Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Accuracy of Combined Forecasts for the 2012 Presidential Election: The PollyVote

  • Andreas Graefe (a1), J. Scott Armstrong (a2), Randall J. Jones (a3) and Alfred G. Cuzán (a4)

Abstract

We review the performance of the PollyVote, which combined forecasts from polls, prediction markets, experts’ judgment, political economy models, and index models to predict the two-party popular vote in the 2012 US presidential election. Throughout the election year the PollyVote provided highly accurate forecasts, outperforming each of its component methods, as well as the forecasts from FiveThirtyEight.com. Gains in accuracy were particularly large early in the campaign, when uncertainty about the election outcome is typically high. The results confirm prior research showing that combining is one of the most effective approaches to generating accurate forecasts.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Armstrong, J. Scott. 2001. “Combining Forecasts.” In Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners, ed. Armstrong, J. Scott. 417–39. New York: Springer.
Armstrong, J. Scott, and Graefe, Andreas. 2011. “Predicting Elections from Biographical Information about Candidates: A Test of the Index Method.” Journal of Business Research 64(7): 699706.
Campbell, James E. 2012. “Forecasting the 2012 American National Elections.” PS: Political Science and Politics 45(4): 610–74.
Erikson, Robert S., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2012. “Markets vs. Polls as Election Predictors: An Historical Assessment.” Electoral Studies 31(3): 532–39.
Graefe, Andreas. 2013a. “Replication Data for: Accuracy of Combined Forecasts for the 2012 Presidential Election: The PollyVote,” Harvard Dataverse Network, http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/POLLYVOTE2012.
Graefe, Andreas. 2013b. “Issue and Leader Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections.” Electoral Studies 32(4): 644–57.
Graefe, Andreas, and Armstrong, J. Scott. 2012. “Predicting Elections from the Most Important Issue: A Test of the Take-the-Best Heuristic.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 25(1): 4148.
Graefe, Andreas, and Armstrong, J. Scott. 2013. “Forecasting Elections from Voters’ Perceptions of Candidates’ Ability to Handle Issues.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 26(3): 295303.
Graefe, Andreas, Armstrong, J. Scott, Jones, Randall J. Jr., and Cuzán, Alfred G.. 2014. “Combining Forecasts: An Application to Elections.” International Journal of Forecasting 30(1): 4354.
Jones, Randall J. Jr. 2002. Who Will Be in the White House? Predicting Presidential Elections. New York: Longman.
Jones, Randall J. Jr. 2008. “The State of Presidential Election Forecasting: The 2004 Experience.” International Journal of Forecasting 24(2): 310–21.
Kernell, Samuel. 2000. “Life before Polls: Ohio Politicians Predict the 1828 Presidential Vote.” PS: Political Science & Politics 33(3): 569–74.
Montgomery, Jacob M., Hollenbach, Florian M., and Ward, Michael D.. 2012. “Improving Predictions Using Ensemble Bayesian Model Averaging.” Political Analysis 20(3): 271–91.

Accuracy of Combined Forecasts for the 2012 Presidential Election: The PollyVote

  • Andreas Graefe (a1), J. Scott Armstrong (a2), Randall J. Jones (a3) and Alfred G. Cuzán (a4)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed