Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:18:46.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SpS5 - III. Matter ejection and feedback

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Yaël Nazé
Affiliation:
Department AGO, Allée du 6 Août 17, B5C, 4000-Liège, Belgium, email: naze@astro.ulg.ac.be
Xiao Che
Affiliation:
Dpt of Astronomy, Univ. of Michigan, 830 Dennison Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1042, USA
Nick L. J. Cox
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200D, Leuven, Belgium
José H. Groh
Affiliation:
Geneva Observ., Univ. of Geneva, Chemin des Maillettes 51, CH-1290 Sauverny, Switzerland
Martin Guerrero
Affiliation:
IAA-CSIC, Glorieta de la Astronomia s/n, 18008 Granada, Spain
Pierre Kervella
Affiliation:
LESIA, Obs. de Paris, CNRS UMR 8109, UPMC, 5 place J. Janssen, 92195, Meudon, France
Chien-De Lee
Affiliation:
Graduate institute of astronomy, National central university, Taiwan
Mikako Matsuura
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, UCL, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
M. Sally Oey
Affiliation:
Dpt of Astronomy, Univ. of Michigan, 830 Dennison Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1042, USA
Guy S. Stringfellow
Affiliation:
Center for Astroph. and Space Astr., Univ. of Colorado, 389 UCB, Boulder, CO, USA
Stephanie Wachter
Affiliation:
IPAC, California Inst. of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The last part of SpS5 dealt with the circumstellar environment. Structures are indeed found around several types of massive stars, such as blue and red supergiants, as well as WRs and LBVs. As shown in the last years, the potential of IR for their study is twofold: first, IR can help discover many previously unknown nebulae, leading to the identification of new massive stars as their progenitors; second, IR can help characterize the nebular features. Current and new IR facilities thus pave the way to a better understanding of the feedback from massive stars.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Baron, F., et al. 2012, ApJ 752, 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondin, J. M. & Koerwer, J. F. 1998, New Astronomy 3, 571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Che, X., et al. 2012, ApJ 757, 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Y.-H. 1981, ApJ 249, 195Google Scholar
Clark, J. S., Larionov, V. M., & Arkharov, A. 2005, A&A 435, 239Google Scholar
Comeron, F. & Kaper, L. 1998, A&A 338, 273Google Scholar
Cox, N., Kerschbaum, F., van Marle, A.-J., et al. 2012, A&A 537, A35Google Scholar
Crowther, P. A., Lennon, D. J., & Walborn, N. R. 2006, A&A 446, 279Google Scholar
Dgani, R., van Buren, D., & Noriega-Crespo, A. 1996, ApJ 461, 927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graus, A. S., Lamb, J. B., & Oey, M. S. 2012, ApJ in press (arXiv:1208.5486)Google Scholar
Groenewegen, M., et al. 2011, A&A 526, A162Google Scholar
Gvaramadze, V. V., Kniazev, A. Y., & Fabrika, S. 2010, MNRAS 405, 1047Google Scholar
Gvaramadze, V. V., et al. 2012, MNRAS 421, 3325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haubois, X., et al. 2009, A&A 508, 923Google Scholar
Huthoff, F. & Kaper, L. 2002, A&A 383, 999Google Scholar
Kervella, P., Verhoelst, T., Ridgway, S. T., Perrin, G., Lacour, S., Cami, J., & Haubois, X. 2009, A&A 504, 115Google Scholar
Kervella, P., Perrin, G., Chiavassa, A., Ridgway, S. T., Cami, J., Haubois, X., & Verhoelst, T. 2011, A&A 531, A117Google Scholar
Lee, C. D. & Chen, W. P. 2009, ASPC 404, 302Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, B., et al. 2010, Nature 464, 870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuura, M., et al. 2011, Science 333, 1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizuno, D. R., et al. 2010, AJ 139, 1542Google Scholar
Monnier, J. D., et al. 2004, ApJ 605, 436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monnier, J. D. 2007, Science 317, 342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noriega-Crespo, A., van Buren, D., & Dgani, R. 1997, AJ 113, 780Google Scholar
Peri, C. S., Benaglia, P., Brookes, D. P., Stevens, I. R., & Isequilla, N. L. 2012, A&A 538, A108Google Scholar
Przybilla, N., Firnstein, M., Nieva, M. F., Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 2010, A&A 517, A38Google Scholar
Smartt, S. J., Lennon, D. J., Kudritzki, R. P., Rosales, F., Ryans, R. S. I., Wright, N., A&A 391, 979Google Scholar
Smith, N. 2007, AJ 133, 1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stencel, R. E., Pesce, J. E. & Hagen Bauer, W. 1988, AJ 95, 141Google Scholar
Stencel, R. E., Pesce, J. E. & Hagen Bauer, W. 1989, AJ 97, 1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stringfellow, G. S., Gvaramadze, V. V., Beletsky, Y., & Kniazev, A. Y. 2012a, ASP Con Series in press, arXiv:1112.2686Google Scholar
Stringfellow, G. S., Gvaramadze, V. V., Beletsky, Y., & Kniazev, A. Y. 2012b, IAU Symp. 282, 267Google Scholar
Van Buren, D. & McCray, R. 1988, ApJ 329, L93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachter, S., Mauerhan, J. C., Van Dyk, S. D., Hoard, D. W., Kafka, S., & Morris, P. W. 2010, AJ 139, 2330Google Scholar
Weaver, R. P. 1977, Ph.D. Thesis Colorado University, BoulderGoogle Scholar
Wilkin, F. P. 1996, ApJ Letters 459, 31Google Scholar
Zhao, M., et al. 2008, ApJ 684, L95CrossRefGoogle Scholar