Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:08:25.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of probiotic and vitamin D supplementation on markers of vitamin D status and bone turnover in healthy adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2009

T. R. Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College, Cork
L. Brennan
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin 4
A. O'Connor
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin 4
L. Scully
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College, Cork
S. Healy
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College, Cork
A. O'Sullivan
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin 4
B. Mion
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin 4
G. Dawson
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College, Cork
S. Kaluskar
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin 4
M. J. Gibney
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin 4
F. Shanahan
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University College, Cork Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, University College, Cork
K. D. Cashman
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College, Cork Department of Medicine, University College, Cork
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2009

There is some in vitro evidence that probiotic bacteria may influence Ca uptake in the intestine(Reference Gilman and Cashman1), possibly through an interaction with vitamin D endocrine system(Reference Giuliano and Wood2), with potential benefit for bone turnover. However, the effect of probiotic bacteria on bone turnover has not been investigated in human subjects. The objective of the present study was to examine the effect of 4-week supplementation with probiotics and vitamin D on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (S-25(OH)D), parathyroid hormone (PTH) and biochemical markers of bone turnover in healthy adults.

In a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial conducted in Dublin and Cork, 147 subjects aged between 18–63 years (seventy men and seventy-seven women) were randomised to receive daily for 4 weeks at two different intervention periods (November 2007 and April 2008): 15 μg cholecalciferol and 1×109Lactobacillus Salivarius, UCC 118 (probiotic); 15 μg cholecalciferol and probiotic placebo; cholecalciferol placebo and probiotic; cholecalciferol placebo and probiotic placebo. S-25(OH)D concentrations and serum concentrations of PTH, osteocalcin (OC), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) as well as urinary concentrations of N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx) were assessed at baseline and post intervention using commercially-available ELISA kits. One-way between-groups analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to examine the effect of treatment group on post-intervention biochemical variables while including age, gender, season of blood draw and baseline biochemical concentrations as covariates.

BCE, bone collagen equivalents.

a,b Values in rows with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (Tukey post-hoc test; P<0.05).

* Effect of treatment on post-intervention variables was assessed by ANCOVA including age, gender, season and baseline concentrations as covariates.

No significant baseline differences in biochemical variables across the treatment groups were observed. Vitamin D supplementation significantly increased S-25(OH)D concentrations. Vitamin D and/or probiotic supplementation had no effect on serum PTH or bone turnover markers concentrations. In conclusion, probiotics and/or vitamin D supplementation over 4 weeks appear to have no effect on the rate of bone turnover in apparently-healthy adults.

We wish to acknowledge the Irish Department of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries through the Food Institutional Research Measure for their support.

References

1. Gilman, J & Cashman, KD (2006) Curr Issues Intest Microbiol 7, 15.Google Scholar
2. Giuliano, AR & Wood, RJ (1991) Am J Physiol 260, G207G212.Google Scholar
Figure 0

a,b