Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:34:00.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vertical distribution of HMXBs in NGC 55: Constraining their centre of mass velocity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2019

Babis Politakis
Affiliation:
University of Crete, Department of Physics, Heraklion 71003, Greece
Andreas Zezas
Affiliation:
University of Crete, Department of Physics, Heraklion 71003, Greece Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion 71003, Greece Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138
Jeff J. Andrews
Affiliation:
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion 71003, Greece
Stephen J. Williams
Affiliation:
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion 71003, Greece USNO - 3450 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20392-5420
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We analyse the vertical distribution of High Mass X-ray Binaries (HMXBs) in NGC 55, the nearest edge-on galaxy to the Milky Way. Our analysis reveals significant spatial offsets of HMXBs from the star forming regions, greater than those observed in the SMC and the LMC but similar with the Milky Way. The spatial offsets can be explained by a momentum kick the X-ray binaries receive during the formation of the compact object. The difference between the scale height of the vertical distribution of HMXBs and the vertical distribution of star-forming activity is 0.48±0.04 kpc. The centre-of-mass velocity of the distribution of HMXBs in NGC 55 is moving at a velocity of 52.4±11.4 km s−1, greater than the corresponding velocity of HMXBs in the SMC and LMC, but consistent with velocities of Milky Way HMXBs.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2019 

References

Antoniou, V. & Zezas, A. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 528 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, B., Williams, B. F., Eracleous, M., et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 94 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaauw, A. 1961,BAIN, 15, 265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, M. J. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 1379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbiano, G. 2006, ARAA, 44, 323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryer, C. & Kalogera, V. 1997, ApJ, 489, 244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, H.-J., Gilfanov, M. & Sunyaev, R. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 793 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, D.-L. & Zhu, Z. 2008, Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics, 32, 360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudritzki, R. P., Castro, N., Urbaneja, M. A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 829, 70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okazaki, A. T., Hayasaki, K. & Moritani, Y. 2013, PASJ, 65, 41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otte, B. & Dettmar, R.-J. 1999, A&A, v.343, pp. 705712 Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, E. P. J., Portegies Zwart, S. F., Bhattacharya, D. & Kaper, L. 2000, AAP, 364, 563 Google Scholar
Zezas, A., Fabbiano, G., Rots, A. H. & Murray, S. S. 2002, ApJ, 577, 710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar