Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:13:37.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietary factors that influence maternal iodine status in UK pregnant women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2013

S. C. Bath
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH
C. D. Steer
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TH, UK
P. M. Emmett
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TH, UK
J. Golding
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TH, UK
M. P. Rayman
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

An adequate intake of iodine is vital during pregnancy as iodine is required for fetal brain development( 1 ). We have previously shown that a low iodine status in UK pregnant women is adversely associated with child cognition (IQ and reading ability) up to the age of nine years( Reference Bath, Steer and Golding 2 ). As the UK is now classified as mildly iodine deficient and has no national policy for ensuring adequate iodine status, such as salt iodisation, it is important to understand the dietary factors that contribute to iodine status in pregnancy.

Our study investigated maternal iodine status in women of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) cohort who were recruited in the 1990s( Reference Golding, Pembrey and Jones 3 ). We measured iodine concentration (and creatinine to adjust for urine volume) in urine samples collected from 1475 women throughout pregnancy [median gestational age 11 (IQR 9–13) weeks]. Women completed a Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) during pregnancy( Reference Rogers and Emmett 4 ) and, for the purposes of comparing to urinary iodine excretion, six iodine-rich food items were selected [i.e. milk, cheese, eggs (and quiche), seafood (white, oily and shellfish) meat/poultry, and grains (rice, pasta and bread)]. The FFQ answers were converted to weekly number of portions for single items (eggs and cheese) or weekly intake (grams)( Reference Rogers and Emmett 4 ) for composite food groups (seafood, milk, meat/poultry and grains) and then recoded to tertiles.

The group was classified as iodine-deficient( 1 ), with a median urinary iodine concentration of 92.6 μg/L (iodine/creatinine ratio 114 μg/g). The iodine/creatinine ratio significantly differed between tertiles of weekly milk (p<0.001) and seafood (p=0.03) consumption and between the number portions of egg consumed per week (p=0.01). After adjustment for all six food categories, maternal age and gestational week of urine sample, a low iodine status (<150 μg/g) was significantly associated with low milk and egg consumption (Table); maternal age was independently positively associated with the iodine/creatinine ratio (p=0.001).

* adjusted for dietary factors, maternal age and gestational week of urine sample.

Milk and eggs are important dietary sources of iodine in pregnancy and although seafood was related to iodine status in the unadjusted analysis, the association disappeared after adjustment for other factors. This may be indicative of low seafood consumption in the UK and may possibly reflect the fact that the iodine concentration in a urine sample is related to recent dietary intake (previous 24–48 hours), whereas the FFQ gives a more general overview of dietary intake, so some food items may fail to show associations. Our results should be interpreted with a degree of caution because of the inherent limitations of dietary assessment from food-frequency questionnaires.

This work was partly supported by the European Community's 7th Framework Programme (FP7/2008–2013) grant agreement no. 212652 (NUTRIMENTHE “The Effect of Diet on the Mental Performance of Children”).

References

1. WHO, UNICEF & ICCIDD (2007) Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
2. Bath, SC, Steer, C, Golding, J et al. (2013) Lancet, In press.Google Scholar
3. Golding, J, Pembrey, M & Jones, R (2001) Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 15, 7487.Google Scholar
4. Rogers, I & Emmett, P (1998) Eur J Clin Nutr 52, 246250.Google Scholar
Figure 0

*