Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:50:11.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current Challenges of Agile Hardware Development: What are Still the Pain Points Nowadays?

Part of: Innovation Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Alexander Atzberger  and
Kristin Paetzold

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Originally developed for the software industry, agile development is being applied in the hardware field nowadays as well due to its benefits when having to deal with volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) conditions. However, certain complications arise when applying the concept of agility in the hardware. In this publication, based on the challenges identified by Ovesen in 2012, the current challenges of agile development for hardware are gathered using an embedded design approach, ensuring its actuality based on the latest surveys and empirical data. The current state regarding the challenges is displayed and its interrelations as well as their advancements compared to seven years ago is discussed. Moreover, an attempt to explain the difficulties of applying agile development is given by a hardware-related complexity model.

Keywords

Agile hardware developmentResearch methodologies and methodsDesign methodologyNew product development
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 2209 - 2218
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019

References

Bahlow, J., Janning, J., Jebenstreit, H. and Kullmann, G. (2013), “Der Einführungsprozess”, in Kullmann, G., Longmuß, J., Bullinger, A. and Spanner-Ulmer, B. (Eds.), Agiles Projektmanagement in Der Praxis, aw&I Wissenschaft und Praxis, Chemnitz, pp. 36–45.Google Scholar
Böhmer, A., Beckmann, A. and Lindemann, U. (2015), “Open innovation ecosystem - makerspaces within an agile innovation process”, in Huizingh, E., Conn, S., Bitran, I. (Ed.), Proceedings of the ISPIM Innovation Summit: Changing the Innovation Landscape, The International Society for Innovation Management, Brisbane, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Böhmer, A.I., Hugger, P. and Lindemann, U. (2017), “Scrum within hardware development insights of the application of scrum for the development of a passive exoskeleton”, 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation: Engineering, Technology and Innovation Management Beyond 2020: New Challenges, New Approaches, ICE/ITMC 2017 - Proceedings, pp. 790–798.Google Scholar
Brenner, R. and Wunder, S. (2015), “Scaled agile framework: Presentation and real world example”, 2015 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW), IEEE, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
Conforto, E., Salum, F., Amaral, D., da Silva, S.L. and de Almeida, L.F.M. (2014), “Can agile project managemet be adopted by industries other than software development?”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 21–34.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.G. (2011), Winning at New Products: Creating Value Through Innovation, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M. and Lassenius, C. (2016), “Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review”, Journal of Systems and Software, Elsevier Inc., Vol. 119, pp. 87–108.Google Scholar
Eklund, U. and Berger, C. (2017), “Scaling agile development in mechatronic organizations - A comparative case study”, Proceedings - 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice Track, ICSE-SEIP 2017, pp. 173–182.Google Scholar
Gregory, P., Barroca, L., Taylor, K., Salah, D. and Sharp, H. (2015), “Agile challenges in practice: A thematic analysis”, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 212, pp. 64–80.Google Scholar
Hoda, R., Salleh, N. and Grundy, J. (2018), “The rise and evolution of agile software development”, IEEE Software, IEEE, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 58–63.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. (2015), Xanpan: Team Centric Agile Software Development, Software Strategy Ltd.Google Scholar
Komus, A., Kuberg, M., Erretkamps, H., Koch, C.-P., Böven, E., Fries, J. and Hermen, P., et al. (2018), Studie Status Quo PEP - 2018, Koblenz.Google Scholar
Larman, C. and Vodde, B. (2016), Lage-Scale Scrum: More with LeSS, Addison-Wesley Professional.Google Scholar
Link, P. (2014), “Agile Methoden im Produkt-Lifecycle-Prozess – Mit agilen Methoden die Komplexität im Innovationsprozess handhaben”, Komplexitätsmanagement in Unternehmen, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, pp. 65–92.Google Scholar
Ovesen, N. (2012), The Challenges of Becoming Agile, PhD Thesis, Aalborg University.Google Scholar
Ovesen, N. and Dowlen, C. (2012), “The challenges of becoming agile - experiences from new product development in industry and design education”, 14th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education: Design Education for Future Wellbeing, Antwerp, pp. 9–14.Google Scholar
Paasivaara, M., Durasiewicz, S. and Lassenius, C. (2009), “Using scrum in distributed agile development: a multiple case study”, Proceedings - 2009 4th IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, ICGSE 2009, pp. 195–204.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T.S., Atzberger, A., Gerling, C., Schrof, J., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2019), Agile Development of Physical Products: An Empirical Study about Potentials, Transition and Applicability, University of the Ger man Federal Armed Forces, Munich.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T.S., Böhmer, A.I., Wallisch, A., Paetzold, K. and Lindemann, U. (2017), “Media richness theory in agile development: Choosing appropriate kinds of prototypes to obtain reliable feedback”, 23th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE'17), Madeira, Portugal.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T.S., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2018a), Agile Development of Physical Products: An Empirical Study about Motivations, Potentials and Applicability, University of the German Federal Armed Forces, Munich.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T.S., Weiss, S. and Paetzold, K. (2018b), “Expected vs. real effects of agile development of physical products: Apportioning the hype”, International DESIGN Conference 2018, Dubrovnik, pp. 2121–2132.Google Scholar
Schröder, A. and Schrofner, A. (2015), “Hochleistung ist crossfunktional”, Der F&E Manager - Für Mehr Effizienz in Der Innovation, pp. 6–13.Google Scholar
Schwaber, K. and Sutherland, J. (2017), “Scrum guide 2017”, No. November, pp. 6–17.Google Scholar
VDI. (2004), “VDI 2206 - Entwicklungsmethodik für Mechatronische Systeme”, VDI Handbuch, Berlin.Google Scholar
VersionOne. (2018), 12th Annual State of Agile Report.Google Scholar
We.Conect. (2018), Agile PEP Minds Survey 2018, Berlin.Google Scholar