Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Reducing waste in nutritional epidemiology: review and perspectives

  • Dana Hawwash (a1), Chen Yang (a1) and Carl Lachat (a1)

Abstract

We discuss efforts in improving the value of nutrition research. We organised the paper in five research stages: Stage 1: research priority setting; Stage 2: research design, conduct and analysis; Stage 3: research regulation and management; Stage 4: research accessibility and Stage 5: research reporting and publishing. Along the stages of the research cycle, varied initiatives exist to improve the quality and added value of nutrition research. However, efforts are focused on single stages of the research cycle without vision of the research system as a whole. Although research on nutrition research has been limited, it has potential to improve the quality of nutrition research and develop new tools and instruments for this purpose. A comprehensive assessment of the magnitude of research waste in nutrition and consensus on priority actions is needed. The nutrition research community at large needs to have open discussions on the usefulness of these tools and lead suitable efforts to enhance nutrition research across the stages of the research cycle. Capacity building is essential and considerations of nutrition research quality are vital to be integrated in training efforts of nutrition researchers.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: Carl Lachat, email Carl.lachat@ugent.be

References

Hide All
1.Baker, P, Hawkes, C, Wingrove, K et al. (2018) What drives political commitment for nutrition? A review and framework synthesis to inform the United Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition. BMJ Glob Health 3, e000485.
2.Mozaffarian, D, Rosenberg, I & Uauy, R (2018) History of modern nutrition science-implications for current research, dietary guidelines, and food policy. BMJ 361, k2392.
3.Satija, A, Yu, E & Willett, WC (2015) Understanding nutritional epidemiology and its role in policy. Adv Nutr 6, 518.
4.Ioannidis, JP (2013) Implausible results in human nutrition research. BMJ 347, f6698.
5.Archer, E, Pavela, G & Lavie, CJ (2015) The inadmissibility of what we eat in America and NHANES dietary data in nutrition and obesity research and the scientific formulation of national dietary guidelines. Mayo Clin Proc 90, 911926.
6.Ioannidis, JPA (2018) The challenge of reforming nutritional epidemiologic research. JAMA 320, 969970.
7.Nestle, M (2016) Food industry funding of nutrition research the relevance of history for current debates. JAMA Intern Med 176, 16851686.
8.Penders, B, Wolters, A, Feskens, EF et al. (2017) Capable and credible? Challenging nutrition science. Eur J Nutr 56, 20092012.
9.Chalmers, I, Bracken, MB, Djulbegovic, B et al. (2014) How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet 383, 156165.
10.Al-Shahi, Salman, R, Beller, E, Kagan, J et al. (2014) Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management. Lancet 383, 176185.
11.Chan, AW, Song, F, Vickers, A et al. (2014) Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research. Lancet 383, 257266.
12.Ioannidis, JP, Greenland, S, Hlatky, MA et al. (2014) Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet 383, 166175.
13.Glasziou, P, Altman, DG, Bossuyt, P et al. (2014) Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet 383, 267276.
14.Chalmers, I & Glasziou, P (2009) Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Obstet Gynecol 114, 13411345.
15.Aryeetey, R, Holdsworth, M, Taljaard, C et al. (2017) Evidence-informed decision making for nutrition: African experiences and way forward. Proc Nutr Soc 76, 589596.
16.Cochrane Nutrition. Cochrane Nutrition 2018 https://nutrition.cochrane.org (Accessed January 2019).
17.Schwingshackl, L, Knuppel, S, Schwedhelm, C et al. (2016) Perspective: nutrigrade: a scoring system to assess and judge the meta-evidence of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in nutrition research. Adv Nutr 7, 9941004.
18.Hawwash, D, Pinxten, W, Aubert Bonn, N et al. (2018) Perspective: consideration of values when setting priorities in nutrition research: guidance for transparency. Adv Nutr 9, 671687.
19.Rumsey, E (2016) Diet, Food, and Nutrition – How To Search in PubMed. Need to know. https://blog.lib.uiowa.edu/needtoknow/2016/03/18/food-diet-nutrition-how-to-search-in-pubmed/ (Accessed January 2019).
20.DIET@NET (DIETary Assessment Tools NETwork). Nutritools 2018. https://www.nutritools.org (Accessed January 2019).
21.World Health Organization. e-Library of Evidence for Nutrition Actions (eLENA) 2018. https://www.who.int/elena/en/ (Accessed January 2019).
22.World Health Organization. Global database on the Implementation of Nutrition Action (GINA) 2018. https://gdeploy.adappt.co.in/nutrition/gina/en (Accessed January 2019).
23.The World Cancer Research Fund International. The NOURISHING framework 2018 https://www.wcrf.org/int/policy/nourishing/our-policy-framework-promote-healthy-diets-reduce-obesity-large (Accessed January 2019).
24.World Health Organization. Draft Approach for the Prevention and Management of Conflicts of Interest in the Policy Development and Implementation of Nutrition Programmes at Country Level Decision-Making Process and Tool 2017. http://www.who.int/nutrition/consultation-doi/nutrition-tool.pdf (Accessed January 2019).
25.FAO, WHO. FAO/WHO GIFT Global Individual Food consumption data Tool. http://www.fao.org/gift-individual-food-consumption/en/ (Accessed January 2019).
26.Yang, C, Pinart, M, Kolsteren, P et al. (2017) Perspective: essential study quality descriptors for data from nutritional epidemiologic research. Adv Nutr 8, 639651.
27.Vitali, F, Lombardo, R, Rivero, D et al. (2018) ONS: an ontology for a standardized description of interventions and observational studies in nutrition. Genes Nutr 13, 12.
28.BioPortal. Ontology for Nutritional Epidemiology 2018. https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/ONE (Accessed January 2019).
29.Lachat, C, Hawwash, D, Ocke, MC et al. (2016) Strengthening the Reporting Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): an extension of the STROBE statement. PLoS Med 13, e1002036.
30.STROBE-nut. STROBE-nut: An extension of the STROBE statement for nutritional epidemiology 2016. http://www.strobe-nut.org (Accessed January 2019).
31.Morris, SS, Cogill, B, Uauy, R et al. (2008) Maternal and child undernutrition 5 – effective international action against undernutrition: why has it proven so difficult and what can be done to accelerate progress? Lancet 371, 608621.
32.Rudan, I, Gibson, JL, Ameratunga, S et al. (2008) Setting priorities in global child health research investments: guidelines for implementation of CHNRI method. Croat Med J 49, 720733.
33.Haddad, L, Hawkes, C, Webb, P et al. (2016) A new global research agenda for food. Nature 540, 3032.
34.Serodio, PM, McKee, M & Stuckler, D (2018) Coca-Cola – a model of transparency in research partnerships? A network analysis of Coca-Cola's research funding (2008–2016). Public Health Nutr 21, 15941607.
35.Fabbri, A, Chartres, N, Scrinis, G et al. (2017) Study sponsorship and the nutrition research agenda: analysis of randomized controlled trials included in systematic reviews of nutrition interventions to address obesity. Public Health Nutr 20, 13061313.
36.Lachat, C, Nago, E, Roberfroid, D et al. (2014) Developing a sustainable nutrition research agenda in sub-Saharan Africa--findings from the SUNRAY project. PLoS Med 11, e1001593.
37.Van Royen, K, Lachat, C, Holdsworth, M et al. (2013) How can the operating environment for nutrition research be improved in sub-Saharan Africa? The views of African researchers. PLoS ONE 8, e66355.
38.COHRED. The Research Fairness Initiative 2016. http://rfi.cohred.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Introduction-to-COHREDs-RFI_20160511.pdf (Accessed January 2019).
39.Balk, EM, Horsley, TA, Newberry, SJ et al. (2007) A collaborative effort to apply the evidence-based review process to the field of nutrition: challenges, benefits, and lessons learned. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 14481456.
40.Lawrence, M, Naude, C, Armstrong, R et al. (2016) A call to action to reshape evidence synthesis and use for nutrition policy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 21, 11.
41.Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Vist, GE et al. (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336, 924926.
42.Cade, JE, Warthon-Medina, M, Albar, S et al. (2017) DIET@NET: best practice guidelines for dietary assessment in health research. BMC Med 15, 202.
43.Pijls, L, Ashwell, M & Lambert, J (2009) EURRECA – A network of excellence to align European micronutrient recommendations. Food Chem 113, 748753.
44.Almiron-Roig, E, Aitken, A, Galloway, C et al. (2017) Dietary assessment in minority ethnic groups: a systematic review of instruments for portion-size estimation in the United Kingdom. Nutr Rev 75, 188213.
45.Serra-Majem, L, Andersen, LF, Henrique-Sanchez, P et al. (2009) Evaluating the quality of dietary intake validation studies. Brit J Nutr 102, S3S9.
46.Chiu, K, Grundy, Q & Bero, L (2017) ‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: a methodological systematic review. PLoS Biol 15, 9.
47.Kirkpatrick, SI, Collins, CE, Keogh, RH et al. (2018) Assessing dietary outcomes in intervention studies: pitfalls, strategies, and research needs. Nutrients 10, 8.
48.Williamson, PR, Altman, DG, Bagley, H et al. (2017) The COMET handbook: version 1.0. Trials 18, Suppl. 3, 280.
49.Rucker, RB & Rucker, MR (2016) Nutrition: ethical issues and challenges. Nutr Res 36, 11831192.
50.Weaver, CM & Miller, JW (2017) Challenges in conducting clinical nutrition research. Nutr Rev 75, 491499.
51.Tseng, M, Barnoya, J, Kruger, S et al. (2018) Disclosures of Coca-Cola funding: transparent or opaque? Public Health Nutr 21, 15911593.
52.Schwab, T (2018) Dietary disclosures: how important are non-financial interests? BMJ 361, k1451.
53.Bero, L & Grundy, Q (2018) Conflicts of interest in nutrition research. JAMA 320, 9394.
54.Enpadasi. Joint Programming Initiative – A Healthy Diet for A Healthy Life European Nutrition Phenotype Assessment and Data Sharing Initiative 2018. http://www.enpadasi.eu/deliverables_final_pdf/D51..pdf (Accessed January 2019).
55.U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov.https://clinicaltrials.gov (Accessed January 2019).
56.World Health Organization. International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). http://www.who.int/ictrp/en/ (Accessed January 2019).
57.University of York. PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews 2018. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (Accessed January 2019).
58.Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2018. http://www.healthdata.org/gbd (Accessed January 2019).
59.NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) 2018. http://ncdrisc.org (Accessed January 2019).
60.Global Nutrition and Policy Consortium. The Global Dietary Database 2018. https://www.globaldietarydatabase.org/the-global-dietary-database-measuring-diet-worldwide.html (Accessed January 2019).
61.European Commission. National Information Platforms for Nutrition. http://www.nipn-nutrition-platforms.org (Accessed January 2019).
62.ENPADASI. Phenotype database. https://dashin.eu/interventionstudies/ (Accessed January 2019).
63.Gaye, A, Marcon, Y, Isaeva, J et al. (2014) DataSHIELD: taking the analysis to the data, not the data to the analysis. Int J Epidemiol 43, 19291944.
64.EFSA (2015) The food classification and description system FoodEx2 (revision 2). EFSA Supporting Publications 12(5).
65.Pinart, M, Nimptsch, K, Bouwman, J et al. (2018) Joint data analysis in nutritional epidemiology: identification of observational studies and minimal requirements. J Nutr 148, 285297.
66.Noy, NF & McGuinness, DL (2001) Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880.
67.Ashburner, M, Ball, CA, Blake, JA et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25, 2529.
68.Moher, D, Glasziou, P, Chalmers, I et al. (2016) Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening? Lancet 387, 15731586.
69.Schulz, KF, Altman, DG, Moher, D et al. (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 63, 834840.
70.Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6, e1000097.
71.von Elm, E, Altman, DG, Egger, M et al. (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 4, e296.
72.Equator Network. Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research 2018. http://www.equator-network.org (Accessed January 2019).
73.Bekkering, GE, Harris, RJ, Thomas, S et al. (2008) How much of the data published in observational studies of the association between diet and prostate or bladder cancer is usable for meta-analysis? Am J Epidemiol 167, 10171026.
74.Burrows, T, Golley, RK, Khambalia, A et al. (2012) The quality of dietary intake methodology and reporting in child and adolescent obesity intervention trials: a systematic review. Obes Rev 13, 11251138.
75.Gibson, C, Kirk, E, Lecheminant, J et al. (2004) Reporting quality of randomized trials in the diet and exercise literature. Obes Res 12, A66A6A.
76.Faber, M, Wenhold, FA, Macintyre, UE et al. (2013) Presentation and interpretation of food intake data: factors affecting comparability across studies. Nutrition 29, 12861292.
77.Nelson, M & Margetts, B (1997) Design concepts in nutritional epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
78.Welch, RW, Antoine, JM, Bertam, JL et al. (2011) Guidelines for the design, conduct and reporting of human intervention studies to evaluate the health benefits of foods. Br J Nutr 106, Suppl. 2, S3S15.
79.Hornell, A, Berg, C, Forsum, E et al. (2017) Perspective: an extension of the STROBE Statement for Observational Studies in Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): explanation and elaboration. Adv Nutr 8, 652678.
80.Jago, R & Wood, L (2016) IJBNPA in 2016: Strategy for advancing the science of behavior change in nutrition and physical activity, and associated editorial priorities. Int J Behav Nutr Phys 13, 80.
81.Cainzos-Achirica, M, Bilal, U, Al Rifai, M et al. (2018) Communication issues in nutritional observational research. Prev Med 115, 7682.
82.Brown, AW, Ioannidis, JPA, Cope, MB et al. (2014) Unscientific beliefs about scientific topics in nutrition. Adv Nutr 5, 563565.
83.Ioannidis, JPA (2018) Meta-research: Why research on research matters. PLoS Biol 16, e2005468.
84.Hughes, R, Shrimpton, R, Recine, E et al. (2011) A competency framework for global public health nutrition workforce development: A background paper. World Public Health Nutrition Association. Available at http://www.wphna.org/htdocs/downloadsapr2012/12-03%20WPHNA%20Draft%20competency%20standards%20report.pdf
85.International Food Policy Research Institute (2014) Global Nutrition Report 2014: Actions and Accountability to Accelerate the World's Progress on Nutrition. Washington, DC.
86.Fanzo, JC, Graziose, MM, Kraemer, K et al. (2015) Educating and training a workforce for nutrition in a post-2015 world. Adv Nutr 6, 639647.
87.African leaders and stakeholders renew their call for action to end hunger by 2025 (2018). https://au.int/en/pressreleases/20180129/african-leaders-and-stakeholders-renew-their-call-action-end-hunger-2025 (Accessed January 2019).
88.Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) Movement (2018) Annual Progress Report. Geneva.
89.Editors Plos Med (2015) From checklists to tools: lowering the barrier to better research reporting. PLoS Med 12, 4.
90.Cochrance Linked data. Cochrane PICO Ontology. https://linkeddata.cochrane.org/pico-ontology; https://linkeddata.cochrane.org/about-site/test (Accessed January 2019).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
  • ISSN: 0029-6651
  • EISSN: 1475-2719
  • URL: /core/journals/proceedings-of-the-nutrition-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed