Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-n7pht Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-09T15:03:11.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The 1990 Congressional Election Results and the Fallacy That They Embodied an Anti-Incumbent Mood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

John R. Alford
Affiliation:
Rice University
John R. Hibbing
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Extract

Given all the hype in 1990 about an “anti-incumbent” mood that was supposed to have swept the electorate, it is not too surprising that immediately after the congressional elections of that year most pundits claimed to see clear evidence of this mood in the results. But it is surprising that now, as we approach the next election day, more relaxed and objective analysis has not corrected this erroneous view of what actually transpired in 1990. Thus, before this misconception becomes an indelible part of conventional wisdom, and before the events of 1992, which may include something closer to an authentic anti-incumbent mood, are compared to a mistaken view of the events of 1990, we would like to offer an alternative and, we would argue, more accurate interpretation of the 1990 congressional elections.

November 6, 1990 was to have been the day the fortifications of entrenched incumbents—relentless constituency service, massive warchests, and intimidation of prospective quality challengers—were overwhelmed by the poorly-armed but righteously indignant masses. These masses were incited by brave challengers who concocted clever taunts about the insular and haughty denizens of Washington castle life. These hated insiders, it was said, were surrounded by doting courtiers, undeserved privileges, and unbelievable treasures, and the outsiders were finally going to have their revenge.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan. 1991. “Throwing the Bums Back In: The 1990 Congressional Elections.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 1991.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report. 1990. “Warning Shots Fired by Voters More Mood Than Mandate.” 10 November: 37963800.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1991. “Divided Government, Strategic Politicians, and the 1990 Congressional Elections.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 1991.Google Scholar
Ladd, Everett Carll. 1990. “Public Opinion and the ‘Congress Problem,’Public Interest 100: 5767.Google Scholar
Time. 1990. “Keep the Bums In.” 19 November: 3242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar