Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:58:02.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ecology and Zoogeography of some Polychaeta Representatives of the Abyssal Pacific

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

R. Ya. Levenstein
R. Ya. Levenstein
Affiliation:
P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Get access

Extract

Intensive oceanographic research during the past 20 years has given new data on the distribution of the deep-sea bottom fauna, thus making possible the establishment of basic distribution laws. These new data on the composition and distribution of the deep-sea benthos have been used to study the relationship of both the whole bottom fauna and its separate groups to the peculiar environmental conditions of the abyssal ocean. In particular, recent work on polychaetes has shown the existence of a specific abyssal fauna among this most widely distributed oceanic group

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 73: Challenger Expedition Centenary Proceedings 2 , 1972 , pp. 171 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References To Literature

Birstein, Ya. A., 1960. The family Ischnomesidae (Crustacea, Isopoda, Asellota) in the northwestern part of the Pacific and the problem of amphiboreal and bipolar distribution of the deepsea fauna. Zool. Zh., 39, 3–28.Google Scholar
Birstein, Ya. A., 1963. Deep-sea Isopodans in the North-western Part of the Pacific Ocean, pp. 3–213. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Birstein, Ya. A. and Sokolova, M. N., 1960. Bottom fauna of the Bougainville Trench. Trudy Inst. Okeanol., 41, 128–131.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, R. V., 1919. The Annelida Polychaeta. Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv., 48, 1–514.Google Scholar
Ekman, S., 1935. Tiergeographie des Meeres. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ekman, S., 1953. Zoogeography of the Sea, 417 pp. London.Google Scholar
Hartman, O., 1965. Deep-water benthic polychaetous annelids off New England to Bermuda and North Atlantic areas. Occ. Pap. Allan Hancock Fdn, 28, 378 pp.Google Scholar
Hartman, O., 1967. Polychaetous annelids collected by the U.S.N.S. Eltanin and Staten Island cruises, chiefly from Antarctic Seas. Allan Hancock Monogr. Mar. Bioi,2, 387 pp.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. and Fauchald, K., 1971. Deep-water benthic polychaetous annelids off New England to Bermuda and other North Atlantic areas. Part II. Allan Hancock Mongr. Mar. Biol., 6, 327 pp.Google Scholar
Kirkegaard, J. B., 1956. Benthic Polychaeta from depths exceeding 6000 meters. Galathea Rep., 2, 63–78.Google Scholar
Lavenstein, R. Ya., 1970 a. New and rare species of deep-sea genus Fauveliopsis (Polychaeta) and patterns of their distribution. Trudy Inst. Okeanol., 88, 227–235.Google Scholar
Lavenstein, R. Ya., 1970 b. Ecology and zoogeography of some Pacific Polychaeta of the family Opheliidae. Trudy Inst. Okeanol., 88, 213–226.Google Scholar
Lavenstein, R. Ya., 1971. Polychaeta of the genera Macellicephala and Macelliphaloides (fam. Aphroditidae) from the Pacific. Trudy Inst. Okeanol., 92, 18–35.Google Scholar
Madsen, F. J., 1961.On the zoogeography and origin of the abyssal fauna. Galathea Rep., 4, 177–218.Google Scholar
McIntosh, W. C, 1885. Report on the annelida polychaeta collected by H.M.S. ‘Challenger’ during the years 1873–1876. Rep. Scient. Res. Voy. H.M.S. Challenger, Zool, 12, 554 pp.Google Scholar
Mcintosh, W. C, 1922. Notes from the Marine Laboratory, St Andrews. On new and rare Polychaeta from various regions. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 9, 1–30.Google Scholar
Menzies, R. J., 1959. Priapulus abyssorum new species. The first abyssal priapulid. Nature, Lond., 184, 1585–1586.Google Scholar
Moore, J. P., 1910. The polychaetous annelids dredged by the ‘Albatross’ off the coast of Southern California in 1904. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad., 62, 328–402.Google Scholar
Murina, V. V., 1961. On the geographical distribution of the abyssal Phascolion lutense Selenka Okeanologiya, 1, 140–142.Google Scholar
Murina, V. V., 1964. New and rare species of Sipunculids of the genus Goldfingia. Trudy Inst. Okeanol., 69, 216–253.Google Scholar
Neyman, A. A., 1971. On the zonation of the ocean shelves and open seas according to their bottom fauna. In Basic Biological Productivity of the Ocean and its Use, 183–200. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Parin, N. V. and Pasternak, F. A., 1962. Zoological studies on the 33rd cruise of the R/V ‘Vityaz’. Zool. Zh., 41, 155–160.Google Scholar
Pasternak, F. A., 1961. New data on the specific composition and distribution of the deep-sea pennatularian genus Kophobelemnon in the northern part of the Pacific Ocean. Trudy Inst. Okeanol., 45, 240–258.Google Scholar
Pasternak, F. A., 1964. The deep-sea Pennatularians (Octocorallia) and Antipatharians (Hexacorallia) obtained by R/V ‘Vityaz’ in the Indian Ocean and the resemblance between the faunas of the Pennatularians of the Indian Ocean and the Pacific. Trudy Inst. Okeanol., 69, 183–215.Google Scholar
Pasternak, F. A., 1972. Deep-sea pennatularians (Octocorallia, Pennatularia) from the Aleutian Trench and the Gulf of Alaska. Trudy Inst. Okeanol. (in press).Google Scholar
Reyss, D., 1968. Presence en Miditerranee du Genre Macellicephala Polychaeta Aphroditidae. Vie Milieu, 19A, 323–328.Google Scholar
Sokolova, M. N., 1956. On the regularities in the distribution of the deep-sea benthos. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 110, 692–695.Google Scholar
Sokolova, M. N., 1964. On some regularities involved with the distribution of food groupings in the abyssal benthos. Okeanologiya, 6, 1079–1088.Google Scholar
Sokolova, M. N., 1965. On the irregularity in the distribution of nutrition groupings of deep sea benthos in connection with the irregularity of sedimentation. Okeanologiya, 3, 498–506.Google Scholar
Sokolova, M. N., 1969. The distribution of the deep-sea bottom invertebrates in dependence of their mode of feeding and feeding conditions. In The Pacific Ocean, 7, II, 182–201. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Sokolova, M. N., 1972. Trophic structure of the deep-sea macrobenthos. Mar. Biol. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolova, M. N. and Neyman, A. A., 1966. Trophic groups of bottom fauna and its distribution regularities in the ocean. In Ecology of marine organisms, 42–49. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Ushakov, P. V., 1955. Aphroditidae (Polychaetae) of the Kuril-Kamchatka Trench. Trudy Inst. Okeanol., 12, 311–321.Google Scholar
Ushakov, P. V., 1957. On Polychaeta fauna of the Arctic and Antarctica. Zool. Zh., 36, 1659–1672.Google Scholar
Vinogradova, N. G., 1969. The geographical distribution of the deep-sea bottom fauna. In The Pacific Ocean, 7, II, 154–181. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Zarenkov, N. A., 1965. Fauna and zoogeography of decapods of the Antarctic and Southern temperate regions. Cand. Thesis.Google Scholar
Zenkevitch, L. A., 1960. Special quantitative indication of deep water life in the oceans. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Geogr., 2, 10–16.Google Scholar