Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:43:15.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Interpretation and Dating of Humanly Worked Siliceous Materials by Thermoluminescent Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Ralph M. Rowlett
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65201; Department of Anthropology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50010; Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66044
Margaret D. Mandeville
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65201; Department of Anthropology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50010; Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66044
Edward J. Zeller
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65201; Department of Anthropology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50010; Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66044

Abstract

Thermoluminescence analysis can reveal when archaeological lithics especially siliceous stones such as flint, chert and the like have been subjected to heat treatment prior to chipping. This determination can serve as the first step in the dating of these stones, as well as stones exposed otherwise to heating, utilizing the same principles as for the thermoluminescent dating of pottery. The oldest known example of heat treatment verified by this method comes from the Solutrian industry of south-western France (ca. 15000 bc).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitken, M. J., 1970. ‘Thermoluminescence Dating of Ancient Pottery’, Scientific Methods in Medieval Archaeology, Berger, Rainer (ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press, 271–9.Google Scholar
Bordes, F., 1969. ‘Traitement Thermique du Silex au Solutreen’, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, 66, 197.Google Scholar
Crabtree, Don E. and Butler, B. Robert, 1964. ‘Notes on Experiments in Flintknapping: 1. Heat Treatment of Silica Minerals’, Tebiwa, 7, 16.Google Scholar
Daniels, F., Boyd, C. and Saunders, D., 1953. ‘Thermoluminescence as a Research Tool’, Science, 117, 343–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gosku, H. Y. and Fremlin, J. H., 1972. ‘Thermoluminescence from Unirradiated Flints: Regeneration Thermoluminescence’, Archaeometry, 14, 127–32.Google Scholar
Kretzoi, M. and Vertes, L., 1965. ‘Upper Biharian (Intermindel) Pebble-industry occupation site in Western Hungary’, Current Anthropology, 6, 7495.Google Scholar
Mandeville, M. D., 1973. The Baked and the Half-Baked: A Consideration of the Thermal Pre-Treatment of Chert. Plains Anthropologist, 18, 177202.Google Scholar
Mejdahl, V., 1970. ‘Measurement of Environmental Radiation at Archaeological Sites’, Archaeometry, 12, 147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M. N. A. and von der Borch, C. C., 1965. ‘Modern Inorganic Deposition in a Carbonate-Precipitating Locality’, Science, 149, 1501–3.Google Scholar
Purdy, B. A. and Brooks, H. K., 1971. ‘Thermal Alteration of Silica Minerals: an Archaeological Approach: Science, 173, 322–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar