Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:55:56.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Search for High Energy emission from GRBs with MAGIC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2017

Alessio Berti Open the ORCID record for Alessio Berti [Opens in a new window]  and
for the MAGIC GRB group
Alessio Berti
Affiliation:
INFN Trieste, University of Trieste via Valerio 2, I-34127, Trieste, Italy email: Alessio.Berti@ts.infn.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) are the most violent explosions in the Universe, releasing a huge amount of energy in few seconds. While our understanding of the prompt and the afterglow phases has increased with Swift and Fermi, we have very few information about their High Energy (HE, E ≲ 100) emission components. This requires a ground-based experiment able to perform fast follow-up with enough sensitivity above ~ 50 GeV. The MAGIC (Major Atmospheric Gamma-ray Imaging Cherenkov) telescopes have been designed to perform fast follow-up on GRBs thanks to fast slewing movement and low energy threshold (~ 50 GeV). Since the beginning of the operations, MAGIC followed-up 89 GRBs in good observational conditions. In this contribution the MAGIC GRBs follow-up campaign and the results which could be obtained by detecting HE and Very High Energy (VHE, E ≳ 100 GeV) γ-rays from GRBs will be reviewed.

Keywords

Gamma-Ray BurstsMAGIChigh-energy emission
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 12 , Symposium S324: New Frontiers in Black Hole Astrophysics , September 2016 , pp. 70 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2017 

References

Abdo, A. A., et al. 2009, ApJ (Letters) 706, L138 Google Scholar
Ackermann, M., et al. 2014, Science, 343, 6166, 42 Google Scholar
Aleksic, J., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 30, 490 Google Scholar
Aleksic, J., et al. 2016, Astroparticle Physics, 72, 61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aleksic, J., et al. 2016, Astroparticle Physics, 72, 76 Google Scholar
Beloborodov, Andrei M. 2005, ApJ, 618, L13 Google Scholar
Beniamini, , et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 1073 Google Scholar
Böttcher, M. & Dermer, C. D. 1998, ApJ, 499, L131 Google Scholar
Fan, Y. Z. & Wei, D. M. 2005, MNRAS, 364, L42 Google Scholar
Kumar, P. & Duran, R. Barniol 2010, MNRAS, 409, 226 Google Scholar
Kumar, P. & Zhang, B. 2015, Physics Reports 561, 1-109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meszaros, P. & Rees, M. J. 1994, MNRAS, 269, L41 Google Scholar
Paczynski, B. & Xu, G. 1994, ApJ, 427, 708 Google Scholar
Pe’er, A. & Waxman, E. 2004, ApJ, 603, L1 Google Scholar
Plaga, R. 1995, Nature, 374, 430 Google Scholar
Sari, R. & Esin, Ann A. 2001, ApJ, 548, 787 Google Scholar
Takahashi, , et al. 2008, ApJ (Letters) 687, L5 Google Scholar
Toma, K., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 1663 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, E. 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 386 Google Scholar
Zhang, B. & Meszaros, P. 2001, ApJ, 559, 110 Google Scholar