Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-xdx58 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T17:06:10.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1. On the Action of Uncrystallised Films upon Common and Polarised Light

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2015

Get access

Extract

Since the discovery of the polarisation of light by refraction, the action of a pile of transparent plates upon common and polarised light has not been studied by any of the writers on physical optics. It was believed that a pencil of common light was completely polarised in the plane of refraction when the plates were sufficiently numerous, no special notice having been taken of the light thrown back by reflexion into the transmitted and polarised beam. Sir John Herschel, indeed, had referred to it; but he remarks that “it mixes with the transmitted beam, and, being in an opposite plane, destroys a part of its polarisation.” So long ago as 1814, Sir David Brewster had shown that this reflected light is distinctly visible as light polarised by reflexion; but owing to the difficulty of procuring very thin plates of glass with perfectly parallel surfaces, it was impossible to ascertain the true character of the oppositely polarised pencils.

Type
Proceedings 1859-60
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1862

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 273 note * Treatise on Light, Art, 868.

page 273 note † Phil. Trans., 1814, p. 226.