Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T04:08:18.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XX.—Quantitative Studies on the Invertebrate Fauna of Sandy and Stony Substrates in the River Endrick, Scotland*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

Peter S. Maitland
Peter S. Maitland
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow.
Get access

Synopsis

Monthly quantitative samples of the invertebrate fauna were taken from two stations in the River Endrick over a period of fifteen months; the substrate at one station in the lower reaches was sandy, whilst that at the other in the middle reaches was stony. The fauna at these stations differed qualitatively, but showed certain quantitative similarities, especially with regard to seasonal change. The fauna of stones is richer, and much more varied than that of sand, though both substrates appear to be unstable and may be drastically affected by spates. The average standing crop of the invertebrate fauna during 1960 was found to be 8 g. per square m. in sand and 16 g. per square m. in stones. Compared with the few other results which are available for rivers elsewhere in the world these figures would indicate that the standing crops of these substrates in the River Endrick are of intermediate richness.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , 1964 , pp. 277 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was assisted in publication by a grant from the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland.

References

References to Literature

Allen, K. R., 1941. “Studies on the Biology of the Early Stages of the Salmon (Salmo salar). 2. Feeding Habits”, J. Anim. Ecol., 10, 47–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, K. R., 1951. “The Horokiwi Stream: a Study of a Trout Population”, Fish. Bull., Wellington, N.Z., 10, 1–231.Google Scholar
Badcock, R. M., 1949. “Studies in Stream Life in Tributaries of the Welsh Dee”, J. Anim. Ecol., 18, 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badcock, R. M., 1953. “Comparative Studies in the Populations of Streams”, Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottning., 35, 38–50.Google Scholar
Berg, K., 1938. “Studies on the Bottom Animals of Esrom Lake” K. Danske Vidensk. Selsk., 8, 1–255.Google Scholar
Berg, K., 1948. “Biological Studies on the River Susaa”, Folia Limnol. Scand., 4, 1–318.Google Scholar
Frost, W. E., 1942. “River Liffey Survey IV. The Fauna of the Submerged ‘mosses’ in an Acid and an Alkaline Water”, Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., B, 47, 293–369.Google Scholar
Gaufin, A. R., Harris, E. K., and Walter, H. J., 1956. “A Statistical Evaluation of Stream Bottom Sampling Data obtained from Three Standard Samplers”, Ecology, 37, 643–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, A. D., and Elsworth, J. F., 1958. “Hydrobiological. Studies on the Great Berg River, Western Cape Province”, Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Afr., 35, 125–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heron, J., and Mackereth, F. J. H., 1955. “The Estimation of Calcium and Magnesium in Natural Waters, with Particular Reference to those of Low Alkalinity”, Mitt. Int. Ver. Limnol., 5, 1–7.Google Scholar
Heuts, M. J., 1946. “De Statistische Waarde van de Methode van Petersen voor het Quantitatief Onderzoek der Bodemfauna”, Biol. Jaarb., 13, 200–209.Google Scholar
Horton, P. A., 1961. “The Bionomics of Brown Trout in a Dartmoor Stream”, J. Anim. Ecol., 30, 311–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hynes, H. B. N., 1961. “The Invertebrate Fauna of a Welsh Mountain Stream”, Arch. Hydrobiol. (Plankt.), 57, 344–388.Google Scholar
Idyll, C. P., 1943. “Bottom Fauna of Portions of the Cowichan River, B.C.”, J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can., 6, 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonasson, P. M., 1955. “The Efficiency of sieving Techniques for Sampling Freshwater Bottom Fauna”, Oikos, 6, 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagler, K. F., 1949. Studies in Freshwater Fishery Biology, Ann Arbor. Michigan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, J. W., 1939. “Comments on the Adequacy of Accepted Stream Bottom Sampling Technique”, Trans. 4th N. Amer. Wild Life Conf., 288–295.Google Scholar
Macan, T. T., 1949. “Survey of a Moorland Fishpond”, J. Anim. Ecol., 18, 160–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macan, T. T., 1958 a. “Methods of Sampling the Bottom Fauna in Stony-Streams”, Mitt. Int. Ver. Limnol., 8, 1–21.Google Scholar
Macan, T. T., 1958 b. “The Temperature of a Small Stony Stream”, Hydrobiologia, 12, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, P. S., 1962. “The Fauna of the River Endrick in Relation to Local Water Use”, Wat. & Waste Treatm., 9, 78–86.Google Scholar
Maitland, P. S., 1963. “Ecological Studies on the Fauna of the River Endrick”, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Moon, H. P., 1934. “An Investigation of the Littoral Region of Windermere”, J. Anim. Ecol., 3, 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, N. C., 1956. “The Biology of Leptocerus aterrimus Steph. with Reference to its availability as a Food for Trout”, J. Anim. Ecol., 25, 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, K., 1954. “Investigations on the Organic Drift in North Swedish Streams”, Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottning., 35, 133–148.Google Scholar
Needham, P. R., 1934. “Quantitative Studies of Stream Bottom Foods”, Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc, 64, 238–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neill, R. M., 1938. “The Food and Feeding of the Brown Trout (Salmo trutta L.) in Relation to the Organic Environment”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 59, 481–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliff, W. D., 1960. “Hydrobiological Studies on the Tugela River System. Part 1. The Main Tugela River”, Hydrobiologia, 14, 281–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percival, E., and Whitehead, H., 1929. “A Quantitative Study of the Fauna of some Types of Stream-bed”, J. Ecol., 17, 282–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slack, H. D., 1957. Studies on Loch Lomond. I. Glasgow.Google Scholar
Suckling, E. V., 1944. The Examination of Water and Water Supplies. London.Google Scholar
Surber, E. W., 1936. “Rainbow Trout and Bottom Fauna Production in One Mile of Stream”, Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc., 66, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weerekoon, A. C. J., 1956. “Studies on the Biology of Loch Lomond. 1. The Benthos of Auchentullich Bay”, Bull. Ceylon Fish., 7, 1–94.Google Scholar
Whitehead, H., 1935. “An ecological Study of the Invertebrate Fauna of a Chalk Stream near Great Driffield, Yorkshire”, J. Anim. Ecol., 4, 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar