Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:12:52.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Persistence and development of malnutrition in patients with upper-gastrointestinal cancer: a longitudinal cohort study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2015

E. M. Grace
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, King's College London, SE1 9NH
K. Mohammed
Affiliation:
GI Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ
C. Shaw
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ
H. J. N. Andreyev
Affiliation:
GI Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ
K. Whelan
Affiliation:
Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division, King's College London, SE1 9NH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 

In patients with cancer, malnutrition is association with increased toxicity to oncological treatmentsReference van Cutsem and Arends 1 , poorer quality of lifeReference Lis, Gupta and Lammersfeld 2 and lower overall survivalReference Clavier, Antoni and Atlani 3 . Patients with upper-gastrointestinal (GI) cancer may be at particular risk of malnutrition in view of the tumour location. However, most studies are cross-sectional in design and measure the prevalence of malnutrition at the acute presentation of cancer. This study aimed to measure the prevalence of malnutrition in upper-GI cancer and to determine whether it persists or develops between diagnosis and the acute (3-month) and chronic (12-month) period of radical treatment.

Patients with newly diagnosed upper-GI cancer were recruited to a longitudinal cohort study and reviewed at the time of diagnosis and at 3-months and 12-months following the start of radical treatment. Nutritional assessment was performed using the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), which is considered a ‘gold-standard’ for nutritional assessment and has been validated in the oncology setting4. Using this tool, two results were obtained: (a) total score (score ⩾4 intervention needed; score ⩾9 critical intervention needed); and (b) subjective global rating (SGA A = well nourished, B = moderately malnourished and C = severely malnourished).

In total, 80 patients (61 males, 19 females) with a median age of 66 years (range 46–89) were recruited, with oesophageal (61%), gastric (33%) and gastro-oesophageal junction (6%) tumours. Of these, 68 were reviewed at 3-months and 57 at 12-months. Mean (SD) body weight was 76·6 kg (17·2) at baseline, 74·4 kg (14·8) at 3-months and 71·6 kg (16·7) at 12-months. In those with data at both time points, the reduction in body weight between baseline and 3-months (−2·3 kg, p = 0·003) and between 3-months and 12-months (−4·0 kg, p < 0·001) were statistically significant. Body mass index also decreased between baseline 26·7 kg/m2 (4·7), 3-months 25·9 kg/m2 (4·1) and 12-months 25 kg/m2 (4·9) (p = 0·006 for baseline to 3-months and p < 0·001 for 3- to 12-months).

The median (range) PG-SGA total score was 9 (0–28), 6 (2–26) and 7 (0–19) at baseline, 3- and 12 months, indicating that ‘intervention was required’. In addition, 61%, 62% and 60% of patients respectively were considered moderately/severely malnourished (SGA B or C) at the three time points. Reduced food intake contributed to malnutrition in 61% at baseline, 48% at 3-months and 52% at 12-months. In those with data at 12-months (n = 57), trends in the SGA category showed that 19 (33%) patients were moderately/severely malnourished at both baseline and 12-months (malnutrition ‘persisted’), while 15 (27%) were well-nourished to start but became moderately/severely malnourished by 12 months (malnutrition ‘developed’).

Patients with upper-GI cancer experience a progressive weight loss over time, with malnutrition either persisting or developing during the first year in the majority (60%). Optimising nutritional status throughout the treatment pathway should be considered a priority in this high-risk group, and studies that investigate the effectiveness of this on the success of oncological treatments, survival and quality of life are required.

References

1. van Cutsem, E & Arends, J (2005) Eur J Oncol Nurs 9, Suppl. 2, S5163.Google Scholar
2. Lis, CG, Gupta, D, Lammersfeld, CA et al. (2012) Nutr J 11, doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-27 Google Scholar
3. Clavier, J-B, Antoni, D, Atlani, D et al. (2014) Dis Esophagus 27, pp 560567.Google Scholar
4. Ottery, FD (2000) In The clinical guide to oncology nutrition. Chicago: American Dietetic Association, pp 1123.Google Scholar