Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:29:23.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diatom Analysis of Clays and Late Neolithic Pottery from the Milfield Basin, Northumberland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

A. M. Gibson
A. M. Gibson*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The suitability of diatom analysis for provenancing British late neolithic and early Bronze Age ceramics is examined. The Milfield Basin, Northumberland, was chosen for a test programme, as an area with well documented clay sources, defined geology and available pottery samples. The bulk of the pottery sampled was of local origin, or at least need not have been made elsewhere; one sherd, the only possible Beaker sherd sampled, seems to be an import. It is concluded that it is possible to use diatoms in this way, and some of the problems of the technique are discussed, together with possible solutions. Sampling and counting strategies are also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , 1986 , pp. 89 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Burgess, C. B., 1980. ‘Excavations at Houseledge, Black Law, orthumberland, 1979, and their implications for earlier Bronze Age settlement in the Cheviots’, Northern Archaeol. 1(i), 5–13.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. M., 1978. Bronze Age Pottery in the North-East of England. Brit. Archaeol. Rep. 56, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. M., 1981. ‘Experimental bonfire firings on Black Law’, Northern Archaeol. 2 (2), 15–32.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. M., 1982. Beaker domestic sites: a study in the domestic pottery of the late third and early second millennia BC in the British Isles. Brit. Archaeol. Rep. 107, Oxford.Google Scholar
Greenwell, W. and Rolleston, G., 1877. British Barrows. Oxford.Google Scholar
Guillard, R. R. L. and Kilham, P., 1977. ‘Ecology of marine planktonic diatoms’, in Werner, D. (ed.) 1977, 372–469.Google Scholar
Harding, A. F., 1981. ‘Excavations in the prehistoric ritual complex near Milfield, Northumberland’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 47, 87–136.Google Scholar
Hustedt, F., 1930. ‘Bacillariophyta (Diatomaceae)’, in Pascher, A. (ed.), Die Süsswasserflora Mitteleuropas, Heft 10. 2nd edition, Jena.Google Scholar
Jansma, M. J., 1977. ‘Diatom analysis of pottery’, in van Beek, B. L., Brandt, R. W. and Waateringe, W. Groenman-van (eds), Ex Horreo, 77–85. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Jansma, M. J., 1981a. ‘Diatom analysis from coastal sites in the Netherlands’, in Brothwell, D. and Dimbleby, G. (eds), Environmental Aspects of Coasts and Islands, 145–62. Brit. Archaeol. Rep. S94, Oxford.Google Scholar
Jansma, M. J., 1981b. ‘Diatomeeenanalyse van een aantal aardwerkscherven uit enkele kuilen op de Hooidonksche Akkers, gem. Son En Breugel, prov. Noord-Brabant’, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 13, 93–96.Google Scholar
Jansma, M. J., 1982. ‘Diatom analysis from some prehistoric sites in the coastal area of the Netherlands’, Acta Geologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 25, 229–36.Google Scholar
Miket, R. F., 1976. ‘Evidence for Neolithic Activity in the Milfield Basin, Northumberland’, in Burgess, C. B. and Miket, R. F. (eds), Settlement and Economy in the Late Third and Second Millennia BC, 113–42. Brit. Archaeol. Rep. 33, Oxford.Google Scholar
Miket, R. F., 1981. ‘Pit alignments in the Milfield basin, and the excavation of Ewart I’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 47, 137–46.Google Scholar
Mills, F. W., 1933–1935. An index to the genera and species of the diatomaceae and their synonyms 1816–1932. London.Google Scholar
Patrick, R., 1977. ‘Ecology of fresh water diatoms — diatom communities’, in Werner, D. (ed.) 1977, 284–332.Google Scholar
Patrick, R. and Reimer, C. W., 1966. The diatoms of the United States. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Monograph 13.Google Scholar
Payton, R. W. 1980. ‘The soils of the Milfield plain, Northumberland’, North of England Soils Discussion Group Proceedings, 161–52.Google Scholar
Shackley, M. L., 1981. Environmental Archaeology. London.Google Scholar
Tait, J., 1965. Beakers from Northumberland. Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Voorhips, A. and Jansma, M. J., 1974. ‘Pollen and diatom analysis of a shore section of the former lake Wevershoof’, Geologie en Mijnbouw 53, 429–35.Google Scholar
van der Werff, A. and Huls, H., 1957. Diatomeeenflora van Nederland. Abcause, 1957–74.Google Scholar
Werner, D., 1977. ‘Introduction’, in Werner, D. (ed.) 1977, 1–17.Google Scholar
Werner, D. (ed.), 1977. The Biology of Diatoms. Botanical Monograph 13, Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
de Wolf, H., 1982. ‘Method of coding of ecological data from diatoms for computer utilisation’, Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst 36 (2), 95–98, plus list of coded species.Google Scholar