Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

How can we improve the environmental sustainability of poultry production?

  • Ilkka Leinonen (a1) and Ilias Kyriazakis (a1)

Abstract

The review presents results of recent life cycle assessment studies aiming to quantify and improve the environmental performance of UK poultry production systems, including broiler meat, egg and turkey meat production. Although poultry production has been found to be relatively environmentally friendly compared with the production of other livestock commodities, it still contributes to environmental impacts, such as global warming, eutrophication and acidification. Amongst different sub-processes, feed production and transport contributes about 70 % to the global warming potential of poultry systems, whereas manure management contributes about 40–60 % to their eutrophication potential and acidification potential, respectively. All these impacts can be reduced by improving the feed efficiency, either by changing the birds through genetic selection or by making the feed more digestible (e.g. by using additives such as enzymes). However, although genetic selection has the potential to reduce the resources needed for broiler production (including feed consumption), the changing need of certain feed ingredients, most notably protein sources as a result of changes in bird requirements may limit the benefits of this strategy. The use of alternative feed ingredients, such as locally grown protein crops and agricultural by-products, as a replacement of South American grown soya, can potentially also lead to improvements in several environmental impact categories, as long as such feeding strategies have no negative effect on bird performance. Other management options, such as improving poultry housing and new strategies for manure management have also the potential to further improve the environmental sustainability of the poultry industries in Europe.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      How can we improve the environmental sustainability of poultry production?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      How can we improve the environmental sustainability of poultry production?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      How can we improve the environmental sustainability of poultry production?
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

* Corresponding author: I. Leinonen, email ilkka.leinonen@newcastle.ac.uk

References

Hide All
1. Steinfeld, H, Gerber, P, Wassenaar, T et al. (2006) Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. Rome, Italy: FAO.
2. Eriksson, IS, Elmquist, H, Stern, S et al. (2005) Environmental systems analysis of pig production - The impact of feed choice. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10, 143154.
3. van der Werf, HMG, Petit, J & Sanders, J (2005) The environmental impacts of the production of concentrated feed: the case of pig feed in Bretagne. Agric Syst 83, 153177.
4. Pelletier, N (2008) Environmental performance in the US broiler poultry sector: life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas, ozone depleting, acidifying and eutrophying emissions. Agric Syst 98, 6773.
5. Williams, AG, Audsley, E & Sandars, DL (2006) Determining the environmental burdens and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities. Main Report. Defra Research Project IS0205; available at http://www.agrilca.org
6. ADAS (2007) The Environmental Impact of Livestock Production. Report for Defra FFG.
7. de Vries, M & de Boer, IJM (2010) Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments. Livest Sci 28, 111.
8. Leinonen, I, Williams, AG, Wiseman, J et al. (2014) The potential to mitigate the environmental impacts of broiler production systems through changes in their diets. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition – 2013, pp. 123144 [Garnsworthy, PC and Wiseman, J, editors]. Packington, Leics.: Context Products Ltd.
9. BSI (2006) Environmental management: Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. Available at http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=37456
10. Williams, AG, Audsley, E & Sandars, DL (2007) Environmental burdens of livestock production systems derived from life cycle assessment (LCA). In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, pp. 171200 [Garnsworthy, PC and Wiseman, J, editors]. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.
11. Williams, AG, Audsley, E & Sandars, DL (2010) Environmental burdens of producing bread wheat, oilseed rape and potatoes in England and Wales using simulation and system modeling. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15, 855868.
12. Leinonen, I, Williams, AG, Wiseman, J et al. (2012) Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the UK through a Life Cycle Assessment: broiler production systems. Poult Sci 91, 825.
13. Leinonen, I, Williams, AG, Wiseman, J et al. (2012) Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the UK through a Life Cycle Assessment: egg production systems. Poult Sci 91, 2640.
14. Leinonen, I, Williams, AG, Waller, AH et al. (2013) The potential to reduce environmental impacts of poultry production systems by including alternative protein crops in the diet: a quantitative comparison with uncertainty analysis. Agric Syst 121, 3342.
15. Leinonen, I, Williams, AG & Kyriazakis, I (2014) The effects of welfare-enhancing system changes on the environmental impacts of broiler and egg production. Poult Sci 93, 256266.
16. Katajajuuri, JM, Grönroos, J, Usva, K et al. (2006) Broilerin fileesuikaleiden tuotannon ympäristövaikutukset ja kehittämismahdollisuudet. Maa- ja elintarviketalous 90, 1118.
17. BSI (2011) Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. PAS 2050:2011. Available at http://www.bsigroup.com/Standards-and-Publications/How-we-can-help-you/Professional-Standards-Service/PAS-2050/
18. Leinonen, I, Williams, AG & Kyriazakis, I (2015) Evaluating methods to account for the greenhouse gas emissions from Land Use Changes in agricultural LCA. In Proc of the 9th Int Conf on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2014), pp. 711717 [Schenck, R and Huizenga, D, editors]. Vashon, WA, USA: ACLCA.
19. Haas, G, Wetterich, F & Köpke, U (2001) Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agric Ecosyst Environ 83, 4353.
20. Basset-Mens, C, Ledgard, S & Boyes, B (2009) Eco-efficiency of intensification scenarios for milk production in New Zealand. Ecol Econ 68, 16151625.
21. Boggia, A, Paolotti, L & Castellini, C (2010) Environmental impact evaluation of conventional, organic and organic-plus poultry production systems using life cycle assessment. World's Poult Sci J 66, 95114.
22. Dekker, SEM, de Boer, IJM, Vermeij, I et al. (2011) Ecological and economic evaluation of Dutch egg production systems. Livest Sci 139, 109121.
23. Arroyo, J, Fortun-Lamothe, L, Auvergne, A et al. (2013) Environmental influence of maize substitution by sorghum and diet presentation on goose foie gras production. J Clean Prod 59, 5162.
24. Leinonen, I, Williams, AG & Kyriazakis, I (2016) Comparing the environmental impacts of UK turkey production systems using analytical error propagation in uncertainty analysis. J Clean Prod 112, 141148.
25. Oxenboll, KM, Pontoppidan, K & Fru-Nji, F (2011) Use of a protease in poultry feed offers promising environmental benefits. Int J Poult Sci 10, 842848.
26. Leinonen, I & Williams, AG (2015) Effects of dietary protease on nitrogen emissions from broiler production: a holistic comparison using Life Cycle Assessment. J Sci Food Agric 95, 30413046.
27. Neeteson-van Nieuwenhoven, AM, Knap, P & Avendaño, S (2013) The role of sustainable commercial pig and poultry breeding for food security. Anim Front 3/2013, 5257.
28. Laughlin, K (2007) The Evolution of Genetics, Breeding and Production. Temperton Fellowship Report No. 15. Newport, Shropshire: Harper Adams University College.
29. de Beer, M, Elfick, D & Emmerson, DA (2011) Is a feed conversion ratio 1:1 realistic and appropriate goal for broiler chicken in the next 10 years? Recent Adv Anim Nutr – Aust 18, 914.
30. Mussini, FJ (2012) Comparative response of different broiler genotypes to dietary nutrient levels. PhD Thesis, University of Arkansas.
31. Defra (2008) A study of the scope for the application of research in animal genomics and breeding to reduce nitrogen and methane emissions from livestock based food chains. Defra Project AC0204. Available at http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&ProjectID=14662
32. Pelletier, N (2010) Breeding poultry for environmental performance: A life cycle-based supply chain perspective. Proc. Ninth World Congress Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Paper 75. Leipzig, Germany.
33. Aviagen (2014) Ross 308 Broiler: Performance Objectives. Available at http://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross-308-Broiler-PO-2014-EN.pdf
34. Audsley, E, Brander, M, Chatterton, J et al. (2009) How Low can we go? An Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the UK Food System and the Scope to Reduce them by 2050. WWF-UK.
35. Baumgartner, DU, de Baan, L & Nemecek, T (2008) European Grain Legumes - Environment-Friendly Animal Feed? Life Cycle Assessement of Pork, Chicken Meat, Egg, and Milk Production. Grain Legumes Integrated Project. Final Report WP2·2, Environmental Analysis of the Feed Chain. Zürich: Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART.
36. Scacchi, CCO, González-García, S, Caserini, S et al. (2010) Greenhouse gases emissions and energy use of wheat grain-based bioethanol fuel blends. Sci Total Environ 408, 50105018.
37. Huang, Y, Anderson, M, McIlveen-Wright, D et al. (2015) Biochar and renewable energy generation from poultry litter waste: a technical and economic analysis based on computational simulations. Appl Energy 160, 656663.
38. Williams, AG, Leinonen, I & Kyriazakis, I (2016) Environmental benefits of using turkey litter as a fuel instead of a fertiliser. J Clean Prod 113, 167175.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed