Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-sbc4w Total loading time: 0.577 Render date: 2021-02-26T08:07:17.561Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Congressional Election Forecasting: Structure-X Models for 2014

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Michael S. Lewis-Beck
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Charles Tien
Affiliation:
Hunter College & The Graduate Center, CUNY

Abstract

Image of the first page of this article
Type
Symposium: The 2014 Midterm Election Forecasts
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Abramowitz, Alan. 2010. “How Large a Wave? Using the Generic Ballot to Forecast the 2010 Midterm Elections.” PS: Political Science and Politics 43 (4): 631–32.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan. 2014. “Long-Term Trends and Short-term Forecasts: The Transformation of US Presidential Elections in an Age of Polarization.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 289–92.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2004. “Forecasting the Presidential Vote in 2004: Placing Preference Polls in Context.” PS: Political Science & Politics 37 (4): 763–67.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan. 2010. “The Seats in Trouble Forecast of the 2010 Elections in the U.S. House.” PS: Political Science and Politics 43 (4):627–30.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan. 2014. “Issues in Presidential Election Forecasting: Election Margins, Incumbency and Model Credibility.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 289–92.Google Scholar
Cook, Charles E. Jr., and Wasserman, David. 2014. “Recalibrating Ratings for a New Normal.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 304–08.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2014. “Forecasting US Presidential Elections Using Economic and Nonecomomic Fundamentals.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 313–16.Google Scholar
Gallup. 2014. “Gallup Job Approval Center.” http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Approval-Center.aspx (June 26, 2014).
Graefe, Andreas, J. Armstrong, Scott, Jones, Randall J. Jr., and Cuzán, Alfred G.. 2014. “Accuracy of Combined Forecasts for the 2012 Presidential Election: The PollyVote.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 427–31.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Rice, Tom W.. 1984. “Forecasting Presidential Elections: A Comparison of Naive Models.” Political Behavior 6: 921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1992. Forecasting Elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Stegmaier, Mary. 2013. “The V-P Function Revisited: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after over 40 Years.” Public Choice, 157 (3): 367–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 2014. “US Presidential Election Forecasting: An Introduction.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 284–88.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Tien, Charles. 2008. “Forecasting Presidential Elections: When to Change the Model?International Journal of Forecasting 24 (2): 227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linzer, Drew A. 2014. “The Future of Election Forecasting: More Data, Better Technology.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 326–28.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Stuart. 2014. “Election Forecasting and Public Opinion Polls.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47 (2): 336–38.Google Scholar
Stegmaier, Mary, and Lewis-Beck, Michael S.. 2013. “Economic Voting.” In Oxford Bibliographies in Political Science, online, Ed. Valelly, Rick. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. “Table 2.6. Personal Income and its Disposition, Monthly.” http://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?ReqID=9&step=1#reqid=9&step=3&isuri=1&903=76 (June 26, 2014).

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 73 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Congressional Election Forecasting: Structure-X Models for 2014
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Congressional Election Forecasting: Structure-X Models for 2014
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Congressional Election Forecasting: Structure-X Models for 2014
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *