1994. “The Impact of Allowing Day of Registration Voting on Turnout in U.S. Elections from 1960 to 1992.” American Politics Quarterly 22(January): 7487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groarke, Margaret. 1997. “An Early Assessment of the National Voter Registration Act.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Human SERVE. 1996. “The Impact of the National Voter Registration Act, January 1995-June 1996: The First Eighteen Months.” New York: Human SERVE.Google Scholar
Knack, Stephen. 1995. “Does Motor Voter Work? Evidence from State Level Data.” Journal of Politics 57(August): 796811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen., and White, James. 1998. “Did States' Motor Voter Programs Help the Democrats?American Politics Quarterly 26(July): 344–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhine, Staci L. 1995. “Registration Reform and Turnout Change in the American States.” American Politics Quarterly 23(October): 409–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voter News Service. 1997. Voter News Service General Election Exit Polls, 1996 [computer file]. ICPSR version. New York, NY: Voter News Service [producer]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].Google Scholar
White, Hal. 1980. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48(May): 817–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar