Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:53:38.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fish processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

R. Hardy
Affiliation:
Torry Research Station, PO Box 31, 135 Abbey Road, Aberdeen, AB9 8DG
Get access

Synopsis

This paper gives a brief description of the United Kingdom's fish processing industry and possible future trends. Although the consumption offish in the United Kingdom is relatively modest, about 100 species are used to satisfy this demand. Processing such a diverse resource is difficult and this is exacerbated by uncertainties of supply, seasonal quality fluctuations and the rapid spoilage changes that occur when fish are kept at ambient temperatures.

The food market is highly competitive, which means that processors must make the best possible use of the resource to reduce costs and yet stimulate demand by improving the end product. This is often difficult to do using traditional practices, and so the industry has had to develop novel processing methods to make both conventional products and new ones that will stimulate demand. In the past the specialist retailer, the fishmonger, could be depended upon not only to encourage the purchase of fish but also to provide the finishing touches and to give some instruction on how to cook it. Stimulation of interest and assistance cannot be given so readily in retailing through supermarkets, and so the processor has had to give more attention to presentation, packaging and ensuring that the product can be cooked with little further preparation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon, . 1982. Enzyme is found to extend shelf life. Fishg News int. 21, 20.Google Scholar
Bolt, T. R. 1980. Supercritical gas extraction. Chemy Ind. 6, 228232.Google Scholar
Cann, D. C., Smith, G. L. and Houston, N. C. 1983. Further studies on marine fish stored under modified atmosphere packaging. Aberdeen: Torry Research Station.Google Scholar
Connell, J. J. and Hardy, R. 1982. Trends in Fish Utilization. Farnham, Surrey: Fishing News Books.Google Scholar
Early, J. C. and Stroud, G. D. 1978. Easy Picking. Fishg News int. 17, 56, 57, 60.Google Scholar
Elias, P. S. and Cohen, A. J. 1983. Recent Advances in Food Irradiation. Amsterdam: Elsevier Biomedical.Google Scholar
Graham, J. and Mair, S. 19791980. The design and performance of a continuous air blast freezer. Proc. Inst. Refrig. 76, 1321.Google Scholar
Hardy, R. 1980. Fish Lipids. Part 2. In Advances in Fish Science and Technology, ed. Connell, J. J., pp. 103110. Farnham, Surrey: Fishing News Books.Google Scholar
Hobbs, G. 1982. In Fish Handling and Processing, eds. Aitken, A., Mackie, I. M., Merritt, J. H. and Windsor, M. L., pp. 2027. Edinburgh: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Household Food Consumption and Expenditure 1982. Annual Report of the National Food Survey Committee. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Howgate, P. 1983. Quality of deboned flesh. In Sensory quality in frozen foods and beverages: definition, measurement and control, eds. Williams, A. A. and Aitken, R. K. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
Keay, J. N. and Whittle, K. J. 1980. New look for fish. Fd Mf, May.Google Scholar
Keay, J. N. 1982. Retort pouch processing offish products. Infofish Marketing Digest 4, 2832.Google Scholar
Keay, J. N. 1984. Fish mince technology and applications. Wld Fishg 33, 45.Google Scholar
Kelman, J. H. 1982. In Fish Handling and Processing, eds. Aitken, A., Mackie, I. M., Merritt, J. H. and Windsor, M. L., pp. 2841. Edinburgh: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Lopez, A. 1981. A complete course in canning. Baltimore, Maryland: Canning Trade.Google Scholar
Love, R. M. 1980. Biological factors affecting processing and utilization. In Advances in Fish Science and Technology, ed. Connell, J. J., pp. 130138. Farnham, Surrey: Fishing News Books.Google Scholar
Mackie, I. M., Hardy, R. and Hobbs, G. 1971. Fermented Fish Products. FAO Fisheries Report No. 100. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Myers, M. 1983. Time temperature studies in the distribution of fresh fish in summer. Sea Fish Industry Authority Technical Report 228. Edinburgh: Sea Fish Industry Authority.Google Scholar
Scottish Sea Fisheries Statistical Tables 1982, 1983. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland. Edinburgh: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Sea Fisheries Statistical Tables 1982. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Strom, T. 1980. Pilot plant production of capelin mince. In Proceedings oj 3rd National Technical Seminar on Mechanical Recovery and Utilisation of Fish Flesh, Raleigh, N. Carolina, ed. Martin, R. E., pp. 216223. Washington: National Fisheries Institute.Google Scholar
Suzuki, T. 1981. Fish and Krill Protein Processing Technology. London: Applied Science Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, K. J. 1983. Food Technology Applied to Underutilised Species of Fish. Institute of Food Science and Technology Proceedings, Minisymposium. Fish 17, 5968.Google Scholar
Windsor, M. and Barlow, S. 1981. Introduction to fishery by-products. Farnham, Surrey: Fishing News Books.Google Scholar