Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T09:21:43.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prediction of solar magnetic cycles by a data assimilation method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

Irina N. Kitiashvili
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA email: irinasun@stanford.edu
Alexander G. Kosovichev
Affiliation:
W.W. Hansen Experimental Physics Lab., Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA email: sasha@sun.stanford.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We consider solar magnetic activity in the context of sunspot number variations, as a result of a non-linear oscillatory dynamo process. The apparent chaotic behavior of the 11-year sunspot cycles and undefined errors of observations create uncertainties for predicting the strength and duration of the cycles. Uncertainties in dynamo model parameters create additional difficulties for the forecasting. Modern data assimilation methods allow us to assimilate the observational data into the models for possible efficient and accurate estimations of the physical properties, which cannot be observed directly, such as the internal magnetic fields and helicity. We apply the Ensemble Kalman Filter method to a low-order non-linear dynamo model, which takes into account variations of the turbulent magnetic helicity and reproduces basic characteristics of the solar cycles. We investigate the predictive capabilities of this approach, and present test results for prediction of the previous cycles and a forecast of the next solar cycle 24.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2009

References

Bracewell, R. N. 1988, MNRAS 230, 535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evensen, G. 2007, Data assimilation, Springer, p. 279Google Scholar
Kitiashvili, I. N. & Kosovichev, A. G. 2008, ApJ 688, L49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitiashvili, I. N. & Kosovichev, A. G. 2009, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 103, in pressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleeorin, N. I. & Ruzmaikin, A. A. 1982, Magnetohydrodynamics 18, 116Google Scholar
Parker, E. N. 1955, ApJ 122, 293CrossRefGoogle Scholar