Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:36:20.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The contribution from conventional plant breeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

N. L. Innes
N. L. Innes
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland, U.K.
Get access

Synopsis

Accurate quantitative assessment of the benefits accruing from the genetic improvement of crops is difficult. Crop yield increases are achieved through the introduction of new, improved varieties, through improvements in cultural practices and as a consequence of interactions that occur between new varieties, cultural practices and environmental conditions. Part of the yield increases from new varieties is as a consequence of genetic plant resistance to pests and diseases. Plant breeding, which is dependent on there being available a wide relevant genetic base for each crop, has also provided considerable improvements in quality, as well as improving adaptability to a wider range of environments.

In the developed world estimated annual yield increases from the genetic improvement of crops, especially cereals, are of the order of 1–2%. Examples are given from a number of crops of hybrid varieties, of varieties with improved quality and of varieties that are genetically resistant to pests and diseases to illustrate that conventional plant breeding, allied to multi-disciplinary, strategic research, has been very effective, both economically and in protecting the environment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 99 , Issue 3-4: Opportunities and Problems in Plant Biotechnology , 1992 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, M. H., & Innes, N. L., 1976. Plant breeding. In Agricultural research for development. The Namulonge contribution, pp. 197–246, ed. Arnold, M. H. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. H., Innes, N. L., & Brown, S. J., 1976. Resistance breeding. In Agricultural research for development. The Namulonge contribution, pp. 175–95, ed. Arnold, M. H. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, R. B., Bingham, J., Blackwell, R. D., Evans, L. T., Ford, M. A., Morgan, C. L., & Taylor, M., 1980. Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 675–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, W. C., 1986. Partners Against Hunger. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Washington, World Bank. pp. 337.Google Scholar
Bingham, J., 1987. Prospects for wheat breeding in the United Kingdom. Cereals. Bulletin 6 of Scottish Society for Crop Research, Dundee, Scotland, pp. 6–13.Google Scholar
Black, W., 1971. Researches on potatoes at the Scottish Plant Breeding Station. 50th Annual Report 1970–1971 of Scottish Plant Breeding Station, pp. 52–60.Google Scholar
Borlaug, N. E., & Dowswell, C. R., 1988. World Revolution in Agriculture. In Encyclopaedia Britannica 1988 Book of the Year. Encyclopaedia Britannica International, pp. 5–14.Google Scholar
Bridge, R. R., & Meredith, W. R., 1983. Comparative performance of obsolete and current cotton cultivars. Crop Science 23, 949–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. H. D., Frankel, O. H., Marshall, D. R., & Williams, J. T., 1989. The use of plant genetic resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J., Mackay, G. R., Bain, H., Griffith, D. W., & Allison, M. J., 1990. The processing potential of tubers of the cultivated potato Solanum tuberosum L., after storage at low temperature. 2. Sugar concentration. Potato Research 33, 219–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, A. L., & McNeilly, T., 1975. Effects of increased humidity on pollen tube growth and seed set following self-pollination in Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea var gemmifera). Euphytica 24, 805–13.Google Scholar
Crisp, P., 1976. Trends in the breeding and cultivation of cruciferous crops. In The biology and chemistry of the Cruciferae, pp. 69–118, eds Vaughan, J. G., MacLeod, A. J., & Jones, B. M. G., London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dale, M. F. B., & Brown, J., 1989. The use of foliage assessment to improve the identification of tolerance to damage by nematodes (Globodera pallida) in potatoes. Annals of Applied Biology 115, 313–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, M. F., Phillips, M. S., Ayres, R. M., Hancock, M., Holliday, M., Mackay, G. R., & Tones, S. J., 1988. The assessment of the tolerance of partially resistant potato clones to damage by the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida at different sites and in different years. Annals of Applied Biology 113, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, D. G., 1986a. Development and spread of high-yielding wheat varieties in developing countries. Agency for International Development, Washington DC. pp. 99.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, D. G., 1986b. Development and spread of high-yielding rice varieties in developing countries. Agency for International Development, Washington DC. pp. 117.Google Scholar
Duvick, D. N., 1977. Genetic rates of gain in hybrid maize yields during the past 40 years. Maydica 22, 187–96.Google Scholar
Duvick, D. N., 1986. Plant Breeding: past achievements and expectations for the future. Economy Botany, 40(3), 289–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, K., & Haydock, P. P. J., 1990. A review of tolerance by potato plants of cyst nematode attack, with consideration of what factors may confer tolerance and methods of assaying and improving it in crops. Annals of Applied Biology 117, 703–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, K., & Russel, M. D., 1990. Field trials using single potato plants as whole plots, with and without nematicide treatment, to assess tolerance of attack by Globodera rostochiensis. Annals of Applied Biology 117, 595–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, G. J., 1978. Seed production of Fl hybrid Brussels sprouts. Acta Horticulturae 83, 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, G. J., 1983. Maintenance, testing and seed production of vegetable stocks. Vegetable Research Trust, Wellesbourne, Warwick, 64 pp.Google Scholar
Flor, H. H., 1956. The complementary genie systems in flax and flax rust. Advances in Genetics 8, 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, R., 1983. Heterosis. Reappraisal of theory and practice. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendinning, D. R., 1983. Potato introductions and breeding up to the early 20th Century. New Phytologist 94, 479–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gothard, P. G., Riggs, T. J., & Smith, D. B., 1983. The malting quality of some spring barley varieties grown in England and Wales between 1880 and 1980. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 89, 344–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harborne, J. B., & Hall, E., 1964. Plant Polyphenols. 13. The systematic distribution and origin of anthocyanins containing branched trisaccharides. Phytochemistry 3, 453–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, J. G., 1985. Plant genetic resources. The impact of the International Agricultural Research Centres. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, 115 pp.Google Scholar
Holden, J. H. W., 1977. Potato breeding at Pentlandfleld. 56th Annual Report 1976–1977 of Scottish Plant Breeding Station, pp. 66–97.Google Scholar
Innes, N. L., 1983a. Bacterial blight of cotton. Biological Reviews 58, 157–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, J. H. W., 1983b. Breeding field vegetables. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Centre, 10th Anniversary Monograph Series, Shanhua, Taiwan, Republic of China, 34 pp.Google Scholar
IRRI 1988. Hybrid rice. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Hybrid Rice. October 1986. Changsha, Hunan, China. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines, 304 pp.Google Scholar
Jinks, J. L., 1983. Biometrical genetics of heterosis. In Heterosis. Reappraisal of theory and practice, ed. Frankel, R., Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. G., 1964. F1 hybrid vegetables. World Crops 16, 56–61.Google Scholar
Kho, J. O., & Baer, J., 1968. Observing pollen tubes by means of fluorescence. Euphytica 17, 298–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kort, J., Ross, H., Rumpenhorst, J. H., & Stone, A. R., 1977. An international scheme for identifying and classifying pathotypes of potato cyst nematodes Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida. Nematologica 23, 333–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, G. R., Brown, J., & Torrance, C. J. W., 1990. The processing potential of tubers of the cultivated potato Solanum tuberosum L., after storage at low temperature. 1. Fry colour. Potato Research 33, 211–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakanishi, T., Esahi, Y., & Hinata, K., 1969. Control of self-incompatibility by CO2 gas in Brassica. Plant Cell Physiology 10, 925–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. R., 1973. Breeding plants for disease resistance. Concepts and applications. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Nijenhuis, B. Te 1971. Estimation of the proportion of inbred seed in Brussels sprouts hybrid seed by acid phosphatase isoenzyme analysis. Euphytica 20, 498–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ockendon, D. J., 1974. Distribution of self incompatibility alleles and breeding structure of open pollinated cultivars of Brussels sprouts. Heredity 33, 159–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijenhuis, D. J., 1975. Dominance relationships between S-alleles in the stigmas of Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea var gemmifera). Euphytica 24, 165–72.Google Scholar
Pearson, O. H., 1932. Breeding plants of the cabbage group. University of California Experimental Station Bulletin, 432, 22 pp.Google Scholar
Phillips, M. S., 1985. Environmental differences and their effect on the assessment of quantitative resistance to potato cyst nematodes. EEPO Bulletin 15, 179–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, M. S., & Dale, M. F. B., 1982. An investigation of resistance to the white potato cyst nematode. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, M. S., Forrest, J. M. S., & Hayter, A. M., 1979. Genotype x environment interaction for resistance to the white potato cyst nematode (Globodera pallida pathotype E) in Solanum vernei x S. tuberosum hybrids. Euphytica 28, 515–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, M. S., Forrest, J. M. S., & Farrer, L. A., 1980. Screening for resistance to potato cyst nematode using closed containers. Annals of Applied Biology 96, 317–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, M. S., Trudgill, D. L., & Evans, K., 1988. The use of single, spaced potato plants to assess their tolerance of damage by potato cyst nematodes. Potato Research 31, 469–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucknett, D. L., Smith, N. J. H., Williams, J. T., & Anishetty, N. M., 1987. Gene banks and the world's food, p. 247. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W., 1990. Plant genomes, gene markers and linkage maps. Conference on Biotechnology and crop improvement in Asia. ICRISAT, India, December 1990.Google Scholar
Riley, R., 1981. Plant breeding. In Agricultural research, pp. 115–37, ed. Cooke, G. W., London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Roberts, E. H., 1975. Problems of long-term storage of seed and pollen for genetic resources conservation. In Crop genetic resources for today and tomorrow, pp. 269–95, eds Frankel, O. H., & Hawkes, J. G., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruttan, V. W., 1986. Towards a global agricultural system: A personal view. Research Policy 15, 307–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvey, V., 1986. The contribution of new varieties to cereal yields in England and Wales between 1947 and 1983. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 17, 155–68.Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. W., 1981. Genotype (G), environment (E) and GE components of crop yields. Experimental Agriculture 17, 355–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, M. D., 1972. Polygenic resistance to plant disease and its use in breeding resistant cultivars. Journal of Environmental Quality 1, 232–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, G. F., 1977. Corn and corn improvement. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Stone, A. R., 1973. Heterodera pallida n. sp. (Nematoda: Heteroderidae), a second species of potato cyst nematode. Nematologica 18, 591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, A. R., 1975. Taxonomy of potato cyst nematodes. EPPO Bulletin 5, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaminathan, M. S., 1984. Agricultural production. Lancet December 8, 1329–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J., 1989. Colour stability of blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum) juice. Journal of Science, Food and Agriculture 49, 487–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, K. F., 1957. Self-incompatibility in marrow-stem kale, Brassica oleracea var acephela. 1. Demonstration of a sporophytic system. Journal of Genetics 55, 415–60.Google Scholar
Timothy, D. H., Harvey, P. H., & Dowswell, C. R., 1988. Development and spread of improved maize varieties and hybrids in developing countries. Agency for International Development, Washington DC. pp. 71.Google Scholar
Toxopeus, H. J., & Huijsman, C. A., 1953. Breeding for resistance to potato root eelworm. 1. Preliminary data concerning the inheritance and the nature of resistance. Euphytica 2, 180–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, D. L., 1985. Potato cyst nematodes: a critical review of the current pathotyping scheme. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 15, 273–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, D. L., 1986. Yield losses caused by potato cyst nematodes; a review of the current position in Britain and prospects for improvements. Annals of Applied Biology 108, 181–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, D. L., 1991. Resistance to and tolerance of plant parasitic nematodes in plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology 29, 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgil, D. L., & Cotes, L. M., 1983. Tolerance of potato to potato cyst nematodes (Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida) in relation to the growth and efficiency of the root system. Annals of Applied Biology 102, 385–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, D. L., Phillips, M. S., & Alphey, T. J. W., 1987. Integrated control of potato cyst nematode. Outlook in Agriculture 16, 167–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Plank, J. E., 1963. Plant diseases: Epidemics and control. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
van der Plank, J. E., 1982. Host-pathogen interactions in plant disease. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Visser, D. L., 1977. The effect of alternating temperatures on the self incompatibility of some clones of Brussels sprouts. Euphytica 26, 273–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, A. B., & Wiseman, E. M., 1980. Acid phosphatase isoenzymes of Brassica oleracea seedlings and their application to sib testing in F1 hybrids. Annals of Applied Biology 94, 137–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withers, L. A., 1989. In vitro conservation and germplasm utilisation. In The use of plant genetic resources, pp. 309–34, eds Brown, A. H. D., Frankel, O. H., Marshall, D. R., & Williams, J. T., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar