Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Formulating Design Recommendations for the Acceptance of the Use and Results of Point-of-Care Testing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Literature Review

  • Yvonne Jolanda Melanie Licher (a1), Jan Simon Visser (a1), G-Young Van (a1) and Jan Carel Diehl (a1)

Abstract

In low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), diagnostics are not always available in remote areas. Hospitals and healthcare centres are often too far from the community, and waiting times are up to a few hours even for relatively simple procedures. Moreover, travelling to the healthcare centre and taking the diagnostic test is frequently unaffordable. Point of Care Tests (POCTs) can improve the availability, accessibility and affordability of the diagnostics by providing the test at the time and place of patient care. Although many POCTs have been developed already, there remain challenges to enable the healthcare workers (HCW) and the patients to use the device in practice. In this paper, we aim to provide a systemic overview of the barriers and opportunities for the adoption of use and acceptance of the results of POCTs based on the literature. The barriers and opportunities were clustered into six themes and used to draw out recommendations for the future design.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Formulating Design Recommendations for the Acceptance of the Use and Results of Point-of-Care Testing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Literature Review
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Formulating Design Recommendations for the Acceptance of the Use and Results of Point-of-Care Testing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Literature Review
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Formulating Design Recommendations for the Acceptance of the Use and Results of Point-of-Care Testing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Literature Review
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.

Corresponding author

Contact: Licher, Yvonne Jolanda Melanie, TU Delft, Industrial Design, The Netherlands, y.j.m.licher@student.tudelft.nl

References

Hide All
Burgess, L. and Sargent, J. (2007), “Enhancing user acceptance of mandated mobile health information systems: The ePO (electronic Point-Of-Care Project) experience”, Paper presented at the Medinfo 2007: Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Health (Medical) Informatics; Building Sustainable Health Systems.
Chin, C. D., Linder, V. and Sia, S. K. (2012), “Commercialization of microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices”, Lab on a Chip, Vol. 12 No. 12, pp. 21182134. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2lc21204h
Gadd, C. S., Baskaran, P. and Lobach, D. F. (1998), “Identification of design features to enhance utilization and acceptance of systems for Internet-based decision support at the point of care”, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium.
Hutchinson, A. B., Corbie-Smith, G., Thomas, S. B., Mohanan, S. and Del Rio, C. (2004), “Understanding the patient's perspective on rapid and routine HIV testing in an inner-city urgent care center”, AIDS Education and prevention, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 101114. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.16.2.101.29394
Iwamoto, R., Santos, A. L. R., Chavannes, N., Reis, R. and Diehl, J. C. (2017), “Considerations for an Access-Centered Design of the Fever Thermometer in Low-Resource Settings: A Literature Review”, JMIR human factors, Vol. 4 No. 1. https://doi.org/10.2196/humanfactors.6778
Mourad, N. (2012), “Perceived factors influencing acceptance and adoption of mobile technology by clinicians in practice”, A master thesis submitted to the Faculty of Health Policy and Management at the University of Minnesota.
Nichols, J. H. (2007), “Point of care testing”, Clinics in laboratory medicine, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 893908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2007.07.003
Pai, N. P., Vadnais, C., Denkinger, C., Engel, N. and Pai, M. (2012), “Point-of-care testing for infectious diseases: diversity, complexity, and barriers in low-and middle-income countries”, PLoS medicine, Vol. 9 No. 9, p. e1001306. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001306
Peeling, R. and Mabey, D. (2010), “Point-of-care tests for diagnosing infections in the developing world”, Clinical microbiology and infection, Vol. 16 No. 8, pp. 10621069. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03279.x
Peters, D. H., Garg, A., Bloom, G., Walker, D. G., Brieger, W. R. and Rahman, M. H. (2008), “Poverty and access to health care in developing countries”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1136 No. 1, pp. 161171. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1425.011
Price, C. P. (2001), “Regular review: Point of care testing”, BMJ: British Medical Journal, Vol. 322 No. 7297, P. 1285. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7297.1285
Ruizendaal, E., Dierickx, S., Grietens, K. P., Schallig, H. D., Pagnoni, F. and Mens, P. F. (2014), “Success or failure of critical steps in community case management of malaria with rapid diagnostic tests: a systematic review”, Malaria journal, Vol. 13 No. 1, p. 229. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-229
Steinhubl, S. R., Muse, E. D. and Topol, E. J. (2015), “The emerging field of mobile health”, Science translational medicine, Vol. 7 No. 283, pp. 283rv283283rv283. https://doi.org/10.3402/ehtj.v2i0.7082
Wallis, L., Blessing, P., Dalwai, M. and Shin, S. D. (2017), “Integrating mHealth at point of care in low-and middle-income settings: the system perspective”, Global health action, Vol. 10 No. sup3, p. 1327686.
Yager, P., Domingo, G. J. and Gerdes, J. (2008), “Point-of-care diagnostics for global health”, Annual review of biomedical engineering, Vol. 10. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1327686
WHO (2017, July 28), “Integrated community case management of malaria”. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/malaria/areas/community_case_management/overview/en/

Keywords

Formulating Design Recommendations for the Acceptance of the Use and Results of Point-of-Care Testing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Literature Review

  • Yvonne Jolanda Melanie Licher (a1), Jan Simon Visser (a1), G-Young Van (a1) and Jan Carel Diehl (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.