Skip to main content Accessibility help

Campaigning Online: Web Display Ads in the 2012 Presidential Campaign

  • Andrew O. Ballard (a1), D. Sunshine Hillygus (a2) and Tobias Konitzer (a3)


Although much of what we know about political advertising comes from the study of television advertising alone, online advertising is an increasingly prominent part of political campaigning. Research on other online political communication—especially candidate websites, blogs, and social media—tends to conclude that these communications are aimed primarily at turning existing supporters into campaign donors, activists, and volunteers. Is a similar communication strategy found in online display ads—those ads placed adjacent to website content? In one of the first systematic analyses of the nature, content, and targets of online display advertising, we examined 840 unique online display ads from the 2012 presidential campaign. We show that the policy content, ad location, and interactive elements of the ads varied based on the audience, with persuasive appeals aimed at undecided or persuadable voters and engagement appeals aimed at existing supporters. Comparing ad content across candidates also found that each side focused on those issues for which the candidate had a strategic advantage. As a consequence, and in contrast to the conclusions of previous research that examines television advertising, we found minimal issue engagement in online advertising.



Hide All
Barnard, Lisa and Kreiss, Daniel. 2013. “A Research Agenda for Online Advertising: Surveying Campaign Practices, 2000–2012.” International Journal of Communication 7 (21): 2046–66.
Baum, Matthew A. 2013. “Presidential Communication Strategies in the Age of Three Medias.” In IPolitics: Citizens, Elections, and Governing in the New Media Era, ed. Fox, R. L. and Ramos, J. M., 183205. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bimber, Bruce and Davis, Richard. 2003. Campaigning Online: The Internet in US Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cogburn, Derrick L. and Espinoza-Vasquez, Fatima K.. 2011. “From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation.” Journal of Political Marketing 10 (1): 189213.
Druckman, James N., Lynn Hennessy, Cari, Kifer, Martin J. and Parkin, Michael. 2010. “Issue Engagement on Congressional Candidate Websites.” Social Science Computer Review 28 (1): 323.
Foot, Kirsten A. and Schneider, Steven M.. 2006. Web Campaigning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fowler, Erika F. and Ridout, Travis N.. 2013. “Negative, Angry, and Ubiquitous: Political Advertising in 2012.” The Forum 10 (2): 5161.
Gentzkow, Matthew and Shapiro, Jesse M.. 2011. “Ideological Segregation Online and Offline.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (4): 1799–839.
Gibson, Rachel K., Margolis, Michael, Resnick, David and Ward, Stephen J.. 2003. “Election Campaigning on the WWW in the USA and UK: A Comparative Analysis.” Party Politics 9 (1): 4775.
Gulati, Girish J. and Williams, Christine B.. 2009. “Closing Gaps, Moving Hurdles: Candidate Web Site Communication in the 2006 Campaigns for Congress.” In Politicking Online: The Transformation of Election Campaign Communications, ed. Panagopoulos, Costas. 4876. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Herrnson, Paul S., Kai Stokes-Brown, Atiya and Hindman, Matthew. 2007. “Campaign Politics and the Digital Divide: Constituency Characteristics, Strategic Considerations, and Candidate Internet Use in State Legislative Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (1): 3142.
Hillygus, D. Sunshine and Shields, Todd G.. 2008. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Political Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kaplan, Noah, Park, David K. and Ridout, Travis N.. 2006. “Dialogue in American Political Campaigns?” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 724–36.
Kaye, Kate. 2010. “The State of Online Political Advertising.” New Haven, CT: Yale Law School. Working Paper.
Kaye, Kate. 2012. “Digital Ad Spend Gap Widens Between Obama and Romney.” ClickZ. Available at
Lafrance, Adrienne. 2015. “How Many Web Sites Are There?” The Atlantic. Available at
Petrocik, John R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–50.
Petrocik, John R., Benoit, William L. and Hansen, Glenn J.. 2003. “Issue Ownership and Presidential Campaigning, 1952–2000.” Political Science Quarterly 118 (4): 599626.
Pew Research Center. 2012. “GOP Holds Early Turnout Edge, But Little Enthusiasm for Romney.” People-Press. Available at
Sides, John. 2006. “Origins of Campaign Agendas.” British Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 407–36.
Sides, John and Vavreck, Lynn. 2013. The Gamble: Choice and Chance in the 2012 Presidential Election. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sigelman, Lee and Buell, Emmett H.. 2004. “Avoidance or Engagement? Issue Convergence in US Presidential Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 650–61.
Simon, Adam F. 2002. The Winning Message: Candidate Behavior, Campaign Discourse, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spiliotes, Constantine J. and Vavreck, Lynn. 2002. “Campaign Advertising: Partisan Convergence or Divergence?” Journal of Politics 64 (1): 249–61.
Stampler, Laura. 2012. “Obama Spent More on Online Ads Than It Cost to Build the Lincoln Memorial.” Business Insider. Available at
Williams, Andrew Paul and Trammell, Kaye D.. 2005. “Candidate Campaign E-Mail Messages in the Presidential Election 2004.” American Behavioral Scientist 49 (4): 560–74.
Williams, Andrew Paul, Trammell, Kaye D., Postelnicu, Monica, Landreville, Kristen D. and Martin, Justin D.. 2005. “Blogging and Hyperlinking: Use of the Web to Enhance Viability During the 2004 US Campaign.” Journalism Studies 6 (2): 177–86.
Xenos, Michael A. and Foot, Kirsten A.. 2005. “Politics as Usual, or Politics Unusual? Position Taking and Dialogue on Campaign Websites in the 2002 US Elections.” Journal of Communication 55 (1): 169–85.
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Ballard supplementary material

 Word (25 KB)
25 KB

Campaigning Online: Web Display Ads in the 2012 Presidential Campaign

  • Andrew O. Ballard (a1), D. Sunshine Hillygus (a2) and Tobias Konitzer (a3)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed