Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Teaching and Learning Design Methods: Facing the Related Issues with TRIZ

  • Lorenzo Fiorineschi (a1), Francesco Saverio Frillici (a1) and Federico Rotini (a1)

Abstract

Design methods are claimed to support designers but, although they are largely taught in academia, their industrial uptake is still lacking. Many reasons have been identified about this flaw and some potential suggestions have been proposed and discussed in literature to overcome the problem. However, a further evidence is that although many students learn such methods from years, they partially or totally abandon the learned methods in their professional careers. This could partially explain the gap between academic and industrial diffusion of design methods. Literature provides suggestions for improving the learning experience of students but different didactical contexts may need more tailored solutions. The work shown in this paper exploits the problem solving potentialities of the TRIZ toolset to provide hints for improving a course focused on teaching a systematic conceptual design method. A set of suggestions has been obtained together some guidelines for applying the considered TRIZ tools to other didactical contexts.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Teaching and Learning Design Methods: Facing the Related Issues with TRIZ
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Teaching and Learning Design Methods: Facing the Related Issues with TRIZ
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Teaching and Learning Design Methods: Facing the Related Issues with TRIZ
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.

Corresponding author

Contact: Rotini, Federico, University of Florence, Industrial Engineering, Italy, federico.rotini@unifi.it

References

Hide All
“40 Inventive Principles”. (2018), The TRIZ Journal, available at: https://triz-journal.com/40-inventive-principles-examples/ (accessed 10 October 2018).
Altshuller, G.S. (1984), Creativity as an Exact Science., Gordon and Breach Science, Amsterdam.
Atman, C.J. and Bursic, K.M. (1996), “Teaching engineering design: Can reading a textbook make a difference?”, Research in Engineering Design - Theory, Applications, and Concurrent Engineering, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 240250.
Badke-Schaub, P. and Voute, E. (2018), “Design Methodology : Where Do You Go?”, International Design Conference - Design 2018, pp. 2532.
Barak, M. (2013), “Teaching engineering and technology: cognitive, knowledge and problem-solving taxonomies”, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 316333.
Becattini, N., Cascini, G. and Rotini, F. (2011), “Correlations between the evolution of contradictions and the law of identity increase”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 9, pp. 236250.
Bell, S. (2010), “Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future”, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, Vol. 83 No. 2, pp. 3943.
Björklund, T.A. (2013), “Initial mental representations of design problems: Differences between experts and novices”, Design Studies, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 135160.
Van Boeijen, A., Daalhuizen, J., Van der Schoor, R. and Zijlstra, J. (2014), Delft Design Guide: Design Strategies and Methods, BIS Publishers, Amsterdam.
Cardella, M. (2007), “Engineering Design Processes : A Comparison of Engineering Design Processes : A Comparison of Students”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 96 No. 4, pp. 359379.
Cascini, G., Graziosi, S., Montagna, F. and Rotini, F. (2017), “On the Factors Affecting Design Education Within a Multi-Disciplinary Class”, Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 2144.
Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D.D. and Leifer, L.J. (2005), “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94 No. 1, pp. 103120.
Eder, W.E. (1998), “Design Modeling-A Design Science Approach (and Why Does Industry Not Use It?)”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 355371.
Fiorineschi, L. (2018), “Abstraction framework to support students in learning creative conceptual design”, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 616636.
Fiorineschi, L., Frillici, F.S. and Rotini, F. (2018), “Enhancing functional decomposition and morphology with TRIZ: Literature review”, Computers in Industry, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 94 No. January, pp. 115.
Fiorineschi, L., Rotini, F. and Rissone, P. (2016), “A new conceptual design approach for overcoming the flaws of functional decomposition and morphology”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 27 No. 7, pp. 438468.
Frillici, F.S.F.S., Fiorineschi, L. and Cascini, G. (2015), “Linking TRIZ to conceptual design engineering approaches”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 131, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.421.
Frost, R.B. (1999), “Why Does Industry Ignore Design Science?”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 301304.
Gadd, K. (2011), TRIZ for Engineers: Enabling Inventive Problem Solving, John Wiley and sons, Inc, available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470684320.
Geis, C., Bierhals, R., Schuster, I., Badke-Schaub, P. and Birkhofer, H. (2008), “Methods in Practice – a Study on Requirements for Development and Transfer of Design Methods”, DESIGN 2008 - 10th International Design Conference, pp. 369376.
Gudur, R. (2016), “Challenges in teaching design thinking skills to novice design students”, International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Aalborg, Denmark.
Guertler, M.R. (2018), “How to Design Methods for Application - Empirical Insights from Industry”, International Design Conference - Design 2018, pp. 11611172.
Henderson, D., Jaboklow, K., Daly, S., McKilligan, S. and Silk, E. (2018), “Comparing the Effects of Design Interventions on the Quality of Design Concepts as a Reflection of Ideation Flexibility”, Proceedings of the ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC2018, Quebec City.
Jagtap, S., Warell, A., Hiort, V., Motte, D. and Larsson, A. (2014), “Design Methods and Factors Influencing their Uptake in Product Development Companies: a Review”, International Design Conference - DESIGN 2014, pp. 231240.
Khomenko, N., De Guio, R., Lelait, L. and Kaikov, I. (2007), “A Framework for OTSM-TRIZ Based Computer Support to be used in Complex Problem Management”, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, Vol. 30 No. 1/2, pp. 88104.
Kirton, M.J. (1994), Adaptors and Innovators. Styles of Creativity and Problem Solving, Routledge, London.
Mantelet, F., Segonds, F. and Jean, C. (2018), “Additive creativity: An innovative way to enhance manufacturing engineering education”, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 34 No. 6, pp. 17761784.
Northwood, M.D., Northwood, D.O. and Northwood, M.G. (2003), “Problem-Based Learning (Pbl): From the Health Sciences to Engineering to Value-Added in the Workplace”., Global J. of Engng. Educ., Vol. 7 No. 2.
Ozkan, O. and Dogan, F. (2013), “Cognitive strategies of analogical reasoning in design: Differences between expert and novice designers”, Design Studies, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 161192.
Pugh, S. (1991), Total Design. Integrated Methods for Succesfull Product Engineering, Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts.
Reiß, N.;, Albers, A.; and Bursac, N. (2017), “Approaches To Increasing Method Acceptance in Agile Product Development Processes”, Internation Conference on Engineering Design, ICED17, Vol. 4, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 435444.
Salamatov, Y. (1999), TRIZ: The Right Solution at the Right Time: A Guide to Innovative Problem Solving, Insytec B.V.
Song, T. and Becker, K. (2014), “Expert Vs Novice Learner.Pdf”, International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), pp. 181190.
Souchkov, V. (2007), “Breakthrough Thinking with TRIZ for Business and Management”, ICG T&C, available at: www.xtriz.com/TRIZforBusinessAndManagement.pdf.
Tomiyama, T., Gu, P., Jin, Y., Lutters, D., Kind, C. and Kimura, F. (2009), “Design methodologies: Industrial and educational applications”, CIRP Annals, Vol. 58 No. 2, pp. 543565.
Wendrich, R. (2017), “Blow bits: Creative playgrounds, gamification and virtuosity with hybrid design tools and environments (hdte)”, 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17), Vol. 8 No. DS87-8, pp. 8998.
Wynn, D.C. and Clarkson, P.J. (2017), “Process models in design and development”, Research in Engineering Design, Springer London, No. July, pp. 142.
Yilmaz, S. and Daly, S.R. (2016), “Feedback in concept development: Comparing design disciplines”, Design Studies, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 45, pp. 137158.

Keywords

Teaching and Learning Design Methods: Facing the Related Issues with TRIZ

  • Lorenzo Fiorineschi (a1), Francesco Saverio Frillici (a1) and Federico Rotini (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed