Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A Systematic Approach to Model Objectives in Predevelopment Projects

  • Thilo Oliver Richter (a1), Albert Albers (a1), Johannes Willi Gesk (a1) and Jan-Hendrik Witt (a1)

Abstract

This contribution presents a systematic for the elicitation of objectives and the utilization of objectives to identify reference products. The systematic is based on existing meta models. The model of objectives as proposed in this research eases decision-making and outlines the next validation activities. A key success factor is the project transferability between teams, which is often necessary in predevelopment. This is ensured through comprehensibility of objectives which benefits from the linkage between the model of objectives and the knowledge base. The proposed systematic is applied to a predevelopment project which is used as case study. In the case study it has been shown that objectives can be used to identify reference products. The approach is validated in a live-lab setting with seven engineering teams with six graduate students, two engineers of an industrial partner and a research associate. Several workshops were used to train all members of the teams in the systematic. The effects of the systematic are assessed in dedicated interviews, a survey as well as with observation of the engineering teams during milestones and engineering activities between milestones.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A Systematic Approach to Model Objectives in Predevelopment Projects
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A Systematic Approach to Model Objectives in Predevelopment Projects
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A Systematic Approach to Model Objectives in Predevelopment Projects
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.

Corresponding author

Contact: Richter, Thilo Oliver, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), IPEK - Institute of Product Engineering, Germany, thilo.richter@kit.edu

References

Hide All
Albers, A. (2010), “Five hypotheses about engineering processes and their consequences”, In: Horváth, I. (Ed.), Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering - Tmce 2010, April 12-16, Ancona, Italy, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering Univ. of Technology, Delft.
Albers, A., Bursac, N., Heimicke, J., Walter, B. and Reiß, N. (Eds.) (2017a), 20 Years of Co-Creation Using Case Based Learning an Integrated Approach for Teaching Innovation and Research in Product Generation Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 2011.
Albers, A. and Lohmeyer, Q. (2012), “Advanced systems engineering. Towards a model-based and human-centered methodology”, In: Horváth, I. (Ed.), Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering, Tmce 2012, May 7-11, 2012, Karlsruhe, Germany; Digital Proceedings, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering Delft University of Technology, Delft.
Albers, A., Lohmeyer, Q., Quentin, Ebel, B. and Bjoern, (Eds.) (2011), Dimensions of Objectives in Interdisciplinary Product Development Projects.
Albers, A., Rapp, S., Birk, C. and Bursac, N. (Eds.) (2017b), Die Frühe Phase der PGE – Produktgenerationsentwicklung.
Albers, A., Rapp, S., Heitger, N., Wattenberg, F. and Bursac, N. (2018), “Reference products in pge – product generation engineering: analyzing challenges based on the system hierarchy”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 70, pp. 469474. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.02.046.
Allmann, C. (2007), “Automobile vorentwicklung, anforderungsmanagement auf der grünen wiese”, GI Softwaretechnik-Trends, Vol. 27 No. 1.
Booton, R.C. and Ramo, S. (1984), “The development of systems engineering”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. AES-20 No. 4, pp. 306310. http://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.1984.4502055.
Buede, D.M. and Miller, W.D. (2016), The Engineering Design of Systems: Models and Methods, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, Hoboken, New Jersey.
Cooper, R.G. (1988), “Predevelopment activities determine new product success”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 237247. http://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(88)90007-7.
Darlington, M.J. and Culley, S.J. (2002), “Current research in the engineering design requirement”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 216 No. 3, pp. 375388. http://doi.org/10.1243/0954405021520049.
Ebel, B. (2015), “Modellierung von Zielsystemen in der interdisziplinären produktentstehung”, Dissertation, Institut für Produktentwicklung (IPEK), Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Karlsruhe, 2015.
Ebert, C. (2012), Systematisches Requirements Engineering: Anforderungen ermitteln, spezifizieren, analysieren und verwalten, Vol. 4., überarb. Aufl., dpunkt-Verl., Heidelberg.
Eisner, H. (1997), “Essentials of project and systems engineering management”, Choice Reviews Online, Vol. 34 No. 08, pp. 34-4492–34-4492. http://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.34-4492.
Erman, L.D., Hayes-Roth, F., Lesser, V.R. and Reddy, D.R. (1980), “The hearsay-ii speech-understanding system: integrating knowledge to resolve uncertainty”, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 213253. http://doi.org/10.1145/356810.356816.
Holder, K., Zech, A., Ramsaier, M., Stetter, R., Niedermeier, H.-P., Rudolph, S. and Till, M. (2017), “Model-based requirements management in gear systems design based on graph-based design languages”, Applied Sciences, Vol. 7 No. 11, p. 1112. http://doi.org/10.3390/app7111112.
Matthiesen, S., Meboldt, M. and Lohmeyer, Q. (2012), “The dilemma of managing iterations in time-to-market development processes”, In: Heidig, P. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Modelling and Management Engineering Processes, Univ , Cambrigde, UK, pp. 127140.
Mohagheghi, P. and Aagedal, J. (2007), “Evaluating quality in model-driven engineering”, In International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering (MISE 2007): Proceedings, ICSE 2007 workshops [20-26 May 2007, Minneapolis ICSE 2007, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 5/20/2007 - 5/26/2007, IEEE, Piscataway, N.J., p. 6. http://doi.org/10.1109/MISE.2007.6.
Nuseibeh, B. and Easterbrook, S. (2000), “Requirements Engineering”, In: Finkelstein, A. (Ed.), The future of software engineering, Limerick, Ireland, 6/4/2000 - 6/11/2000, ACM, New York, pp. 3546. http://doi.org/10.1145/336512.336523.
Schulze, S.-O. (2016), “Systems Engineering”, In: Lindemann, U. (Ed.), Handbuch Produktentwicklung, Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, München, pp. 153184.
Stechert, C. (2010), “Modellierung komplexer anforderungen. Bericht Nr. 75”, Dissertation, Institut für Konstruktionstechnik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, 2010.
Summers, J.D. and Shah, J.J. (2010), “Mechanical engineering design complexity metrics: Size, coupling, and solvability”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 132 No. 2, p. 21004. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000759.
van Lamsweerde, A. (2004), “Goal-oriented requirements enginering: A roundtrip from research to practice”, In 12th IEEE international requirements engineering conference, Kyoto, Japan, Sept. 6-10, 2004, IEEE, pp. 36. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICRE.2004.1335648.
Walden, D.D., Roedler, G.J., Forsberg, K., Hamelin, R.D., Shortell, T.M. and Kaffenberger, R. (Eds.) (2017), INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbuch: Ein Leitfaden für Systemlebenszyklus-Prozesse und -Aktivitäten INCOSE-TP-2003-002-04 2015, Deutsche Übersetzung der vierten Ausgabe, GfSE e.V, München.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed