Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:14:25.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Designing Digital Technology for Service Work: Systematic and Participatory Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Digital technology is dramatically changing our life, industry, and society. Recent evolution of digital technology is expected to significantly impact service work, such as healthcare and social welfare. Meanwhile, an insufficient understanding of service work and workers' needs leads to the failure of technology development and integration. To make digital technology better fit to values and work practices of service workers, various studies have been conducted, especially in the field of participatory design, interaction design, and service design. However, the contribution of engineering design to this topic is still limited. This paper proposes an engineering design approach to design digital technology for better integration in service work. This study combines a modelling method to represent specifications of digital technology and the participatory approach in alignment with the changing service work and workers' values. A case study of the mobile application system for elderly-care professionals is introduced to exemplify the effectiveness of the proposed method. This study intends to foster innovation of service work through digitalization.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Akaka, M. A., Vargo, S. L. and Lusch, R. F. (2013), “The complexity of context: A service ecosystems approach for international marketing”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 120.Google Scholar
Bue Lintho, O. and Nes Begnum, M. E. (2018), “Towards inclusive service design in the digital society: current practices and future recommendations”, NordDesign 2018, Linköping, Sweden, 14th-17th August 2018.Google Scholar
Calvo, R. A. and Peters, D. (2015), Positive Computing: Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
D'Emidio, T., Dorton, D. and Duncan, E. (2015), “Service Innovation in a Digital World”, McKinsey Quarterly, Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/service-innovation-in-a-digital-world (3.12.2018).Google Scholar
Djellal, F. and Gallouj, F. (2006), “Innovation in care services for the elderly”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 303327. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060600570943Google Scholar
Edvardsson, B. and Olsson, J. (1996), “Key concepts for new service development”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 140164.Google Scholar
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (2013), Well-being at Work: Creating a Positive Work Environment -Literature Review, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Fitzsimmons, J. and Fitzsimmons, M.J. (1999), New service development: creating memorable experiences, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Borning, A. and Huldtgren, A. (2013), “Value sensitive design and information systems”, In: Doorn, N., Schuurbiers, D., van de Poel, I. and Gorman, M. (Eds.), Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 16, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 5595. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_4Google Scholar
Fukuda, K., Nakajima, M., Nishimura, S. and Nishimura, T. (2017), “Non-Routine Knowledge Sharing in Elderly Care-Facility for Better Services”, The 18th European Conference on Knowledge Management, Barcelona, Spain, 7-8 September 2017, pp. 326333.Google Scholar
Future of Life Institute (2017), Asilomar AI Principles, Available at: https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/ (13.12.2018)Google Scholar
Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (1991), Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
Goedkoop, M.J., van Halen, J.G., te Riele, H. and Rommens, P.J.M. (1999), Product Service Systems: Ecological and Economic Basics, Dutch Ministries of Environment (VROM) and Economic Affairs (EZ), Hague, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Hara, T., Arai, T. and Shimomura, Y. (2009), “A CAD system for service innovation: Integrated representation of function, service activity, and product behaviour”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 367388.Google Scholar
International Labour Organizations (ILO) (2018), Workplace Well-being, Available at: https://www.ilo.org/safework/areasofwork/workplace-health-promotion-and-well-being/WCMS_118396/lang--en/index.htm (4 December 2018)Google Scholar
Leikas, J. (2014), Ikäteknologia, NewPrint Oy, Raisio.Google Scholar
Miwa, H., Watanabe, K., Fukuhara, T., Nakajima, M. and Nishimura, T. (2015), “Measurement and description of nursing-care service process”, Transactions of the JSME, Vol. 81 No. 822, (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.1299/transjsme.14-00207Google Scholar
Pérez García, M. and Saffón López, S. (2018), “Meet AURA: A Study on how Iterative Design Methodologies and User Participation Help Improve Results in Technology Driven Pilot Projects”, DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 21-24 May 2018, pp. 12891300. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0423Google Scholar
Pot, F. D. (2017), “Workplace Innovation and Wellbeing at Work”, In: Oeij, P. R. A., Rus, D. and Pot, F. D. (Eds.), Workplace Innovation Theory, Research and Practice, Springer, Cham, pp. 95110.Google Scholar
Salvendy, G. (2012), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Shimomura, Y. and Tomiyama, T. (2005), “Service modeling for service engineering”, In: Arai, E., Kimura, F. and Shirase, K. (Eds.), Knowledge and Skill Chains in Engineering and Manufacturing, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 3138.Google Scholar
Siegel, C., Hochgatterer, A. and Dorner, T.E. (2014), “Contributions of ambient assisted living for health and quality of life in the elderly and care services - a qualitative analysis from the experts’ perspective of care service professionals”, BMC Geriatrics, Vol. 14 No. 122, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-112.Google Scholar
Stahl, B.C. and Wright, D. (2018), “Ethics and privacy in AI and Big Data”, IEEE Security & Privacy, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 2633. http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MSP.2018.2701164.Google Scholar
Stickdorn, M. and Schneider, J. (2012), This Is Service Design Thinking: Basics, Tools, Cases, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
Tomiyama, T., Umeda, Y. and Yoshikawa, H. (1993), “A CAD for functional design”, CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 143146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62412-3.Google Scholar
Watanabe, K., Fukuhara, T., Miwa, H. and Nishimura, T. (2013), “A unified approach for systematic and participatory design”, 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13), Seoul, Korea, 19-22 August 2013.Google Scholar
Watanabe, K., Fukuda, K. and Nishimura, T. (2015), “A technology-assisted design methodology for employee-driven innovation in services”, Technology Innovation Management Review, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 614.Google Scholar
Watanabe, K., Hyytinen, K. and Tuovila, T. (2018), “Challenges in Integrating Assistive Technologies into Elderly-Care Services: Comparative Study between Japan and Finland”, European Review of Service Economics and Management, No. 6, pp. 97122.Google Scholar