Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-z8dg2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T01:16:12.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XIII.—Ions and Isotopes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

James Kendall
James Kendall
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh
Get access

Extract

The fact that the atomic weight of an element is not invariable, but that the same element may exist in two or more forms which are chemically identical even though their atomic weights differ, was first noted by Soddy (1910, p. 285) in connection with radioactive elements. A little later Thomson (1913) showed, by the method of positive ray analysis, that neon, with an average atomic weight of 20·2, was a mixture of two kinds of atoms with masses 20 and 22 respectively. The brilliant extension of this method of attack by Aston has established that the majority of the common elements are similarly inhomogeneous. Chlorine (35·457) is a mixture of Cl35 and Cl37; lead (207·22) exists in as many as eight forms, with atomic masses ranging from 203 to 210. These chemically-identical species of the same element with diverse masses are known as isotopes.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 57 , 1938 , pp. 182 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Haring, M. M., 1924. “The Separation of the Isotopes of Mercury by Electrolysis,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
Jette, E. R., 1927. “Mobility of Ions in Solution with particular reference to the Separation of Isotopes,” Phil. Mag., vol. iii, ser. 7, pp. 258–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, J., and Crittenden, E. D., 1923. “The Separation of Isotopes,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Wash., vol. ix, pp. 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, J., and White, J. F., 1924. “The Separation of Isotopes by the Ionic Migration Method,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Wash., vol. x, pp. 458–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, J., and Clarke, B. L., 1925. “The Separation of Rare Earths by the Ionic Migration Method,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Wash., vol. xi, pp. 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, J., and West, W., 1926. “An Attempted Separation of Hafnium and Zirconium by the Ionic Migration Method,” Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., vol. xlviii, pp. 2619–2626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, J., Jette, E. R., and West, W., 1926. “The Separation of Radium and of Mesothorium I from Barium by the Ionic Migration Method,” Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., vol. xlviii, pp. 3114–3117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, G. N., 1933. “Isotopes of Hydrogen,” Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., vol. lv, pp. 1297–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, G. N., and Macdonald, R. T., 1936. “The Separation of Lithium Isotopes,” Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., vol. lviii, pp. 2519–2524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, F. A., 1919. “Vapour Pressure and Affinity of Isotopes,” Phil. Mag., vol. xxxviii, ser. 6, pp. 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selwood, P. W., with Hopkins, B. S., 1929. “Observations on the Rare Earths. XXXI. Ionic Migration and Magnetism in the Separation of the Rare Earths,” Trans. Amer. Electrochem. Soc., vol. lv, pp. 59–73.Google Scholar
Soddy, F., 1911. “Radioactivity,” Chem. Soc. Ann. Reps., vol. vii, pp. 262–288.Google Scholar
Thomson, Sir J. J., 1913. “Rays of Positive Electricity,” Proc. Roy. Soc. London, vol. lxxxix A, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Washburn, E. W., and Urey, H. C., 1932. “Concentration of the H2 Isotope of Hydrogen by the Fractional Electrolysis of Water,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. Wash., vol. xviii, pp. 496–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washburn, E. W., Smith, E. R., and Frandsen, M., 1933. “The Isotopic Fractionation of Water,” Journ. Chem. Phys., vol. i, p. 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar