Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:39:50.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Positive solutions of semilinear elliptic problems with a Hardy potential

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2019

Catherine Bandle
Affiliation:
Departement Mathematik und Informatik, Universität Basel, Spiegelgasse 1, CH-4051Basel, Switzerland (catherine.bandle@unibas.ch)
Maria Assunta Pozio
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Matematica, Sapienza Università di Roma, P.le A. Moro 5, I-00185Roma, Italy

Abstract

Let Ω ⊂ ℝN be a bounded domain and δ(x) be the distance of a point x ∈ Ω to the boundary. We study the positive solutions of the problem Δu + (μ/(δ(x)2))u = up in Ω, where p > 0, p ≠ 1 and μ ∈ ℝ, μ ≠ 0 is smaller than the Hardy constant. The interplay between the singular potential and the nonlinearity leads to interesting structures of the solution sets. In this paper, we first give the complete picture of the radial solutions in balls. In particular, we establish for p > 1 the existence of a unique large solution behaving like δ−(2/(p−1)) at the boundary. In general domains, we extend the results of Bandle and Pozio and show that there exists a unique singular solutions u such that $u/\delta ^{\beta _-}\to c$ on the boundary for an arbitrary positive function $c \in C^{2+\gamma }(\partial \Omega ) \, (\gamma \in (0,1)), c \ges 0$. Here β is the smaller root of β(β − 1) + μ = 0.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Bandle, C. and Marcus, M.. Asymptotic behaviour of solutions and their derivatives, for semilinear elliptic problems with blowup on the boundary. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 12 (1995), 155171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Bandle, C. and Pozio, M. A.. Sublinear elliptic problems with a Hardy potential. Nonlinear Analysis 119 (2015), 149166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Bandle, C., Moroz, V. and Reichel, W.. ‘Boundary blowup’ type subsolutions to semilinear elliptic equations with Hardy potential. J. London Math. Soc. 77 (2008), 503523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Bandle, C., Moroz, V. and Reichel, W.. Large solutions to semilinear elliptic equations with Hardy potential and exponential nonlinearity. In Around the research of Vladimir Maz'ya II. Partial differential equations (ed. Laptev, A.), International Series, vol. 12, pp. 122 (New York/Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London: Springer, 2010).Google Scholar
5Bandle, C., Marcus, M. and Moroz, V.. Boundary singularities of solutions of semilinear ellipticequations with Hardy potential, boundary singularities of solutions of semilinear elliptic equations in the half-space with a Hardy potential. Israel J. Math. 222 (2017), 487514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Du, Y. and Wei, L.. Boundary behavior of positive solutions to nonlinear elliptic equations with Hardy potential. J. London Math. Soc. 91 (2015), 731749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Foote, R. L.. Regularity of distance function. Proc. AMS 92 (1984), 153155.Google Scholar
8Marcus, M. and Nguyen, P.-T.. Moderate solutions of semilinear elliptic equations with Hardy potential. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincare (C) Non Linear Anal. 34 (2014), 6988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Marcus, M., Mizel, V. J. and Pinchover, Y.. On the best constant for Hardy's inequality in ℝn. Trans. A.M.S. 350 (1998), 32373255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Miranda, C.. Partial differential equations of elliptic type. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, vol. 2 (Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer, 1970).Google Scholar