Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:10:18.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X.—An Apparatus for Following the Course of Gaseous Exchange by Living Tissue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

G. F. Asprey
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Aberdeen
Get access

Extract

The apparatus which one selects for the study of gaseous exchange by living tissue is largely determined by the nature of the problem with which one is confronted. Choice usually lies between those methods where a continuous stream of air is passed over the respiring material and alteration in its carbon dioxide content measured, or those in which the oxygen or carbon dioxide content of the air surrounding the respiring material in a closed system is periodically determined. The former system is frequently used when one is only concerned with relatively large quantities of carbon dioxide. The gas, which is usually absorbed by passing the air through solutions of sodium or barium hydroxide contained in Pettenkoffer tubes or Reiset towers, may be subsequently determined by titration of the alkali with standard acid. This arrangement is much used owing to the readiness with which it may be set up employing normal laboratory equipment. The labour involved can, however, be considerably curtailed by adopting the electrical conductivity method for determining carbon dioxide. This has been described by Newton (1935). It may be made more accurate and more sensitive than the titration methods and, moreover, enable determinations to be made quickly and at short intervals of time. Leach (1944) has made the method automatically recording.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Asprey, G. F., and Bond, G., 1941. “Respiration of Leguminous Root Nodules”, Nature, CXLVII, 675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, C. W., 1934. The Conductivity of Solutions, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, M., 1934. Manometric Methods, Camb. Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, M., and Elliot, P., 1930. “The Use of the Barcroft Apparatus for the Measurement of Tissue Respiration”, Biochem. Journ., XXIV, 820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenn, W. O., 1926. “A New Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Minute Amounts of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide”, Amer. Journ. Physiol., Lxxxiv, 110.Google Scholar
Leach, W., 1931. “On a Simple Electric Immersion Heater for Constant Temperature Baths”, Ann. Bot., XLV, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, W., 1932. “Further Experimental Methods in Connection with the Use of the Katharometer for the Measurement of Respiration”, Ann. Bot., XLVI, 583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, W., Moir, D. R., and Batho, H. F., 1944. “An Improved Arrangement for the Measurement of Carbon Dioxide Output of Respiring Plant Material by the Electrical Conductivity Method”, Canad, Journ. Res., C22, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munzer, E., and Neumann, W., 1917. “Zer Verwendung des Differential Apparates, von Barcroft, Biochem. Zeit., LXXXI, 319331.Google Scholar
Newton, R. G., 1935. “An Improved Electrical Conductivity Method for the Estimation of Carbon Dioxide and other Reactive Gases”, Ann. Bot., XLIX, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, A. L., and Winegarden, H. M., 1927. “Determination of Carbon Dioxide in Fermenting Mixtures”, Journ. Biol. Chem., LXXIV, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoehr, H. A., and McGhee, J. M., 1923. “Studies in Plant Respiration and Photosynthesis”, Carnegie Inst. Wash., Pub. No. 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, W., and Leach, W., 1931. “On the Use of the Katharometer for the Measurement of Respiration”, Ann. Bot., XLV, 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G. P., 1938. “A Manometric Method for Measuring the Respiration of Snails”, Journ. Exp. Biol., XV, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar