Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:51:34.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconstructing the star formation history of the Solar neighbourhood with Gaia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2018

Edouard J. Bernard Open the ORCID record for Edouard J. Bernard [Opens in a new window]
Edouard J. Bernard*
Affiliation:
Université Côte d’Azur, OCA, CNRS, Lagrange, France email: ebernard@oca.eu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Taking advantage of the Gaia DR1, we combined TGAS parallaxes with the Tycho-2 and APASS photometry to calculate the star formation history (SFH) of the solar neighbourhood within 250 pc using the colour-magnitude diagram fitting technique. Our dynamically-evolved SFH is in excellent agreement with that calculated from the Hipparcos catalogue within 80 pc of the Sun, showing an enhanced star formation rate (SFR) in the past ~4 Gyr. We then correct the SFR for the disc thickening with age to obtain a SFR that is representative of the whole solar cylinder, and show that even with an extreme correction our results are not consistent with an exponentially decreasing SFR as found by recent studies. Finally, we discuss how this technique can be applied out to ~5 kpc thanks to the next Gaia data releases, which will allow us to quantify the SFH of the thin disc, thick disc and halo in situ.

Keywords

Hertzsprung-Russell diagramGalaxy: diskGalaxy: evolutionGalaxy: formationsolar neighbourhood
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 13 , Symposium S334: Rediscovering our Galaxy , July 2017 , pp. 158 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Aumer, M., & Binney, J. J., 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1286Google Scholar
Bernard, E. J., Ferguson, A. M. N., Barker, M. K., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 2625Google Scholar
Bernard, E. J., Ferguson, A. M. N., Chapman, S. C., et al. 2015b, MNRAS, 453, L113Google Scholar
Bernard, E. J., Ferguson, A. M. N., Richardson, J. C., et al. 2015a, MNRAS, 446, 2789Google Scholar
Bernard, E. J. 2017, Proc. IAU Symp. 330, Astrometry and Astrophysics in the Gaia SkyGoogle Scholar
Bovy, J., 2017, MNRAS, 470, 1360Google Scholar
Casagrande, L., Schönrich, R., Asplund, M., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, A138Google Scholar
Chiappini, C., Matteucci, F., & Gratton, R., 1997, ApJ, 477, 765Google Scholar
Cignoni, M., Degl’Innocenti, S., Prada Moroni, P. G., & Shore, S. N., 2006, A&A, 459, 783Google Scholar
Gallart, C., Freedman, W. L., Aparicio, A., Bertelli, G., & Chiosi, C., 1999, AJ, 118, 2245Google Scholar
Haywood, M., Di Matteo, P., Lehnert, M. D., Katz, D., & Gómez, A., 2013, A&A, 560, A109Google Scholar
Henden, A. A., et al. 2012, JAAVSO, 40, 430Google Scholar
Jurić, M., et al., 2008, ApJ, 673, 864–914Google Scholar
Just, A., Gao, S., Vidrih, S., 2011, MNRAS, 411, 2586Google Scholar
Just, A., Jahreiß, H., 2010, MNRAS, 402, 461Google Scholar
Kroupa, P., 2002, Sci, 295, 82Google Scholar
Lindegren, L., Lammers, U., Bastian, U., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A4Google Scholar
Pecaut, M. J. & Mamajek, E. E., 2013, ApJS, 208, 9Google Scholar
Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., & Castelli, F., 2004, ApJ, 612, 168Google Scholar
Robin, A. C., Reylé, C., Derrière, S., & Picaud, S., 2003, A&A, 409, 523Google Scholar
Sellwood, J. A. & Binney, J. J., 2002, MNRAS, 336, 785Google Scholar
Snaith, O., et al. 2015, A&A, 578, A87Google Scholar
Vergely, J.-L., Köppen, J., Egret, D., & Bienaymé, O., 2002, A&A, 390, 917Google Scholar