Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:48:27.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

V1187 Herculis: A Red Novae progenitor, and the most extreme mass ratio binary known

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2019

Ronald G. Samec
Affiliation:
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute email: ronald.samec@gmail.com
Heather Chamberlain
Affiliation:
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute email: ronald.samec@gmail.com
Daniel Caton
Affiliation:
Dark Sky Observatory, Appalachian State University
Russell Robb
Affiliation:
University of Victoria
Danny R. Faulkner
Affiliation:
Johnson Observatory
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Complete BVRCIC light curves of V1187 Her were obtained in May 2017 at the Dark Sky Observatory in North Carolina with the 0.81-m reflector of Appalachian State University. Earlier, spectra were taken at the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory with the 1.8-m telescope. The spectral type was found to be F8±1 V (6250 K), so the binary is of solar-type. V1187 Her was previously identified as a low amplitude (V < 0.2 mag), short period, overcontact eclipsing binary (EW) with a period of 0.310726 d. Strikingly, despite its low amplitude, the early light curves show total eclipses (eclipse duration ≍31.5 minutes), which is a characteristic of an extreme mass ratio binary. A period study covering 11 years reveals a continuous period decrease dP/dt=–4.7×10–9 d yr–1. The multi-band Wilson-Devinney light curve solution gives a fill-out of 79% and a mass ratio of only 0.0440±0.0001. There is a cool spot region on the secondary component, which is 400 K hotter than the primary. The inclination is only 66.85±0.05 despite the system’s total eclipses.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
© International Astronomical Union 2019 

References

Akerlof, C., Amrose, S., Balsano, R., et al. 2000, AJ, 119, 1901 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaettler, E., & Diethelm, R. 2007, IBVS, 5799Google Scholar
Bradsteet, D. H., & Steelman, D. P. 2002, BAAS, 34, 1224 Google Scholar
Diethelm, R. 2007, IBVS, 5781Google Scholar
Diethelm, R. 2010a, IBVS, 5920Google Scholar
Diethelm, R. 2010b, IBVS, 5922Google Scholar
Kazarovets, E. V., Samus, N. N., Durlevich, O. V., et al. 2013, IBVS, 6052Google Scholar
Kaluzny, J., Rozyczka, M., Pych, W., et al. 2013, Acta Astronomica, 63, 309 Google Scholar
Li, H.-L., Wei, J.-Y., Yang, Y.-G., & Dai, H.-F. 2016, RAA, 16, 2 Google Scholar
Nelson, R. H. 2010, IBVS, 5929Google Scholar
Qian, S.-B., Zhu, L.-Y., Soonthornthum, B., et al. 2005, AJ, 130, 1206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sriram, K., Malu, S., Choi, C. S., & Vivekananda Rao, P. 2016, AJ, 151, 69 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. E. 1990, ApJ, 356, 613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. E., & Devinney, E. J. 1971, ApJ, 166, 605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zola, S., Rucinski, S. M., Baran, A., et al. 2004, Acta Astronomica, 54, 299 Google Scholar