Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Geometric-progression-free sets over quadratic number fields

  • Andrew Best (a1), Karen Huan (a1), Nathan McNew (a2), Steven J. Miller (a3), Jasmine Powell (a4), Kimsy Tor (a5) and Madeleine Weinstein (a6)...

Extract

In Ramsey theory one wishes to know how large a collection of objects can be while avoiding a particular substructure. A problem of recent interest has been to study how large subsets of the natural numbers can be while avoiding three-term geometric progressions. Building on recent progress on this problem, we consider the analogous problem over quadratic number fields. We first construct high-density subsets of the algebraic integers of an imaginary quadratic number field that avoid three-term geometric progressions. When unique factorization fails, or over a real quadratic number field, we instead look at subsets of ideals of the ring of integers. Our approach here is to construct sets ‘greedily’, a generalization of the greedy set of rational integers considered by Rankin. We then describe the densities of these sets in terms of values of the Dedekind zeta function. Next, we consider geometric-progression-free sets with large upper density. We generalize an argument by Riddell to obtain upper bounds for the upper density of geometric-progression-free subsets, and construct sets avoiding geometric progressions with high upper density to obtain lower bounds for the supremum of the upper density of all such subsets. Both arguments depend critically on the elements with small norm in the ring of integers.

Copyright

References

Hide All

* Present address: Department of Mathematics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA ()

Present address: Department of Mathematics, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA ()

Present address: Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA ()

§ Present address: Department of Mathematics, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 75005, France ()

Keywords

MSC classification

Geometric-progression-free sets over quadratic number fields

  • Andrew Best (a1), Karen Huan (a1), Nathan McNew (a2), Steven J. Miller (a3), Jasmine Powell (a4), Kimsy Tor (a5) and Madeleine Weinstein (a6)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed