Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T10:06:16.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Pilot Study to assess the Impact of structured Diet and Exercise Counselling on Obesity and Quality of Life Measures in South Carolina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2014

H. Cooney
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham, United Kingdom B15 2TT
N. Madhusudan
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham, United Kingdom B15 2TT
N. S. Murali
Affiliation:
Gastroenterology Associates of South Carolina, Orangeburg, America
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

Obesity is a pervasive problem in America, especially in South Carolina, with 33.9% of the population overweight and 32.6% obese( 1 ). Obesity is associated with a poor quality of life (QOL), as shown by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF questionnaires)( Reference Wee, Davis and Hamel 2 ).

This study aimed to assess whether structured counselling on healthy diet and exercise choices in patients with a body mass index (BMI) over 25 kg/m2 had an impact on their QOL, understanding the benefits of healthy diet and exercise choices (DAEC) and BMI.

In this prospective pilot study, 104 patients were recruited at a gastroenterology centre in South Carolina. At the initial consultation, their QOL and knowledge of DAEC were assessed using the SF-12, and a structured ‘diet and exercise’ questionnaire (DAEQ). Their BMI was recorded, and categorized according to the World Health Organisation International Classification of Weight According to BMI (Overweight, Obese class I, II or III)( 3 ). They were counselled for 40 minutes on portion sizes, healthy meal choices and the importance of regular exercise. Their comprehension was verified by information recall. Written guidelines were supplied, reinforcing this information. These directives were based on guidance from the Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion( 4 ). The follow-up period was two months, in which patients received two phone calls to monitor their progress, SF-12 and DAEQ scores, and BMI.

The results before and after structured counselling are summarized in the table below. The Student's T-Test was used to calculate p values (* for p ⩽ 0.05 and ** for p ⩽ 0.01).

This study highlights the benefits of regular counselling, as an intervention for obesity management. With further follow-up, there is potential for greater improvement in results. There is an opportunity for physicians to motivate patients to take responsibility for their own physical and mental health, and prevent future co-morbidities through regular counseling.

References

1. US Census Bureau. Statistical Abstract of the United States 2012. Section 3 Health and Nutrition. Available from: https://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/12statab/health.pdf. Last accessed August 2013.Google Scholar
2. Wee, CC, Davis, RB, Hamel, MB (2008) Comparing the SF-12 and SF-36 health status questionnaires in patients with and without obesity. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6, 11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. World Health Organisation. BMI classification. Available from: http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html Google Scholar
4. Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. Improving the nutrition and well-being of Americans. Available from: http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/. Last accessed August 2013.Google Scholar