Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:42:58.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A review of biological and geomorphological processes involved in the initiation and development of incipient foredunes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

Patrick A. Hesp
Patrick A. Hesp
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, N.S.W., Australia, 2109
Get access

Synopsis

The evolution, ecological processes, aerodynamics, and morphology of incipient or new foredunes on the upper beach is reviewed. Four types of incipient foredunes may be distinguished, namely: type 1, those initiated by shadow dune formation within zones of discrete individual pioneer annuals (e.g. Cakile spp.), and perennials (e.g. Spinifex spp.; Ammophila spp.); type 2, those initiated by dunelet or hummock formation within discrete colonies of perennial grasses and herbs; type 3, those initiated by sand deposition within laterally extensive colonies of pioneer seedlings; and type 4, those initiated by sand deposition within a laterally extensive plant rhizome cover.

Type 1 dunes are dominated by high, local flow deceleration and 3-D flow separation. Shadow dunes form within and downwind of the discrete plants. If colonised by annual plants, invasion by perennial plants is necessary for survival. Later lateral plant spread and accretion produces hummocky terraces and ridges. Type 2 dunes (dunelets) are characterised by local landward flow deceleration and marginal high velocity side flows. Sand deposition results in the formation of low, discrete, semi-circular convex mounds (seedlings), or more elongate hummocks and mounds (rhizomes). Types 3 and 4 dunes are characterised by laterally extensive, often homogeneous vegetation canopies. High canopies display more rapid landward flow deceleration than low canopies, thus narrow, asymmetric ridges and longer convex ridges result respectively. High plant densities result in rapid down-canopy flow deceleration, maximum traction load retardation and the formation of narrow asymmetric ridges. Dune height decreases and dune length increases as plant densities decrease. Maximum deposition zones occur for each wind velocity range. Whether ramp, terrace or ridge morphologies are formed depends on mode of beach colonisation, plant density and distribution, sand volume, wind speed, and plant species type and morphology.

A range of variables which affect foredune morphology and evolution, including plant canopy density, height and distribution, wind velocity, and various ecological environmental processes are examined.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 96: Coastal Sand Dunes , 1989 , pp. 181 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. R. L. 1982. Sedimentary Structures: Their Character and Physical Basis, (Devel. in Sedimentol., v. 30B): 644 pp.Google Scholar
Anderson, C., and Taylor, K. 1979. Some factors affecting the growth of two populations of Festuca rubra var. arenaria on the dunes of Blakeney Point, Norfolk. In Ecological Processes in Coastal Environments, eds Jeffries, R. L., & Davy, A. J., pp. 129–144. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Bagnold, R. A. 1954. The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes. London: Chapman and Hall. 265 pp.Google Scholar
Bird, E. C. F. 1988. The origin of foredunes on the coast of Victoria. Australia. Journal of Coastal Research 4, 181–192.Google Scholar
Bigarella, J. J. 1972. Aeolian environments: their characteristics, recognition and importance. Society Econ. Paleontol. Mineral. Spec. Publication, No. 16, 12–62.Google Scholar
Bigarella, J. J., Becker, R. N., & Duarte, G. M. 1969. Coastal dune structures from Parana (Brazil). Marine Geology 7, 5–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, A. L., and Aase, J. K. 1988. The use of perennial herbaceous barriers for water conservation and the protection of soils and crops. Journal of Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22/23, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, T. E. T. 1952. Elymus arenarius. Biological Flora of the British Isles, Journal of Ecology 40, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. W. G. 1977. The rate and pattern of sediment interchange between beach and dune. In Coastal Sedimentology, ed. Tanner, W. F., pp. 3–34. Geol. Dept Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, Fla.Google Scholar
Carter, R. W. G. 1988. Coastal Environments. London: Academic Press, 617 pp.Google Scholar
Carter, R. W. G., and Wilson, P., (in press). The geomorphological, ecological and pedological development of coastal foredunes at Magilligan Point, Northern Ireland. In Coastal Dunes: Processes and Morphology, eds Nordstrom, K., Psuty, N., & Carter, R. W. G. J., Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. S. 1958. Coastal sand dunes of Oregon and Washington. Geological Society of America Memoir 72, 168 pp.Google Scholar
Cooper, W. S. 1967. Coastal dunes of California, Geological Society of America Memoir 104, 131 pp.Google Scholar
Cowles, H. C. 1899. The ecological relations of the vegetation on the sand dunes of Lake Michigan. Botanical Gazette 27, 95–117; 167–202; 281–308; 361–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. L. 1957. The importance of cut and fill in the development of sand beach ridges, Australian Journal of Science 20, 105–111.Google Scholar
Davies, J. L. 1974. The coastal sediment compartment. Australian Geographical Studies 12, 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. L. 1977. The Coast. In Australia. A Geography, ed. Jeans, D. M., pp. 134–151. Sydney: Sydney Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Davies, J. L. 1980. Geographical Variation in Coastal Development, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Finnigan, J. J. 1979. Turbulence in waving wheat II. Structure of momentum transfer. Boundary-layer Meteorology 16, 213–236.Google Scholar
Gemmell, A. R., Greig-Smith, P., & Gimmingham, C. H. 1953. A note on the behaviour of Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link in relation to sand dune formation. Transactions of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 36, 132–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, V. 1973. Internal geometry and origin of vegetated coastal sand dunes. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 43, 1128–1142.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, V. 1978. Coastal dunes. In Coastal Sedimentary Environments, ed. Davis, R. A. Jr., 4, pp. 171–230. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, P. J., & Godfrey, M. M. 1976. Barrier Island Ecology of Cape Lookout National Seashore and Vicinity, North Carolina. Nat. Park Ser. Sci. Monograph Ser. No. 9, 160 pp.Google Scholar
Godfrey, P. J., Leatherman, S. P., and Zaremba, R. 1979. A geobotanical approach to classification of barrier beach systems. In Barrier Islands from the Gulf of St. Lawrence to the Gulf of Mexico, ed. Leatherman, S. P., pp. 99–126. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gooding, E. G. B. 1947. Observations on the sand dunes of Barbados, W. Indies. Journal of Ecology 34, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisler, G. M., & Dewalle, D. R. 1988. Effects of windbreak structure on wind flow. Journal of Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22/23, 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesp, P. A. 1981. The formation of shadow dunes. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 51, 101–111.Google Scholar
Hesp, P. A. 1982. Dynamics and Morphology of Foredunes in South East Australia. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Sydney.Google Scholar
Hesp, P. A. 1983. Morphodynamics of incipient foredunes in N.S.W., Australia. In Eolian Sediments and Processes, eds Brookfield, M. E., & Ahlbrandt, T. S., pp. 325–342. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesp, P. A. 1984a. Foredune formation in Southeast Australia. In Coastal Geomorphology in Australia, ed. Thorm, B. G., pp. 69–97. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hesp, P. A. 1984b. The formation of sand “beach ridges” and foredunes. Search 15, 289–291.Google Scholar
Hesp, P. A. 1988a. Foredune morphology, dynamics and structures. In Aeolian Sediments, eds Hesp, P. A., & Fryberger, S., pp. 17–41. Journal of Sedimentary Geology Special Issue 55, 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesp, P. A. 1988b. Surzone, beach and foredune interactions on the Australian south east coast. Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue 3, 15–25.Google Scholar
Hesp, P. A., (in press). Ecological processes and plant adaptations on coastal dunes. Journal of Arid Environments Special Issue.Google Scholar
Hesp, P. A., Gibbs, D. G., & King, J. W. 1981. Spatial variation of Ammophila arenaria density and the formation of foredunes. Proc. 5th Aust. Conf. Coastal Engr., 113–114.Google Scholar
Hesp, P. A., Gibbs, D. G., & Thom, B. G., (in press). Geomorphology and evolution of Transgressive Dunefields. In Coastal Dunes: Processes and Morphology, eds Nordstrom, K., Psuty, N. K., & Carter, R. W. G., Chichester: J. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Hill, R. D. 1966. Changes in beach form at Sri Pantal, Northeast Johore, Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Geography 23, 19–27.Google Scholar
Hogbom, I. 1923. Ancient inland dunes of Northern and Middle Europe. Geografiska Annaler 5, 113–242.Google Scholar
King, C. A. M. 1972. Beaches and Coasts. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Kotoda, K. 1979. Wind profile and aerodynamic parameters above and within a plant canopy. Ann. Rep. Inst. Geosci., Univ. Tsukuba, No. 5, 11–14.Google Scholar
Kuhlman, H. 1959. Quantitative measurements of aeolian sand transport. Geografiska Tidsskrift 57, 51–74.Google Scholar
Laing, C. C. 1958. Studies in the ecology of Amophila breviligulata. I. Seedling survival and its relation to population increase and dispersal. Botanical Gazette 119, 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Land, L. S. 1964. Aeolian cross-bedding in the beach dune environment, Sapelo Island, Georgia. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 34, 389–394.Google Scholar
Leatherman, S. P. 1979. Barrier Island Handbook. Nat. Park. Serv. Coop. Res. Unit. Univ. Mass., Amherst, 101 pp.Google Scholar
Lettau, H. 1969. Note on aerodynamic roughness-parameter estimation on the basis of roughness-element description. Journal of Applied Meteorology 8, 828–832.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, I. F., Monteith, J. L., Penman, H. L., & Szeicz, G. 1964. The plant and its environment. Meteorol. Rundsch. 17, 97–101.Google Scholar
Lubke, R. A., Gess, F. W., & Bruton, M. N. 1988. A Field Guide to the Eastern Cape Coast. Grahamstown Centre of the Wildlife Soc. South Africa (pub.), 520 pp.Google Scholar
Maun, M. A. 1984. Colonizing ability of Ammophila breviligulata through vegetative regeneration. Journal of Ecology 72, 565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, E. F., & Hayes, M. O. 1962. Dune cross-bedding on Mustang Island, Texas. Bulletin of the American Association of Petrol. Geol. 46, 546–551.Google Scholar
McKenzie, P. 1958. The development of sand beach ridges. Australian Journal of Science 20, 213–214.Google Scholar
Melton, F. A. 1940. A tentative classification of sand dunes: its application to dune history in the Southern High Plains. Journal of Geology 48, 113–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulhearn, P. J., & Finnigan, J. J. 1978. Turbulent flow over a very rough, random surface. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 15, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oertel, G. F., & Larsen, M. 1976. Developmental sequences in Georgia coastal dunes and distributions of dune plants. Bulletin of the Georgia Academy of Science 34, 35–48.Google Scholar
Olson, J. S. 1958a. Lake Michigan dune development. 2. Plants as agents and tools in geomorphology. Journal of Geology 66, 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, J. S. 1958b. Rates of succession and soil changes on southern Lake Michigan sand dunes. Botanical Gazette 119, 125–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oosting, H. J. 1954. Ecological processes and vegetation of the maritime strand in the United States. Botanical Review 20, 226–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, W. R. 1975. Sediment mobility and erosion on a multibarred foreshore (S.W. Lancashire, U.K.). In Nearshore Sediment Dynamics and Sedimentation eds, Hails, J., & Carr, A., pp. 151–178. Chichester: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Prandtl, L. 1952. Essentials of Fluid Dynamics. London: Blackie and Son Ltd.Google Scholar
Price, W. I. J. 1961. The effects of the characteristics of snow fences on the quantity and shape of the deposited snow. International Association for Scientific Hydrology, Pub. 54, 89–98.Google Scholar
Quinn, C. M. 1977. Sand Dunes. Formation, Erosion and Management. Dublin: An Foras Forbartha.Google Scholar
Ranwell, D. S. 1972. Ecology of Salt Marshes and Sand Dunes. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Raupach, M. R., Thorn, A. S., & Edwards, I. 1980. A wind-tunnel study of turbulent flow close to regularly arrayed rough surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 18, 373–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reineck, H. E., & Singh, I. B. 1975. Depositional Sedimentary Environments. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Ridley, H. N. 1930. The Dispersal of Plants throughout the World. London: L. Reeve and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Rozema, J., Bijwaard, P., Prast, G., & Broekman, R. 1985. Ecophysiological adaptations of coastal halophytes from foredunes and salt marshes. Vegetatio 62, 499–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, E. 1952. Downs and Dunes, Their Plant Life and Environment. London: G. Bell and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Sarre, R. 1989. The morphological significance of vegetation and relief on coastal foredune processes. Zeilschrift für Geomorphologie N.F. Supplement Band. 73, 17–31.Google Scholar
Sellers, W. D. 1965. Physical Climatology. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M. J. 1970. Coastal Geomorphology of the Myall Lakes Area, New South Wales. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Sydney (Unpubl.).Google Scholar
Shepherd, M. J. 1981. The Rockingham coastal barrier system of Western Australia. Western Geographer 5, 67–81.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M. J. 1987. Sandy beach ridge system profiles as indicators of changing coastal processes. Proc. 14th N.Z. Geog. Conf. & 56th ANZAAS Congress, 106–112.Google Scholar
Short, A. D., & Hesp, P. A. 1982. Wave, beach and dune interactions in southeastern Australia. Marine Geology 48, 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steers, J. A. 1964. The Coastline of England and Wales. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Taque, G. C. 1947. The Post-Glacial geology of the Grand Marais Embayment in Berrien County, Michigan. In Occasional Papers for 1946 of the Geology of Michigan, Pub. 45, Geol. Ser. 38, Pub. by Dept. Cons, and Geol. Surv.l Div: Part 1, 1–81.Google Scholar
Thorn, A. S. 1972. Momentum, mass and heat exchange of vegetation. Q. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 98, 124–134.Google Scholar
Thorn, B. G. 1964. Origin of sand beach ridges. Australian Journal of Science 26, 351.Google Scholar
Thorn, B. G. 1965. Late Quaternary coastal morphology of the Port Stephens-Myall Lakes area, N.S.W. Journal of the Royal Society of N.S.W. 98, 23–36.Google Scholar
Van Dieren, J. W. 1934. Organogene Dunenbildung. Martins Nijhoff Haag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkinson, A. R., Huiskes, A. H. L., & Noble, J. C. 1979. The demography of sand dune species with contrasting life cycles. In Ecological Processes in Coastal Environments, eds Jeffries, R. L., & Davy, A. J., pp. 95–112. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williams, G. 1964. Some aspects of the aeolian saltation load. Sedimentology 3, 257–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, A. J., Folkes, B. F., Hope-Simpson, J. F., & Yemm, E. W. 1959. Braunton Burrows: The dune system and its vegetation. I and II. Journal of Ecology 47, 1–24 and 249–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhouse, W. W. Jr., 1978. Dune Building and Stabilisation with Vegetation. U.S. Army Corps, of Engrs., Spec. Rept., No. 3, 112 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhouse, W. W. Jr., Seneca, E. D., & Broome, S. W. 1977. Effects of species on dune grass growth. International Journal of Biometrology 21, 256–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, L. D. 1970. The influence of sediment availability on patterns of beach ridge development in the vicinity of the Shoalhaven River Delta, N.S.W. Australian Geography 11, 327–335.Google Scholar
Zenkovich, V.P., 1967. Processes of Coastal Development. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar