Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T19:49:40.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Principal Component Analysis of Geomagnetic Activity: New Information on Solar Wind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2018

Kalevi Mursula
Affiliation:
ReSoLVE Centre of Excellence, Space Climate Research Unit, University of Oulu, Finland email: kalevi.mursula@oulu.fi
Lauri Holappa
Affiliation:
ReSoLVE Centre of Excellence, Space Climate Research Unit, University of Oulu, Finland email: kalevi.mursula@oulu.fi
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We use the principal component analysis to study geomagnetic activity at annual resolution using a network of 26 magnetic stations in 1966-2015, and an extended network of 40 stations in 1980-2015. The first principal component describes the long-term evolution of global geomagnetic activity, and has an excellent correlation with indices like the Kp/Ap index. The two networks give identical results for the first principal component. The second principal component is highly correlated with the annual percentage of high-speed streams (HSS). The extended network has a slightly higher sensitivity to HSSs. We verify the non-trivial latitudinal distribution of the second empirical orthogonal function. We find that the amplitude of the 22-year variation of geomagnetic activity has a closely similar latitudinal distribution as the second empirical orthogonal function. This verifies that the 22-year variation of geomagnetic activity is related to HSSs. The most likely cause is the Russell-McPherron mechanism.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2018 

References

Cliver, E. W., Boriakoff, V. & Boumar, K. H. 1996, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 27, 091Google Scholar
Holappa, L., Mursula, K., Asikainen, T. & Richardson, I. G., 2014, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 4544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mursula, K. & Martini, D., 2007, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L22, 107Google Scholar
Russell, C. T. & McPherron, R. L., 1973, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 92Google Scholar