Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T17:24:01.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Archæological Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2013

J. Reid Moir
Get access

Extract

The object of this paper is to draw attention to certain archæological problems which, at the present time, have an important bearing upon the study of prehistoric man in England.

Most archæologists are familiar with the pieces of tabular flint exhibiting human flaking, of a rough and primitive kind, along one or other of their edges, which Benjamin Harrison found, many years ago, in and upon the highest portions of the plateau of Kent. It is my purpose in this note, to discuss the geological, and cultural age of these specimens, and to endeavour to show that they represent the most ancient as well as the most primitive flint implements yet discovered.

Though there is very good reason to suppose that the eoliths of the Kent Plateau (the term “eolith” should be confined solely to these specimens, and to those of the same type found elsewhere), as is the case with others found in similar situations in different parts of the country, are of a great antiquity, it is nevertheless clear that, having not yet been discovered at these places, under any geologically datable deposit, the exact measure of that antiquity remains unknown.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , 1924 , pp. 234 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1SirPrestwich, J., Q.J.G.S., for May, 1889, and for May, 1891.Google Scholar
2Moir, J. Reid, “Nature”, March 29th, 1924.Google Scholar
3Moir, J. Reid. “Pre-palæolithic Man” (W. E. Harrison, Publisher, Ipswich).Google Scholar
4Kendall, ; H. G. O., Proc. P.S.E.A. Vol. III., Part III., p. 333–352.Google Scholar
5SirLankester, Ray. Phil. Trans., May, 1912.Google Scholar
6Moir, J. Reid. “The Great Flint Implements of Cromer, Norfolk.” (W. E. Harrison, Publisher, Ipswich).Google Scholar
7Schoetensack, Otto. “Der Unterkiefer des Homo heidelbergensis aus den Sanden von Mauer bei Heildelberg,” p. 19. Leipsiz. Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, 1908.Google Scholar
8Moir, J. Reid. Antiquaries' Journal. Vol. III, April, 1923, No. 2, pp. 135–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Commont. Les Hommes contemporains du Renne.Google Scholar
10Moir, J. Reid. Journ. Roy. Anthr. Inst. Vol. L., 1920, January to June, pp. 135–152.Google Scholar
11Moir, J. Reid. Journ. Roy. Anthr. Inst. Vol. XLVII., 1917, pp. 367–412Google Scholar
12Bull Soc. prehist. de France. 1907–1908. (Two papers).Google Scholar