Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:33:58.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acute energy intake and appetite responses following high-intensity interval exercise in 12–13 year old boys and girls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2013

J. Varley
Affiliation:
Children's Health and Exercise Research Centre, St Luke's Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX1 2L, UK
M. Moore
Affiliation:
School of Health Professionals, Plymouth University, Plymouth, PL6 8BH, UK
C. A. Williams
Affiliation:
Children's Health and Exercise Research Centre, St Luke's Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX1 2L, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

Following exercise, gender differences in energy intake (EI) and appetite have been reported in adult literature. High intensity exercise suppresses appetite in males but not females( Reference Thompson, Wolfe and Eikelboom 1 , Reference Pomerleau, Imbeault, Parker and Doucet2 ) and significantly increases EI in females but not males( Reference Thompson, Wolfe and Eikelboom 1 , Reference Pomerleau, Imbeault, Parker and Doucet2 ). Investigating gender differences in EI and appetite following exercise in the paediatric population has not been performed in normal weight children, and only once in obese adolescents( Reference Thievel, Isacco and Taillardat 3 ). Therefore, it is important to distinguish gender effects at a young age as maintaining energy balance post exercise is important for growth.

Twenty boys and 18 girls (12–13 y) participated in this study. In the control condition no exercise was permitted from arrival for breakfast until after lunch had been consumed. The exercise condition involved sprint cycling for 10 s followed by 110 s slow active recovery, repeated 15 times for a total duration of 30 min. Sixty minutes post completion of the exercise an ad libitum lunch was offered and EI was recorded. Lunch consisted of sandwiches and cake offered in excess and with homogenised macronutrient compositions( Reference Poppitt, McCormack and Buffenstein 4 ). Differences in EI at lunch relative to exercise energy expenditure were calculated. Appetite ratings of hunger, fullness and prospective consumption were rated 6 times throughout the day through visual analogue scales( Reference Flint, Raben, Blundell and Astrup 5 ).

There were no significant differences in EI between conditions for either gender (p>0.05). The mean EI difference between conditions was not representative of individual data; Figure 1a and 1b. EI compensation was not significantly correlated with any anthropometric measures for boys (R 2=0.31, p=0.64) or girls (R 2=0.16, p=0.95).

Figure 1a and 1b. Individual differences for energy intake in MJ on the exercise condition when compared to sedentary condition in boys and girls.

Prospective consumption was found to have a significant interaction over time when contrasted between conditions for the boys. The boys expressed a reduction in their desire to eat following exercise, similar to that found in adult males( Reference Pomerleau, Imbeault, Parker and Doucet 2 ). Hunger and fullness showed no significant interactions for either gender. High intensity interval exercise reduced the desire to eat in boys but not girls. This reduction did not track into changes of EI for the subsequent meal. This is the first study to report gender differences in appetite following exercise in children and requires further elucidation.

We would like to acknowledge PhD studentship finding from Kellogg Ltd UK.

References

1. Thompson, D, Wolfe, L & Eikelboom, R (1998) Med Sci Sports Exerc 20, 222–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Pomerleau, M, Imbeault, P, Parker, T & Doucet, E (2004) Am J Clin Nutr 80, 12301236.Google Scholar
3. Thievel, D, Isacco, L, Taillardat, M et al. (2011) Appetite 56, 658661.Google Scholar
4. Poppitt, S, McCormack, D & Buffenstein, R (1998) Physiol Behav 64, 279–85.Google Scholar
5. Flint, A, Raben, A, Blundell, J & Astrup, A (2000) Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 3848.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1a and 1b. Individual differences for energy intake in MJ on the exercise condition when compared to sedentary condition in boys and girls.