Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T19:12:18.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Fourierian Analysis of Phonographic Tracings of Vowels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

R. J. Lloyd
Get access

Extract

It is a great advantage and satisfaction to work from curves taken by the phonograph itself, because it is then possible to reproduce and verify by actual hearing the sound supposed to be represented by given curves. This ought always to be done, even with the phonograph, and the slightest change of timbre should be carefully noted; for the given curve represents not really the original sound, but the sound given back by the phonograph. Every plate or membrane vibrates more readily and strongly to some pitches than to others, and in a composite sound it is almost inevitable that some of its elements are recorded with more, and others with less, than their original relative force. Different vibrators hence yield quite different-looking phonograms for the same sound. In vowels it seems fortunately to happen that considerable changes in the relative force of the component vibrations may occur without altering the vowel. It is the pitch of the components which matters; and that is not altered by an efficient vibrator. Assuming a knowledge of the methods by which the record dug vertically into the phonographic cylinder is displayed horizontally for examination and analysis, we note that a satisfactory Fourierian analysis demands a sufficient number of measurements.

Type
Proceedings
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 22 , 1899 , pp. 97 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1899

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hensen, V..—“Gehör,” being vol. iii. pt. 2 of Hermann's Handbuch der Physiologie; Acoustic Principles, pp. 1–20; Analysis of Sounds, pp. 77–88.Google Scholar
Everett, .—Vibratory Motion and Sound (Longmans).Google Scholar
Donkin, .—Acoustics (Clar. Press), “Fourier's Theorem Proved,” pp. 65–71; “Fourier's Theorem Illustrated,” pp. 56–65.Google Scholar
Pipping, H..—“Ueber die Tonfarbe der Vocale” (Zs. für Biologie, vol. xxvii. p. 1), being detailed analyses of twenty-four vowel-phonograms;Google Scholar
Pipping, H..—“Zur Lehre von den Vocalklangen” Zs. für Biologie, vol. xxxi. pp. 524–583), containing controversy with Hermann as to real meaning of Fourierian analysis;Google Scholar
Pipping, H..—“Ueber die Theorie der Vocale” (Acta Societatis Scientiarum Fennieæ, vol. xx. pt. 11), replies to Lloyd (v. infra), and gives more analyses.Google Scholar
Hermann, L..—“Phonophotographische Untersuchungen,” (Pflülgers Archiv., vol. xlv. p. 582; xlvii. pp. 44, 347; liii. p. 1; lviii. p. 255), contain many analyses and much controversy about Fourierian analysis; No. 2 contains a method of lightening the labour of these analyses.Google Scholar
Hermann, L..—“Bemerkungen zur Vocalfrage” (Pflülgers Archiv., vol. xlviii. p. 181);Google Scholar
Hermann, L..—“Vocale im Telephon und Microphon” (Pflülgers Archiv., vol. xlviii. p. 543);Google Scholar
Hermann, L..—“Weitere Untersuchungen über das Wesen. der Vocale” (Pflülgers Archiv., vol. lx. p. 169), deals chiefly with short (German) vowels.Google Scholar
Lloyd, J..—“Reply to Pipping's Review of the Author's Articles on ‘Speech-Sounds’ in Phonetische Studien, 1890–2” (Zs. für französische Sprache, vol. xvi. p. 201);Google Scholar
Lloyd, J..—“The Genesis of Vowels” (Journ. of Anat., and Physiology, vol. xxxi. p. 233);Google Scholar
Lloyd, J..—“Interpretation of the Phonograms of Vowels” (Journ. of Anat. and Physiology, vol. xxxi. p. 240).Google Scholar