Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T12:44:51.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Star formation at low rates - the impact of lacking massive stars on stellar feedback

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2017

Gerhard Hensler
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Dept. of Astrophysics, Tuerkenschanzstr. 17, 1180 Vienna, Austria email: gerhard.hensler@univie.ac.at
Patrick Steyrleithner
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Dept. of Astrophysics, Tuerkenschanzstr. 17, 1180 Vienna, Austria email: gerhard.hensler@univie.ac.at
Simone Recchi
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Dept. of Astrophysics, Tuerkenschanzstr. 17, 1180 Vienna, Austria email: gerhard.hensler@univie.ac.at
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Due to their low masses dwarf galaxies experience low star-formation rates resulting in stellar cluster masses insufficient to fill the initial mass function (IMF) to the uppermost mass. Numerical simulations usually do not account for the completeness of the IMF, but treat a filed IMF by numbers, masses, and stellar feedback by fractions. To ensure that only entire stars are formed, we consider an IMF filled from the lower-mass regime and truncated where at least one entire massive star is formed.

By 3D simulations we investigate the effects of two possible IMFs on the evolution of dwarf galaxies: filled vs. truncated IMF. For the truncated IMF the star-formation self-regulation is suppressed, while the energy release by typeII supernovae is larger, both compared to the filled IMF. Moreover, the abundance ratios of particular elements yielded from massive and intermediate-mass stars differ significantly between the two IMF distributions.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2017 

References

Andrews, J. E., Calzetti, D., Chandar, R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 767, 51 Google Scholar
Andrews, J. E., Calzetti, D., Chandar, R., et al. 2014, ApJ, 793, 4 Google Scholar
Fryxell, B., Olson, K., Ricker, P., et al. 2000, ApJS, 131, 273 Google Scholar
Hensler, G. 2007, in eds. Ensellem, E. et al., EAS Publ. Ser. No., 7, p. 113 Google Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C. & Evans, N. J. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 531 Google Scholar
Köppen, J., Theis, C., & Hensler, G. 1995, A&A, 296, 99 Google Scholar
Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231 Google Scholar
Kroupa, P. 2014, Astrophys. and Space Sci. Proc., 36, 335 Google Scholar
Krumholz, M. R. 2014, Phys. Rep., 539, 49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, S. S. 2002, AJ, 124, 1393 Google Scholar
Lee, J. C., Elmegreen, B. G., Kennicutt, R. C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 774, 51 Google Scholar
Melekh, B., Recchi, S., Hensler, G., & Buhajenko, O. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 111 Google Scholar
Ploeckinger, S., Hensler, G., Recchi, S., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 3980 Google Scholar
Ploeckinger, S., Recchi, S., Hensler, G., & Kroupa, P. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 2512 Google Scholar
Salpeter, E. E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161 Google Scholar
Steyrleiztner, P., Hensler, G., Recchi, S., & Ploeckinger, S. 2016, MNRAS, submittedGoogle Scholar
Vorobyov, E. I., Recchi, S., & Hensler, G. 2012, A&A, 543, A129 Google Scholar