Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:45:36.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisiting the capture of Mercury into its 3:2 spin-orbit resonance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2015

Benoît Noyelles ,
Julien Frouard ,
Valeri V. Makarov  and
Michael Efroimsky
Benoît Noyelles
Affiliation:
naXys, University of Namur, Belgium, email: benoit.noyelles@gmail.com
Julien Frouard
Affiliation:
CIERA, Northwestern University, Evanston IL 60208USA, email: frouard@imcce.fr
Valeri V. Makarov
Affiliation:
United States Naval Observatory, Washington DC 20392USA email: valeri.makarov@usno.navy.mil, michael.efroimsky@usno.navy.mil
Michael Efroimsky
Affiliation:
United States Naval Observatory, Washington DC 20392USA email: valeri.makarov@usno.navy.mil, michael.efroimsky@usno.navy.mil
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We simulate the despinning of Mercury, with or without a fluid core, and with a frequency-dependent tidal model employed. The tidal model incorporates the viscoelastic (Maxwell) rebound at low frequencies and a predominantly inelastic (Andrade) creep at higher frequencies. It is combined with a statistically relevant set of histories of Mercury's eccentricity. The tidal model has a dramatic influence on the behaviour of spin histories near spin-orbit resonances. The probabilities of capture into high-order resonances are greatly enhanced. Exploring several scenarios, we conclude that the present 3:2 spin state was achieved by entrapment of an initially prograde cold Mercury when its age was less than 20 Myr, i.e., well before differentiation.

Keywords

celestial mechanicsplanets and satellites: individual (Mercury)
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 9 , Issue S310: Complex Planetary Systems , July 2014 , pp. 33 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2014 

References

Correia, A. C. M. & Laskar, J. 2004, Nature, 429, 848Google Scholar
Correia, A. C. M. & Laskar, J. 2009, Icarus, 201, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, A. C. M. & Laskar, J. 2012, ApJL, 751: L43Google Scholar
Efroimsky, M. 2012. ApJ, 746: 150 ERRATA: ApJ, 763: 150 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassett, C. I., Head, J. W., & Baker, D. M. H., et al. 2012, JGR, 117, E00L08Google Scholar
Goldreich, P. & Peale, S. J. 1966, AJ, 71, 425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldreich, P. & Peale, S. J. 1967, AJ, 72, 662Google Scholar
Makarov, V. V., & Efroimsky, M. 2013. ApJ, Vol. 764, id. 27Google Scholar
Noyelles, B., Frouard, J., Makarov, V. V., & Efroimsky, M. 2014, Icarus, 241, 26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peale, S. J. & Boss, A. 1977, JGR, 82, 743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieczorek, M. A., Correia, A. C. M. & Le Feuvre, M., et al. 2012, Nature Geoscience, 5, 18Google Scholar