Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T14:16:05.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of oxygen and nitrate on ammonium uptake kinetics and adenylate pools in Phalaris arundinacea L. and Glyceria maxima (Hartm.) Holmb

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

H. Brix
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Ecology, University of Aarhus, Nordlandsvej 68, DK-8240 Risskov, Denmark
B. Lorenzen
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Ecology, University of Aarhus, Nordlandsvej 68, DK-8240 Risskov, Denmark
J. T. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
H.-H. Schierup
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Ecology, University of Aarhus, Nordlandsvej 68, DK-8240 Risskov, Denmark
B. K. Sorrell
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Ecology, University of Aarhus, Nordlandsvej 68, DK-8240 Risskov, Denmark
Get access

Synopsis

We studied the effects of oxygen (aerated versus O2 depleted ∼0.5 mg 1−1 O2) and nitrate (none versus 10 μmol 1−1) on the ammonium uptake kinetics and adenylate pools in two wetland plants differing in their degree of flood tolerance (Phalaris arundinacea L. and Glyceria maxima (Hartm.) Holmb.). The study was performed as a random block design in a growth chamber. The -uptake kinetics were estimated by using a computerised nonlinear parameter estimation procedure to fit the differential form of a modified Michaelis–Menten model to solution depletion curves. The uptake kinetics for differed between the two species: Vmax was significantly higher for P. arundinacea (24.7 to 29.6 μmol h−1 g−1 root dry weight) than for G. maxima (4.6–10.3 μmol h−1 g−1 root dry weight). The concentration at which uptake ceases (Cmin) was 0.2 to 0.5 μmol 1−1 for P. arundinacea and significant higher (1.1–2.7 μmol 1−1) for G. maxima.Km varied between 3.1 and 6.2 μmol 1−1 for P. arundinacea, and 1.6 and 3.0 μmol 1−1 for G. maxima. The different uptake kinetics of the two species reflect the different structure of their root systems: P. arundinacea has an extensive root system consisting of many thin roots whereas G. maxima has fewer but thicker roots. The uptake kinetics also suggest that P. arundinacea is adapted to growing at lower ambient concentrations than G. maxima. Oxygen had no consistent effect on uptake kinetics. However, the plants that had in the nutrient solution as well as had slightly higher Vmax values and lower Cmin and Km values than those without . Thus, both species were able to sustain their uptake characteristics at low external O2 concentrations, probably because of internal aeration through the air-space tissue of the plants. Nitrate deprivation also lowered the energy charge ratio and adenine nucleotide content in roots. The roots recovered quickly from deprivation once was resupplied. The stresses imposed by partially O2-depleted conditions and lack of nitrate were therefore relatively mild and reversible. It seems that the inherent aerenchyma development under aerated conditions in these species is sufficient to maintain adequate root oxygenation under partially O2-depleted conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, D. E. 1968. Energy charge of adenylate pool as a regulatory parameter: Interaction with feedback modifiers. Biochemistry 7, 4030–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, S. A. 1979. Growth requirements for nutrients in relation to demand at the root surface. In Harley, J. L. & Russell, R. S. (Eds) The soil-root interface, pp. 520. London, New York, San Francisco: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bard, Y. 1967. Non-linear parameters estimation and programming. New York: SHARE Program Library, IBM 360D-13.6.003. IBM New York Scientific Center Publication.Google Scholar
Bradley, P. M. & Morris, J. T. 1990. Influence of oxygen and sulfide concentration on nitrogen uptake kinetics in Spartina alterniflora. Ecology 71, 282–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brix, H., Sorrell, B. K. & Orr, P. T. 1992. Internal pressurization and convective gas flow in some emergent freshwater macrophytes. Limnology and Oceanography 37, 1420–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheeseman, J. M. & Hanson, J. B. 1979. Energy-linked potassium influx as related to cell potential in corn roots. Plant Physiology 64, 842845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ching, T. M., Hedtke, S. & Garay, A. E. 1975. Energy state of wheat leaves in ammonium nitrate-treated plants. Life Sciences 16, 603–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claassen, N. & Barber, S. A. 1974. A method for characterizing the relation between nutrient concentration and flux into roots of intact plants. Plant Physiology 54, 564–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarkson, D. T. 1985. Factors affecting mineral nutrient acquisition by plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 36, 77115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, D. T. & Hanson, J. B. 1980. The mineral nutrition of higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 31, 239–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, R. M. M. 1992. Oxygen availability as an ecological limit to plant distribution. Advances in Ecological Research 23, 93185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delistraty, D. A. & Hershner, C. 1983. Determination of adenine nucleotide levels in Zostera marina (eelgrass). Journal of Applied Biochemistry 5, 404–19.Google Scholar
Doddema, H. & Telkamp, G. P. 1979. Uptake of nitrate by mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana, disturbed in uptake or reduction of nitrate. II. Kinetics. Physiologia Plantarum 45, 332–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, M. C. 1991. Oxygen deficiency in the root environment and plant mineral nutrition. In Jackson, M. B., Davies, D. D. & Lambers, H. (Eds) Plant life under oxygen deprivation, pp. 303–16. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing bv.Google Scholar
Drew, M. C. & Sisworo, E. J. 1979. The development of waterlogging damage in young barley plants in relation to plant nutrient status and changes in soil properties. The New Phytologist 82, 301–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, M. C., Sisworo, E. J. & Saker, L. R. 1979. Alleviation of waterlogging damage to young barley plants by application of nitrate and a synthetic cytokinin, and comparison between the effects of waterlogging, nitrogen deficiency and root excision. The New Phytologist 82, 315–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. H. & Barber, S. A. 1976. Phosphorus uptake rate of soybean roots as influenced by plant age, root trimming and solution P concentration. Agronomy Journal 68, 973–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Novo, F. & Crawford, R. M. M. 1973. Soil aeration, nitrate reduction and flooding tolerance in higher plants. The New Phytologist 72, 1031–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinn, G. & Eidenbock, M. P. 1972. Extraction, purification, and estimation of ATP from leaves, floral buds, and immature fruits of cotton. Analytical Biochemistry 50, 8997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendelssohn, I. A. & McKee, K. L. 1981. Determination of adenine nucleotide levels and adenylate energy charge ratio in two Spartina species. Aquatic Botany 11, 3755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelssohn, I. A. & McKee, K. L. 1985. The effect of nutrients on adenine nucleotide levels and the adenylate energy charge ratio in Spartina alterniflora and Spartina patens. Plant, Cell and Environment 8, 213–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, P. 1973. Multiphasic uptake in plants II. Mineral cations, chloride, and boric acid. Physiologia Plantarum 29, 298354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, A. 1974. Gramineernes udbredelse i Danmark. Spontane og naturaliserede arter. Botanisk Tidsskrift 68, 179343.Google Scholar
Saglio, P. H., Raymond, P. & Pradet, A. 1980. Metabolic activity and energy charge of excised maize root tips under anoxia: control by soluble sugars. Plant Physiology 66, 1053–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smirnoff, N. & Crawford, R. M. M. 1983. Variation in the structure and response to flooding of root aerenchyma in some wetland plants. Annals of Botany 51, 237249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar