Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Prototyping Canvas: Design Tool for Planning Purposeful Prototypes

  • Carlye Lauff (a1), Jessica Menold (a2) and Kristin L. Wood (a1)

Abstract

While prototypes are critical to the creation of successful products and innovative solutions, building a prototype is characterized by large sunk costs and a plethora of unknowns. The versatility and effectiveness of prototypes paired with the ambiguous nature of developing a prototype can lead to wasted resources. Recent studies support this claim, demonstrating that under certain circumstances, designers often prototype without a clear purpose, building prototypes as a function of the design process rather than as a function of the design. These findings motivated the creation of the Prototyping Canvas, a tool to aid designers in planning for purposeful prototypes by identifying critical assumptions and questions to guide development. Business and engineering design literature influenced the development of the canvas, which was first tested with a client project in the SUTD-MIT International Design Centre (IDC). The feedback and insights from the design team guided revisions to the canvas. The updated canvas was then validated with 55 professionals during a design project sprint. The purpose of this paper is to present the Prototyping Canvas as a valid and effective design tool.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Prototyping Canvas: Design Tool for Planning Purposeful Prototypes
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Prototyping Canvas: Design Tool for Planning Purposeful Prototypes
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Prototyping Canvas: Design Tool for Planning Purposeful Prototypes
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.

Corresponding author

Contact: Lauff, Carlye Anne, SUTD-MIT, International Design Centre, Singapore, carlye_lauff@sutd.edu.sg

References

Hide All
Amarsy, N. (2015), Why and How Organizations Around the World Apply the Business Model Canvas. [online] Strategzer. Available at: blog.strategyzer.com/posts/2015/2/9/why-and-how-organizations-around-the-world-apply-the-business-model-canvas (Accessed 26 Nov. 2018).
Andreasen, M.M. and Hein, L. (1987), Integrated Product Development, Springer-Verlag / IFS Ltd, UK.
Blank, S. (2016), The Mission Model Canvas - An Adapted Business Model Canvas for Mission-Driven Organizations. [online] Steve Blank. Available at: steveblank.com/2016/02/23/the-mission-model-canvas-an-adapted-business-model-canvas-for-mission-driven-organizations/ (Accessed 26 Nov. 2018).
Buchenau, M. and Suri, J.F. (2000), “Experience Prototyping”. Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, ACM, pp. 424433.
Brandt, E. (2007), “How tangible mock-ups support design collaboration”, Knowledge, Technology & Policy, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 179192.
Camburn, B., Dunlap, B., Gurjar, T., Hamon, C., Green, M., Jensen, D., Crawford, R., Otto, K. and Wood, K. (2015), “A Systematic Method for Design Prototyping”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 137 No. 8, p. 081102.
Camburn, B., Viswanathan, V., Linsey, J., Anderson, D., Jensen, D., Crawford, R., Otto, K. and Wood, K. (2017a), “Design Prototyping Methods: State of the Art in Strategies, Techniques, and Guidelines”, Design Science, Vol. 3 No. 13. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.10
Camburn, B.A., Auernhammer, J.M., Sng, K.H.E., Mignone, P.J., Arlitt, R.M., Perez, K.B., Huang, Z., Basnet, S., Blessing, L.T. and Wood, K.L. (2017b), “Design Innovation: A Study of Integrated Practice”, ASME 2017 IDETC/CIE, p. V007T06A031.
Camburn, B. and Wood, K. (2018), “Principles of maker and DIY fabrication: Enabling design prototypes at low cost”, Design Studies, Vol. 58, pp. 6388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.04.002
Christie, E.J., Jensen, D.D., Buckley, R.T., Menefee, D.A., Ziegler, K.K., Wood, K.L. and Crawford, R. (2012), “Prototyping strategies: literature review and identification of critical variables”, American Society for Engineering Education Conference.
Daly, S.R., Yilmaz, S., Christian, J.L., Seifert, C.M. and Gonzalez, R. (2012), “Design heuristics in engineering concept generation”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 101 No. 4, pp. 601629.
Deininger, M., Daly, S.R., Sienko, K.H. and Lee, J.C. (2017), “Novice designers' use of prototypes in engineering design”, Design Studies, Vol. 51, pp. 2565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.04.002
Dow, S.P., Glassco, A., Kass, J., Schwarz, M. and Klemmer, S.R. (2009), The effect of parallel prototyping on design performance, learning, and self-efficacy, Stanford Tech Report.
Dunlap, B.U., Hamon, C.L., Camburn, B.A., Crawford, R.H., Jensen, D.D., Green, M.G., Otto, K. and Wood, K.L. (2014), “Heuristics-based prototyping strategy formation: development and testing of a new prototyping planning tool”, ASME 2014 IDETC/CIE, p. V011T14A019.
Gerber, E. and Carroll, M. (2012), “The psychological experience of prototyping”, Design Studies, Vol. 33, pp. 6484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.005
Gerber, E. (2015), Mockups Bracket Tournament: A Prototype is Born. [online] Northwestern University Segal Design Institute. Available at: design.northwestern.edu/news-events/articles/2015/mockups-launch.html (Accessed 26 Nov. 2018).
Greenberg, M.D., Pardo, B., Hariharan, K. and Gerber, E. (2013), “Crowdfunding support tools: predicting success & failure”, CHI'13 Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, pp. 18151820
Hamon, C.L. (2017), “Virtual versus physical prototypes: development and testing of a prototyping planning tool”, Master's Thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
Henderson, K. (1991), “Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 448473.
Houde, S. and Hill, C. (1997), “What do prototypes prototype?”, In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Second Edition, Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 367381
IDEO, Design Kit (2015), The field guide to human-centered design. [online] IDEO Design Kit. Available at: http://www.designkit.org/ (Accessed 26 Nov. 2018).
Jensen, M.B., Elverum, C.W. and Steinert, M. (2017), “Eliciting unknown unknowns with prototypes: Introducing prototrials and prototrial-driven cultures”, Design Studies, Vol. 49, pp. 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.12.002
Kriesi, C., Blindheim, J., Bjelland, Ø. and Steinert, M. (2016), “Creating dynamic requirements through iteratively prototyping critical functionalities”, 26th CIRP Design Conference.
Lande, M. and Leifer, L. (2009), “Prototyping to learn: Characterizing engineering students’ prototyping activities and prototypes”, 17th International Conference on Engineering Design.
Lauff, C.A., (2018), “Prototyping in the Wild: The Role of Prototypes in Companies”, Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder.
Lauff, C.A., Kotys-Schwartz, D. and Rentschler, M.E. (2018a), “What is a Prototype? What are the Roles of Prototypes in Companies?”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 140 No. 6, p. 061102.
Lauff, C., Weidler-Lewis, J., Kotys-Schwartz, D., Rentschler, M.E. (2018b), “Prototypes as Intermediary Objects for Design Coordination in First-Year Design Courses,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 10851103.
Lauff, C., Kotys-Schwartz, D. and Rentschler, M.E. (2017), “Perceptions of prototypes: pilot study comparing students and professionals”, ASME 2017 IDETC/CIE, p. V003T04A011.
Leifer, L.J. and Steinert, M. (2011), “Dancing with ambiguity: Causality behavior, design thinking, and triple-loop-learning”, Information Knowledge Systems Management, Vol. 10, pp. 151173.
Lemons, G., Carberry, A., Swan, C., Jarvin, L. and Rogers, C. (2010), “The benefits of model building in teaching engineering design”, Design Studies, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 288309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.02.001
Lin, J. and Seepersad, C.C. (2007), “Empathic lead users: the effects of extraordinary user experiences on customer needs analysis and product redesign”, ASME 2007 IDETC/CIE, pp. 289296.
Maurya, A. (2012), Running lean: iterate from plan A to a plan that works. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
Menold, J.D. (2017), “Prototype For X (PFX): A Prototyping Framework to Support Product Design”, Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
Menold, J., Jablokow, K. and Simpson, T.W. (2017), “Prototype for X (PFX): A holistic framework for structuring prototyping methods to support engineering design”, Design Studies, Vol. 50, pp. 70112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.03.001
Menold, J., Simpson, T.W. and Jablokow, K. (2018), “The prototype for X framework: exploring the effects of a structured prototyping framework on functional prototypes”, Research in Engineering Design, pp. 115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-018-0289-4
Moe, R.E., Jensen, D.D. and Wood, K.L. (2004), “Prototype partitioning based on requirement flexibility”, ASME 2004 IDETC/CIE, pp. 6577.
Neeley, W.L., Lim, K., Zhu, A. and Yang, M.C. (2013), “Building fast to think faster: exploiting rapid prototyping to accelerate ideation during early stage design”, ASME 2013 IDETC/CIE, p. V005T06A022.
Osterwalder, A. (2004), “The business model ontology: A proposition in a design science approach”, Doctoral dissertation, University of Lausanne.
Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2010), Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.
Otto, K. and Wood, K. (2001). Product design: techniques in reverse engineering and new product design. Prentice-Hall.
Rhinow, H., Köppen, E. and Meinel, C. (2012), “Prototypes as boundary objects in innovation processes”, International Conference on Design Research Society , Bangkok, Thailand.
Roschuni, C., Kramer, J., Zhang, Q., Zakskorn, L. and Agogino, A. (2015), “Design talking: an ontology of design methods to support a common language of design”, International Conference on Engineering Design.
Schrage, M. (2000), “Serious play: The future of prototyping and prototyping the future”, Design Management Journal, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 5057.
Star, S. L. (2010), “This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 601617.
Thomke, S.H. (1998), “Managing experimentation in the design of new products”, Management Science, Vol. 44 No. 6, pp. 743762.
Tiong, E., Seow, O., Teo, K., Silva, A., Wood, K.L., Jensen, D.D. and Yang, M.C. (2018), “The Economies and Dimensionality of Prototyping: Value, Time, Cost and Fidelity”, ASME 2018 IDETC/CIE, p. V007T06A045.
Ulrich, K. T. and Eppinger, D. S. (2000), Product design and development. McGraw-Hill.
Viswanathan, V. and Linsey, J. (2011), “Design fixation in physical modeling: an investigation on the role of sunk cost”, ASME 2011 IDETC/CIE, pp. 119130.
Yang, M. (2005), “A study of prototypes, design activity, and design outcome”, Design Studies, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 649669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.04.005
Yilmaz, S., Daly, S.R., Seifert, C.M. and Gonzalez, R. (2016), “Evidence-based design heuristics for idea generation”, Design Studies, Vol. 46, pp. 95124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.05.001

Keywords

Prototyping Canvas: Design Tool for Planning Purposeful Prototypes

  • Carlye Lauff (a1), Jessica Menold (a2) and Kristin L. Wood (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed