Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T07:44:11.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ecological aspects of birch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

C. H. Gimingham
C. H. Gimingham
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB9 2UD
Get access

Synopsis

The respective ecological amplitudes of the two British tree species of Betula are known only imperfectly. B. pendula is better represented on drier, lighter soils and is more of a southern, eastern and lowland species than B. pubescens, which belongs rather to the wetter, colder conditions of north, west and upland Britain. The contribution of the two species to different types of woodland community is briefly reviewed in this paper, and consideration is given to the status of ‘pure’ birchwoods. In some cases, the latter may have been derived from other woodland types; in others, by invasion of heath or grassland. However, some relict birchwoods above the altitudinal limits of dominance by other trees, and in the extreme north and west of Scotland, may be ‘natural’ or ‘climax’ woods.

Birches show a number of characteristics of ‘r-selected’ plants and hence tend to be trees of secondary or seral woodlands. Factors determining the capacity of birch species to colonize bare ground or vegetation such as heath and grassland, are reviewed, with special reference to a study of invasion of Calluna heath at Dinnet, Aberdeenshire. The importance of the development of gaps in the Calluna canopy, or alternatively of fire, in providing suitable sites for establishment, is emphasized.

Changes in the ground vegetation following the establishment of birch stands are outlined, as well as the subsequent development of seral birchwoods. Attention is drawn to the fact that many upland birchwoods are becoming moribund, and to the effects of grazing and other influences in preventing regeneration. The possibility of reversing this trend is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 85 , Issue 1-2: Birches , 1984 , pp. 65 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Currall, A. R. 1981. Distribution and succession of epiphytes on birch in north west Scotland. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Dickson, J. H. 1984. Pleistocene history of Betula with special reference to the British Isles. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 85B, 1–11.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. C. and Kenworthy, J. B. 1973. Distribution of two species of birch forming stands on Deeside, Aberdeenshire. Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinb. 42, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, A. S. 1984. The taxonomy of infraspecific variation in Betula pubescens Ehrh., with particular reference to the Scottish Highlands. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 85B, 13–26.Google Scholar
Khoon, Gong Wooi and Gimingham, C. H. 1984. Birch regeneration in heath vegetation. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 85B, 73–81.Google Scholar
Khoon, Gong Wooi. 1976. Birch regeneration in heathland vegetation. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Kinnaird, J. W. 1974. Effect of site conditions on the regeneration of birch (Betula pendula Roth and B. pubescens Ehrh.). J. Ecol. 62, 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McVean, D. N. 1964. Woodland and scrub. In The Vegetation of Scotland, ed. Burnett, J. H., pp. 144–167. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
McVean, D. N. and Ratcliffe, D. A. 1962. Plant communities of the Scottish Highlands. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Miller, Hugh G. 1984. Nutrient cycles in birchwoods. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 85B, 83–96.Google Scholar
Tansley, A. G. 1939. The British Islands and their Vegetation. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar