Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:39:59.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pinpointing the base of the AGN jets through general relativistic X-ray reverberation studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2015

D. Emmanoulopoulos*
Affiliation:
Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, Southampton, UK email: D.Emmanoulopoulos@soton.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many theoretical models of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) predict that the X-ray corona, lying above the black hole, constitutes the base of the X-ray jet. Thus, by studying the exact geometry of the close black hole environment, we can pinpoint the launching site of the jet. Detection of negative X-ray reverberation time delays (i.e. soft band X-ray variations lagging behind the corresponding hard band X-ray variations) can yield significant information about the geometrical properties of the AGN, such as the location of the X-ray source, as well as the physical properties of the the black hole, such as its mass and spin. In the frame-work of the lamp-post geometry, I present the first systematic X-ray time-lag modelling results of an ensemble of 12 AGN, using a fully general relativistic (GR) ray tracing approach for the estimation of the systems' response functions. By combing these state-of-the art GR response models with statistically innovative fitting routines, I derive the geometrical layout of the close BH environment for each source, unveiling the position of the AGN jet-base.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Chatterjee, R., Marscher, A. P., Jorstad, S. G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 734, 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovčiak, M., Karas, V., & Matt, G., 2004, MNRAS, 355, 1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, A.-M., Abrassart, A., & Collin, S., 2000, A&A, 357, 823Google Scholar
Emmanoulopoulos, D., McHardy, I. M., & Papadakis, I. E., 2011, MNRAS, 416, L94Google Scholar
Emmanoulopoulos, D., Papadakis, I. E., McHardy, I. M., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 1327Google Scholar
Emmanoulopoulos, D., Papadakis, et al. 2014, MNRAS 439 3931 (EMM14)Google Scholar
Gabriel, C., et al., 2004, in ASP Conference Series, ADASS XIII, 314, 759Google Scholar
George, I. M. & Fabian, A. C., 1991, MNRAS, 249, 352Google Scholar
Malkan, M. A., 1983, ApJ, 268, 582Google Scholar
Marscher, A. P. 2006, Astronomische Nachrichten, 327, 217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marscher, A. P., Jorstad, S. G., Gómez, J.-L., et al. 2002, Nature, 417, 625Google Scholar
Miller, L., Turner, T. J., Reeves, J. N., & Braito, V., 2010, MNRAS, 408, 1928Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., Vaughan, B. A., Wilms, J., Dove, J. B., & Begelman, M. C., 1999, ApJ, 510, 874Google Scholar
Shakura, N. I. & Sunyaev, R. A., 1973, A&A, 24, 337Google Scholar
Zoghbi, A., Uttley, P., & Fabian, A. C., 2011, MNRAS, 412, 59Google Scholar